Jump to content

Recommended Posts

basically it is being proposed by those who know better that if one wishes to purchase cancer sticks,then you need to be a)over 18 and b) purchase a license which you will have to produce in order to by the fags. no license no fags.

as an occasional smoker myself,ie a pint and a fag man it sounds a bit daft,as to be honest the proposed price is only the cost of 30 fags anyway,so its not like its prohibitive. i can see it being aimed more at the younger generations who might baulk at spending a tenner for it,but for the likes of the hardened smoker it wont deter too many.

saying that im looking forward to the day when i,ll be accosted outside shops by kids looking me to buy them fags rather than 4 cans of skol.

The proposal by Professor Julian Le Grand, forcing smokers to apply for a ?10 "permit" to buy cigarettes, which could help people to quit,if they had to apply for an annual permit to "opt in". Apparently, this proposal is one of the Health England group's suggestions to be sent to Lord Darzi, the health minister.

fish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The proposal by Professor Julian Le Grand, forcing

> smokers to apply for a ?10 "permit" to buy

> cigarettes, which could help people to quit,if

> they had to apply for an annual permit to "opt

> in". Apparently, this proposal is one of the

> Health England group's suggestions to be sent to

> Lord Darzi, the health minister.


Prof Le Grand describes his ideas as "Libertarian Paternalism" - which would make my truly libertarian friends cringe. Another proposal is to give school children a "healthy food" swipe card to encourage them to eat apples rather than Big Macs.


I think it's an example of a government in terminal decline. Th "Cones Hot LIne" was a John Major government equivalent.


"Less government interference - more individual liberty" that's my cry - say boo to the nanny state.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fish Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The proposal by Professor Julian Le Grand,

> forcing

> > smokers to apply for a ?10 "permit" to buy

> > cigarettes, which could help people to quit,if

> > they had to apply for an annual permit to "opt

> > in". Apparently, this proposal is one of the

> > Health England group's suggestions to be sent

> to

> > Lord Darzi, the health minister.

>

> Prof Le Grand describes his ideas as "Libertarian

> Paternalism" - which would make my truly

> libertarian friends cringe. Another proposal is to

> give school children a "healthy food" swipe card

> to encourage them to eat apples rather than Big

> Macs.

>

> I think it's an example of a government in

> terminal decline. Th "Cones Hot LIne" was a John

> Major government equivalent.

>

> "Less government interference - more individual

> liberty" that's my cry - say boo to the nanny

> state.



>:D<

cdonline Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's not that bad an idea.

>

> If the problem is discouraging kids from smoking

> and that cigarettes are widely available to those

> under age, it is quite a neat idea.

>

> I haven't heard any other solutions that might

> work.


Legislation / licensing doesn't change anything - unless it is rigorously enforced. Who would enforce this daft proposal and how many of us want this level of intrusive enforcement?

fish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cassius Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Surely we're missing the point - this is a

> chance

> > to make MORE money!

>

>

> What next?


Err, ?72 to get a f***ing passport!!!! That is obscene. Why the f**k should I have to pay a significant sum of money for the right to move upon the face of the planet? And who the f**K CAN JUSTIFY ?72???? eXCUSE THE RANT! nORMAL SERVICE WILL BE RESUMED SHORTLY.

I think its total bollox and yet another chance for the government to scam yet more money out of the average smoker as if the millions they make on the revenue and taxation of cigarettes isn't enough already. The government has to put on a front of pretending to want people to stop smoking (by imposing bans etc. putting the prices exceedingly high etc. advertisments etc.) yet on the other hand still likes and needs the revenue and taxes it gets from them, so to do this will:-


1) get the backing of all those self righteous non-smokers, as they are all just anti-smoking anyway and coming down upon the heads of those who do smoke will just be another plus for them;

2) Bring in yet more money for the government under the guise of "oh its to discourage and help the teenagers to stop" while secretly hoping they will actually be lifetime smokers themselves so as to keep the coifers full and keep the revenue coming in whilst appearing to try to help people stop.


The next thing will be a drinking pass to be purchased and shown at the bar when buying a pint, or how about a fatty or fast food pass? These are all killers aswell, I don't smoke and stopped 5 years ago but for the love of God is there no end to this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • One gentleman who kept the boards up to date with community notices i.e. local residents' association events, East Dulwich Community Centre, sadly died a few years ago. He never had the keys to the NX Rd board as this was outside his ward (now known as Dulwich Hill). The council changed the locks on the boards and we do not know who was given the keys. The gentleman's widow carries on with posting community notices but only on the odd couple of boards whose locks have been broken and she can lift the cover. If I remember correctly, it was the Lib. Dem councillors in ED that initiated the boards.
    • Thanks, that’s very sensible advice  and I’ll most likely follow it. I shouldn’t need anything from them, and if anything, they may end up needing me as they’re likely to go first. Really appreciate your support.
    • Hi Jason - we had very difficult neighbours at some stage. Differently so from yours - aggressive, drinking fairly heavily etc… I tried to accommodate their many demands (and their huge dog who howled all day and used our garden as his toilet) until one day, I just started ghosting them. Cut off contact entirely, blocked their mobile phone number, ignored them when they tried to speak to me. I point blank refused to deal with them, including when they needed my signature to extend the lease to secure their new mortgage, which really panicked them. This proved highly effective and they moved soon after (after I made them sweat to sign the freehold docs they needed) I don’t know if you want to do the same if there is a personality disorder involved. But if you do, make sure all your paperwork is in order and there’s absolutely nothing you need from them.  I’m so sorry you’re going through this. It’s really unpleasant.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...