Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For me, it's the intelligent folk thinking it's not worth bothering about that's irritating. I'm surprised at both Otta and Pibe thinking such.


If instead, as women, we should bother ourselves with the bigger questions, for instance, the glass ceiling, then I would ask what creates the glass ceiling? The idea that women are less capable, less ruthless in the boardroom, are more refined and gentle than big, burly men? More "ladylike"? More in need of a special pink pen?


It's a pervasive thing. No individual (or very, very few) means offence in using the term. It's the term itself that's the issue. As long as there is equivalency with the word "man", rather than "gentleman" (which comes with its own expectations of behaviour), it perpetuates the notion that women are to be quiet and seemly.


Words have power and I'm surprised to see people deny it.

Rosie.


Interestingly, huge numbers of threads especially in the Family room started by woman start with "Ladies". Do a forum search and scan down ...are these poor repressed woman or is it one of 'them' words that only the oppressed are allowed to use, or possibly does everyone not see it like you without being repressed/unaware or unintelligent?


edited for split infinitive and similar howlers

Nah dufus, do some reading man before you get all smug and sarky.


If you read my post further up, I said I have no problem with it as a form of address, in the same context that you'd use gentlemen. Thus addressing a group of women, "good morning women" sounds odd, in the same way that addressing a group of men as "good morning men" (unless you're on army manoeuvres) sounds odd. In this situation, "ladies" and "gentlemen" seem apposite.


Equivalency.

Oh what a tangle - as a further illustrattion my missus quite often says Come on Ladies to her mates virtually/or in reality ie if they want a night out etc I'd never say come on gentleman/gents in a similar situation. I honestly can't remember for eg when I heard it said in a mixed crowd apart from clearly ironically nor when I last heard it in the workplace in a non-formal setting...though I'm obviously less likely to pick it up. if my kids bump into a woman on Lordship Lane I suspect I will still say "Say sorry to that Lady" but now return to my home fretting that not only am I a perpetuator of stereotypical gendererism but I am socialising my kids with it....maybe. I think my my mum would be mildley offended if a stranger reffered to her as a woman rather than a lady (i will check) but would other woman of a similar age - it's now becoming an ageist/sexist minefield.

"For me, it's the intelligent folk thinking it's

not worth bothering about that's irritating.

I'm surprised at both Otta and Pibe thinking

such."


I believe in picking your battles, and this one just doesn't seem worth fighting when there is far worse embedded sexism in society.


But I promise never to call you a lady (I'm pretty sure I never would have anyway).

Otta, I genuinely believe the language we use to describe a thing has an impact on the way we perceive that thing.


I studied it in the abstract at university, and felt it to be true then. And having come up against a glass ceiling myself, and been acutely aware of the language my male boss used to describe me and other female employees, I could see first hand that the two things were inextricably linked. And in this case, to my detriment.


That's why it's a battle I think is worth fighting - it's part of a bigger battle that I think is worth winning.

I, for one, would be disappointed if the term 'lady' was driven from common use, coupled with the fact that it would never occur to my female acquaintances to object to that term being used as they would see it as a form of politeness . Long may it continue to thrive!

Then there's the New York cabbie who leans out of his window to yell "Hey, move your goddamn ass lady!"

An English cabbie might yell "Move your bleedin' arse woman!" ...is that better?


I've had midle-aged women (in shops or pubs) call me love, darling, chuck and pet (regional variations) for years but only felt able to reply in a similar vein when I was over 30. Before that it was an impersonal "thanks" because "Thanks ma'am" was out of the question and "Thanks missus" made one feel like the artful dodger. "Thanks lady", although still odd-sounding, would have been as useful as "mate" or "pal" back then.


Re quid's missus saying "Come on ladies", I've heard 'girls' used in similar circs by women well past 50 but maybe there are just more alternatives for men: "Come on guys*, fellahs, boys, lads, chaps (usually ironic), gentlemen/gents (ditto for irony), you-bunch-of-fucks **,


*although this is often used for male and female groups

**only really used in a group of close friends

I don't really think too much about it (I'm genuinely not that bothered by the use of Lady vs Women) but when I do, I think I am with RosieH. So much of what defines a word is wrapped up in intent of use. Add to that, established stereotyping and a simple word can then be loaded with all kinds of meaning. So I would only take exception to the use of 'lady' in a specific context.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't really think too much about it (I'm

> genuinely not that bothered by the use of Lady vs

> Women) but when I do, I think I am with RosieH. So

> much of what defines a word is wrapped up in

> intent of use. Add to that, established

> stereotyping and a simple word can then be loaded

> with all kinds of meaning. So I would only take

> exception to the use of 'lady' in a specific

> context.


Hmm.... the tone with which someone says addresses you can be offensive, and if the intent is there then I don't think that an innocent word such as 'lady' or 'gentleman', or even 'woman' or 'man' can necessarily contain the insult - it is more the context.


I don't believe there is any right or wrong here, but I do think it is ill mannered to take offence when clearly none was intended. Some find a man saying 'ladies first' insulting, I find it quite charming and am not at all averse to chivalry :), although I don't expect it. I don't find that chivalry demeans me or insults me - I can hold my own in this world very well, including in a somewhat male dominated workplace - I just see it as one of the many pleasantries that a civilised society can extend to each other.

There's a certain school of thought that would say that you moved off the path because you perceived that as a woman she was so weak and inferior that she required an act of charity.


Whether you buy that interpretation seems to depend very much on your general outlook. It's a pretty ugly one that I'm happy not to share.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...