Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


I'm looking for a great museum to take a lively 2 year old. Would appreciate any recommendations from anyone who may have been recently ( eg perhaps somewhere with good areas for younger children etc)

Horniman is great, but in your view do any one of the major museums cater particularly well for toddlers?


Thank you !

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26473-museums-and-toddlers/
Share on other sites

I took my 5 and 3 yr old to the London transport museum today at Covent Garden and they loved it.There is an indoor picnic area so you can take your own food. The adult ticket is valid for a year (all kids go free) and there's load to touch/climb on. But if you have the choice - don't go in the school holls, it was packed - but we still all had a great time!

London transport museum - trains to climb in etc

Science museum has both launch pad and an area aimed at smaller children in the basement (take spare clothes as there is water play)

Docklands museum has a good area aimed at small children too - mud larks and so does the maritime museum at Greenwich

our boys love all the museums mentioned on here. Especially the transport museum and the science museum (our almost 4yr old loves the space bit and the planes - and the interactive bit on the ground floor near the restaurant at the back. In our experience though, if you want to see any of the science museum then go to the basement bit last - you'll never get out of it otherwise!)


enjoy :-)


H

Bethnal Green museum of childhood has lots of interactive stuff for children (and grown ups, my husband spent a LOT of time with the Meccano)

National Army museum has a great soft play area

Science museum great but packed, museum of London at Docklands quieter, great play area and cafe too.

Have fun

Transport Museum

Discovery Centre.

Aquarium at S Bank (expensive)


Can I make a plea? There are loads of really good educational inter-active sections in museums, and every time we have gone, the 7 and 9 year olds have been trying to get into the exhibits and do the experiments, only to have a parent encourage a 2 or 3 year old to push in and monopolise the exhibit, have fun pulling the levers etc but with no understanding. Find a genuinely toddler-friendly section. Museum of Docklands has a great section in the basement.

It's a bit further away, but the National Army museum next to the Chelsea Pensioners Home off the Kings Road is great. There are lots of exhibits plus a fab soft play zone in the basement which my 2 year old daughter loves. Free entry to the museum plus only ?2.50 or so for an hour in the soft play. Cafe isn't too bad either!

You make an interesting point but 2 and 3 year olds should be encouraged to explore and be curious, yes it is annoying for 7 and 9 year olds but they may have learnt a few very helpful social skills like waiting, patience and empathy for those less able than themselves; to me that's a better lesson for life than just getting on with the experiments. And with the v short attention spans of little ones the incursion into their own explorations is likely to be short-lived.


I don't think toddlers/preschoolers or children should only be kept in areas focused on their age group either - despite showing what you consider to be no understanding, little ones learn so much from seeing what the next stage is and what older children/adults are up to.


Carbonara Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Can I make a plea? There are loads of really good

> educational inter-active sections in museums, and

> every time we have gone, the 7 and 9 year olds

> have been trying to get into the exhibits and do

> the experiments, only to have a parent encourage a

> 2 or 3 year old to push in and monopolise the

> exhibit, have fun pulling the levers etc but with

> no understanding. Find a genuinely

> toddler-friendly section. Museum of Docklands has

> a great section in the basement.

I'll second this. I work in a Museum, and although not speaking for all Museum's, would say that in ours many exhibitions - although aimed at maybe a certain age group - Key stage 1 and up/teenage to adult etc - are usually designed to be inclusive to most age groups. We would certainly never want anyone to feel excluded from an exhibit/exhibition. I guess its down to common courtesy for ANYONE visiting to be mindful of the needs of other visitors - be it exploring toddlers or older children really getting in to the exhibits.


H


bluesuperted Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You make an interesting point but 2 and 3 year

> olds should be encouraged to explore and be

> curious, yes it is annoying for 7 and 9 year olds

> but they may have learnt a few very helpful social

> skills like waiting, patience and empathy for

> those less able than themselves; to me that's a

> better lesson for life than just getting on with

> the experiments. And with the v short attention

> spans of little ones the incursion into their own

> explorations is likely to be short-lived.

>

> I don't think toddlers/preschoolers or children

> should only be kept in areas focused on their age

> group either - despite showing what you consider

> to be no understanding, little ones learn so much

> from seeing what the next stage is and what older

> children/adults are up to.

>

> Carbonara Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Can I make a plea? There are loads of really

> good

> > educational inter-active sections in museums,

> and

> > every time we have gone, the 7 and 9 year olds

> > have been trying to get into the exhibits and

> do

> > the experiments, only to have a parent encourage

> a

> > 2 or 3 year old to push in and monopolise the

> > exhibit, have fun pulling the levers etc but

> with

> > no understanding. Find a genuinely

> > toddler-friendly section. Museum of Docklands

> has

> > a great section in the basement.

Those of us with older children wanting to get the best out of carefully structured educational material were also parents of toddlers, of course!


I'm not saying 'banish the toddlers' or any such thing. But if a child is absorbed in a process, as planned and provided by the museum at considerable expense, why should that be the moment they are interupted so that a toddler can have a bit of a romp? Why does that have to be the moment that the older child learns to appreciate the needs of younger children? I am only suggesting that indulgent parents of toddlers recognise that older children's needs can be respected too.


Of course toddlers should be in musems and encouraged to be curious and find things out (as mine were), but not if older children are expected to be sabotaged by parents who think their toddlers rights to push in and interrupt other people's enjoyment and engagement are paramount. Remember I used phrases like 'push in' and 'monopolise' and that parents 'encourage' both.


Launchpad at the Science Museum has some great exhibits and some take a bit of time to generate results and understand them. Older children can't get the benefit if a toddler interrupts every single time. It isn't aimed at toddlers.

As a parent of an older child AND toddlers I can see Carbonara's point. Our oldest one will spend a while helping watch our little ones (3 under 5) in the children's garden area before we go to the launch pad /

- whenever we can we take an extra adult or go with another family so we can split into two groups though so he can really concentrate on the activities


There is, though, in the launch pad the thing with the plastic lentils and the winch basket which is about as far as my little ones get, they love it! They don't tend to stray far from there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said I thought it was targeted or deliberate. There also has never been a “stand off” or confrontation, we’ve spoken to them in a friendly manner about it. Our experience is they don’t seem to care. That’s the frustrating thing for us, if someone politely raises a concern at least take a second to reflect. Treat others how you would want to be treated.  I don’t want them to lose their job, far from it. But considering it could cost me a days work to fix any damage, I’m within my right to try prevent it.   
    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...