Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's never occurred to me that the term "lady" could possibly be deemed offensive. Surely it's simply a manner of speech that fits into what is being said as demonstrated in the waiter example.


If a stranger of the female gender picked up a book in the library which my toddler dropped, I too would tell my child to thank the lady, it's simply descriptive and sounds nicer than 'woman'. I don't think I've heard any toddler use the word woman.

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I object to being referred to as a lady. The more

> I hear lady/ladies being used the more it grates

> on my sensibilities.

> I know it's scary and intimidating for some but

> seriously, get in the 21st century. I'm a WOMAN.


I take it from this then that you are not a lady.

I used to hate lady because of the connotations associated with it, but I now prefer to own it and stamp all over it!


What gets me het up though, is anyone declaring that such and such behaviour is not ladylike. So what! I don't want to be ladylike, so bugger off!

Nope, are you a lord?

I didn't actually say it was offensive merely that I objected.

I find it belittling and patronising personally.

MrBen - you could just say "follow me please".

It would appear I'm in the minority with my opinions but perhaps that's just because it is an insidious yet becoming more outdated way of referring to women and in 50 years it won't be used - unless you are actually a titled lady.

I for one do not defund it insulting to called a woman.

Now, all you little ladies, I've got stuff to do.

I would hope that in 50 years we won't have 'titled ladies' either. Now that really is an archaic idea ;)


Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nope, are you a lord?

> I didn't actually say it was offensive merely that

> I objected.

> I find it belittling and patronising personally.

> MrBen - you could just say "follow me please".

> It would appear I'm in the minority with my

> opinions but perhaps that's just because it is an

> insidious yet becoming more outdated way of

> referring to women and in 50 years it won't be

> used - unless you are actually a titled lady.

> I for one do not defund it insulting to called a

> woman.

> Now, all you little ladies, I've got stuff to do.

I also hate the label thing. And when being asked if you are Mrs or Miss, but men don't have to state whether they're married because their label doesn't change.


I dislike the connotation thing. Ladies and Gentlemen is fine, men and women is fine, husband and wife is fine. Man and wife? Grrrr. You never hear Woman and Husband!


I think they should be abolished; it's class and gender nonsense.

It's a minefield out there. Opening doors, offering seats, even speaking to someone. Personally, I just go with whatever feels right (generally opening the door, offering the seat, and using 'woman' or 'lady' without conscious thought as to which is more appropriate). If I get it wrong and someone is offended, well, you can't please everybody all the time.

It's not rocket science, so I don't know why people are over-complicating and refusing to understand, unless they're genuinely imbeciles.


Ladies and gentlemen is fine - it's a form of address. Otta, equally, you wouldn't say "hello men" to a group of men - it sounds ridiculous.


But as a description it's asinine. Would you say, "there's a gentleman in my department who..."? No, you'd say, "there's a man in my department". But people persist in saying "lady" in the same circumstances. Or 'lady doctor' and its ilk.


"Lady" is a loaded term - it implies gentility, refinement, delicacy - it comes with a whole set of messages that piss women off because men aren't subjected to the same set of expectations.


If in doubt, where you'd use "man" for the male equivalent, use "woman". Where you'd use "gentleman", use "lady".

"If in doubt, where you'd use "man" for the male equivalent, use "woman". Where you'd use "gentleman", use "lady"."


Well quite, but then I guess some people would use these words where others wouldn't.


Have to say though I don't really see the big deal. If people don't like it, then that's up to them I'm not questioning it. It just seems that there are worse things to get het up about.

RosieH Wrote:


> "Lady" is a loaded term - it implies gentility,

> refinement, delicacy - it comes with a whole set

> of messages that piss women off because men aren't

> subjected to the same set of expectations.


'Loaded term' my elbo. Only in your head. Strange creatures as *Bob* said.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...