Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Saw nearly 2000 signatures on the petition already, so clearly lots of people agree.


What the petition was arguing for is a real consultation, which doesn't gloss over things like how affordable the flats would be, how transport links will be affected, what green space will be created, impact on nearby residents etc. I inputted into the consultation in February but it was pretty daft (basically "do you want to see more housing, more jobs, more shops, or better transport?" - as if they are mutually exclusive).


If the community wants what is a really quite massive development then a real consultation will discover that. Something really great could be done with that site that will make Peckham a better place for 100+years, I don't think it's a case of being anti-development, it's anti-bad-development

I'm curious


People are saying "it's not what we want" but I've not seen anyone say what it is that would make this work


"Scale" what do you want?

"Affordable housing" great, but how much of a development needs to be affordable and what's the price point ?

"Height" great, but how high is too high ? If too low it will change the number of affordable houses on offer !

"Nature" again what do you want ?


Eileen, you are leading this charge and want a meaningful discussion but lay your cards on the table and say what it is you actually want to see there rather than "don't want this" there has to be a starting point for the discussion and engagement otherwise a compromise can't be made.


My twopennith worth, don't ask the impossible otherwise nothing will happen and the opportunity will be lost.

I think it is very clear what Eileen is asking for Artful. A meaningful consultation where local people can explore viable ideas that serve the local area best, as opposed to yet another get rich quick scheme for a corporate developer. There are more than enough examples of bad deals for Londoners that this and other councils have entered into.

Blah, that's the process but what are the actual parameters that are acceptable for development?


Like I said I'm not asking for people to say we don't want this and we want a consultation , I'm asking what would the development need to contain and look like as a starting point of a meaniful debate with the developer

Typical politician style answer

You can't say what you do want but it's not this


If there is no minimum acceptable level then how can you know when you have either got what you want or reached a fair compromise ?


The consultation process needs a starting point from both sides, yet all I'm hearing is "not this"


Oh well if you don't know you don't know but be brave enough to admit it, don't spin it

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah, that's the process but what are the actual

> parameters that are acceptable for development?

>

> Like I said I'm not asking for people to say we

> don't want this and we want a consultation , I'm

> asking what would the development need to contain

> and look like as a starting point of a meaniful

> debate with the developer


That will come out of the consultation!


* Please sign the petition for a meaningful consultation here: http://www.change.org/PECKHAMVOICES

Eileen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Blah, that's the process but what are the

> actual

> > parameters that are acceptable for development?

>

> >

> > Like I said I'm not asking for people to say we

> > don't want this and we want a consultation ,

> I'm

> > asking what would the development need to

> contain

> > and look like as a starting point of a meaniful

> > debate with the developer

>

> That will come out of the consultation!

>

> * Please sign the petition for a meaningful

> consultation here:

> http://www.change.org/PECKHAMVOICES


Oh come on Eileen, you must have a Peckham Vision.


Don't just repeat the same, I don't want this, I want a consultation.


What do YOU personally want to see?


What's your starting point in a consultation ?


How can you possibly know you've achieved you minimum requirements or a workable compromise ?


What's the vision of Peckham Vision ? There must be one otherwise the organisation name is a travesty !


I can't in all honesty add weight to your petition until I know what you want because it may not be anywhere near what I want (inward investment and the chance for Peckham to be an amazing town centre again)


So I ask again and I hope you don't do the usual vague politician answer because it won't cut the mustard.

Artful D said: What's the vision of Peckham Vision ? There must be one otherwise the organisation name is a travesty !

-------------------------------------

Peckham Vision website: https://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Vision:About says ?The vision is to develop an integrated approach to Peckham town centre as essential to a thriving and sustainable social and commercial centre, and to contribute to Peckham being a good place for all in which to live, work and visit.?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I asked what the vision for the development is, not for your mission statement.


This lack of clarity over what you want is frankly making me wonder if you are being deliberately stupid, and we all know you're not.


So again I ask what is Peckham vision's vision for the Aylesham centre development site ?


Of course if you haven't got one, then as I stated before , how will you know when you have reached a point where you are happy with the outcome?


And saying its for the consultation process just makes it obvious you haven't got an idea and won't be happy regardless of what's presented.


So please give a straight answer to the question as I'm sure other people are just as interested.

Artful D said: how will you know when you have reached a point where you are happy with the outcome?

----------------------------

Dear Artful D: This campaign is not about a specific 'outcome' in terms of the development. It is about achieving an informed consultation process which enables many people to give informed comments. We support a probing open questioning to seek good information and discussion to hear a variety of views before taking views about development plans. Of course if you do not support that approach then you will not support the petition. More than 2000 have now shown their support. For those who wish to do likewise here is the link: http://www.change.org/PECKHAMVOICES

So the answer I can ascertain from your clever wordsmith answers is, and correct me with an honest answer of what you want from the development if I'm wrong


"You don't want what's proposed, you want a consultation but you have no baseline for what you do want"


Hardly a visionary Eileen.


That approach is liable to result in the developers pulling out with the loss of investment in Peckham at a time when investment is like pixie dust and potentially, with the way retail is heading, leaving what should be an amazing town centre (retail footprint wise) struggling for decades to come.


The council will possibly never have funds again for investing in our town centres and I for one would be happier if Peckham Vision lived up to its name and had a real plan for how Peckham should be rather than an aspirational mission statement.


Yours

Mr. Artful Dogger

Blah, a consultation is a process to achieve a compromise but without knowing what is acceptable to Peckham vision /Eileen then how do you know when that compromise has been reached?


Eileen has a track record for objecting to oppertunities for the town centre but not giving solutions or working with developers.


The tram is a classic example, she objected to the terminus and depot being in Peckham on various grounds including that the depot would see shards of metal and sparks in the air of Peckham when they ground the wheels. During that consultation she didn't engage with TfL or cross river to find a compromise and as such Peckham lost the opportunity for an eco friendly transport, jobs, development and inward investment.


We all want the best for Peckham but without saying what that is (size, no of properties, unit cost...) then Peckham vision's objections seem to be objections for the sake of it.


All I'm asking for is Peckham Vision to actually say what the minimum acceptable option with this development is so that there is a starting point for the consultation.

A consultation is a meaningful exercise in consideration of a wide range of views and impact analysis. That has not been done as Peckham Vision have clearly outlined. Inviting those who agree with that to sign a petition does not require Eileen or any other individual to say what they would contribute to a meaningful consultation at this stage. That should be simple enough to understand.


Then you then go on to confirm that your real aim is to personally attack Eileen, over discussing the principle of the petition itself. Where it not for Eileen, Peckham High Street would have been turned into a huge bypass decades ago. Have a think about that. It is up to you to get involved in consultations if you want to counter other views. Attacking Peckham Vision and specifically Eileen for what they do is pointless.


The tram depot was always a bad idea. The size alone, with it's proximity to a dense residential area, among other things. If you look at the detail around at the time, there was a blatant lack of consultation and a stitched up planning process. The law provides for objection to that sort of practise, so you can't attack anyone for getting together to use that freedom. Besides, as a project, it was never a goer anyway. There was never any money for it.

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah, a consultation is a process to achieve a

> compromise but without knowing what is acceptable

> to Peckham vision /Eileen then how do you know

> when that compromise has been reached?

>

> Eileen has a track record for objecting to

> oppertunities for the town centre but not giving

> solutions or working with developers.

>

> The tram is a classic example, she objected to the

> terminus and depot being in Peckham on various

> grounds including that the depot would see shards

> of metal and sparks in the air of Peckham when

> they ground the wheels. During that consultation

> she didn't engage with TfL or cross river to find

> a compromise and as such Peckham lost the

> opportunity for an eco friendly transport, jobs,

> development and inward investment.

>

> We all want the best for Peckham but without

> saying what that is (size, no of properties, unit

> cost...) then Peckham vision's objections seem to

> be objections for the sake of it.

>

> All I'm asking for is Peckham Vision to actually

> say what the minimum acceptable option with this

> development is so that there is a starting point

> for the consultation.


Artful dodger, this is not about what Eileen (or Peckham Vision for that matter) wants, as Eileen has already pointed out. The whole point is that we don?t yet know what local people want because there has not been adequate consultation. There have been various local groups who have tried to work with the developers for the past 3 years; one I was involved with got over 5000 signatures in support of a charter with specific asks including meaningful and on-going consultation. Unfortunately the developer instead went away and created a scheme which does not meet the aspirations of the charter, particularly in regards to consultation, which is why we are now in this situation. The group of people who have formed Aylesham Community Action are from various backgrounds and groups and are calling for meaningful consultation and positive engagement so that the development Which will have a huge impact on our town centre and lives, works for all of us!

I can?t imagine why anyone would think that was a bad idea.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone ? keeping you up to date with progress on the petition: at last count it stands at 2,792, and continues to rise as the information about the plans and the August consultation spreads. So there is still an opportunity to sign and help support the request for a meaningful discussion with local people about the plans: http://www.change.org/PECKHAMVOICES

This is the local town centre for anyone who lives or works within a few miles of Peckham, whatever postcode we are in! So even if you are in SE22 or other nearby postcodes it is still your local town centre! Please do sign the petition if you would like to help achieve a meaningful consultation.

Some media reports:

* https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/dont-damage-peckhams-diverse-neighbourhood/

* https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/anger-at-1000-home-peckham-skyscraper-which-will-block-views-and-take-six-years-to-finish/

* https://www.residentadvisor.net/news/73554

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
    • The swifts & bats are alive & well around Upland Road. A beautiful sight & sound in the evenings. Just be sure to leave plenty of water out for them, as they are at high risk of dehydration & struggle to take flight at ground level.
    • Loads in upland road last night…
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...