Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Apparently it is OK for 150-300 people be crammed into a narrow sealed metal tube with wings for hours as long as they are wearing a mask, but must sit 200m apart in theatres and cinemas for 90 minutes thus making them unviable.


(Yes the 200m is an exaggeration but I?m trying to make a point)


I?m all for social distancing, but the double standards considering what the creative industries are going through is shocking. The airline lobby has deeper pockets of course.

The rules affecting the creative industries are awful but I think for cinemas the biggest issue is the lack of films being released to draw customers in. It's a vicious circle as movie companies don't want to release anything as they fear it won't recoup the revenue - Bond being the classic example - they need packed cinemas to get a return on investment.

RoundTable Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently it is OK for 150-300 people be crammed

> into a narrow sealed metal tube with wings for

> hours as long as they are wearing a mask, but must

> sit 200m apart in theatres and cinemas for 90

> minutes thus making them unviable.

>

> (Yes the 200m is an exaggeration but I?m trying to

> make a point)

>

> I?m all for social distancing, but the double

> standards considering what the creative industries

> are going through is shocking. The airline lobby

> has deeper pockets of course.



Much of Air Travel is essential. Going to the Cinema is Not.


When I say Essential I mean for Airlines to survive.

If Airlines go under then there would be no air travel when the Virus is over.


Airlines cost Billions of pounds to maintain and rely on aircraft being in the air and Not on the ground.

The economy needs air travel.

I suspect Picturehouse is more viable as it has smaller venues and it's clientele is not just motivated by "blockbusters".


Also, this leak of the letter is part of the, understandable, lobbying the creative industry is doing to the government for more help.


So hopefully it won't come to the temporary closures that are being discussed as it is in no-ones interests for 5,500 being made redundant (even if the expectation is that they would be re-employed when the cinemas are able to reopen).

This is an excellent idea. Would be great too for kids getting to see a wider range of films not just whatever is trendy at the time. And make the tickets affordable. I looked up a ticket for the cinema in Victoria and it is ?18 per adult, so I declined. For families who have seen a reduced income ?18 a ticket is bonkers (it is bonkers anyway but even more so now).






Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The rules affecting the creative industries are

> awful but I think for cinemas the biggest issue is

> the lack of films being released to draw customers

> in. It's a vicious circle as movie companies don't

> want to release anything as they fear it won't

> recoup the revenue - Bond being the classic

> example - they need packed cinemas to get a return

> on investment.

The papers today are also suggesting that it is the paucity of good quality (i.e. likely to be popular) new releases which is precipitating the announced closures - Tenet didn't do well for instance. Maybe the poor weather will encourage more attendance (if there's anything decent to watch) - but it's a bit of a chicken and egg situation - without good films audiences won't come - if audiences aren't coming there's no point in releasing good films.

Cora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With so few places as the bad weather draws in

> couldn't the cinemas show ongoing old classics -

> twice the shows but half the audience? I know it's

> the bigger picture for the organisation but would

> be so sad to see it go....



East Dulwich currently listing some classic Hitchcock amongst others so hopefully staying open?


HP

Cora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With so few places as the bad weather draws in

> couldn't the cinemas show ongoing old classics -

> twice the shows but half the audience? I know it's

> the bigger picture for the organisation but would

> be so sad to see it go....



Odeon is doing this soon, ?5 tickets to see 80s classics like Dirty Dancing and Back to the Future on the big screen

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cora Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > With so few places as the bad weather draws in

> > couldn't the cinemas show ongoing old classics

> -

> > twice the shows but half the audience? I know

> it's

> > the bigger picture for the organisation but

> would

> > be so sad to see it go....

>

>

> Odeon is doing this soon, ?5 tickets to see 80s

> classics like Dirty Dancing and Back to the Future

> on the big screen


Matinees - I'm not a great cinema goer so may have little idea here but they were really popular once

Wasn't the ?5 a ticket model how Peckhamplex operated until it too closed a couple of weeks ago?


I think a large proportion of the public are now completely petrified of doing things like going to the cinema. They have been scared witless by the government and the mayor that they will die if they leave the house.


Even showing old classics to a cinema with 2 guests inside is not a viable way to do business.

I don't know - I'm not that scared but when I go to the pub I like to stand at the bar not sit alone at a table.


Maybe some kind of similar thing is happening and people don't like the new normal. Maybe I should try a pint alone in the corner of one of the quieter pubs - if this isn't going away. We all may have to get used to this :(

Cineworld and Picturehouse are losing more money by keeping them open for the few people who are coming in to watch classic films than to close.


It 'should' save their business to keep it closed for now, but the fear is that the studios will move to the streaming model where they can charge more than a cinema to the customer direct to watch on their tv.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Most reliable sources show Tenet having done

> extremely well. Especially in the UK so I don't

> know why people are saying otherwise.



When we went to see it (in ED) there were only two other people there.


I realise that's rather a small sample 🤣

The whole concept of streaming directly to a customer by the studios is half the reason cinemas declined back in the 80s when films were available on VHS so people put off going as renting it was cheaper then going to the cinema

After a few years technology changed in the cinemas and people fell in love with the big screen again so numbers went up again.


If the studios go down the path of streaming then whilst convenient for some, the cinemas won't survive after this pandemic which will result in a lost revenue stream for the studios (people who go to the cinema are often tempted to buy and rewatch the film at home after)


Today "the Batman" and Dune movies followed bond by delaying their launch dates which is another reason cinemas are temporarily closing their doors as there aren't enough good new films to draw the audiences in. Can't blame the Studios for their decision as they need to recoup the production costs but by the same token they aren't doing enough to maintain the cinema chains through the next 6 months.


Let's hope and pray that the Picturehouse chain and peckham plex have the good fortune to weather this situation as I for one miss the big screen experience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry but I think it's best if people just check things for themselves when they buy things. In three shops/restaurants (from some years back) I just avoid the places concerned, as in all three  cases I was pretty sure it wasn't a genuine mistake, and in one case it happened more than once and usually late at night.
    • Sorry Sue - me again. This has been on my mind all day, it's a big bug bear of mine. If you don't mind - please can you private message me some of these shops so I can cross reference / add to my AVOID list.  Thanks in advance. Let's make sure this doesn't happen this Christmas, particularly as we head into sales season. Even more problematic in my experience.
    • Pity you didn't quote what you are referring to, Mal. I didn't see the previous post, and my mind is boggling 😮
    • The Cherry Tree was absolutely excellent for a while when a youngish couple ran it and brought in a really good chef. It was them who renamed it The Cherry Tree. They were really turning it around. The chef did fantastic Scotch eggs, and one of the best roasts I've ever had. If memory serves the then owner,  for some reason known only to himself, took a dislike to them and what they were doing and sacked them all. And yes we weren't expecting a top class  meal last Christmas, and we left it too late to book anywhere else, but we weren't expecting it for a hundred pounds EACH to be quite as terrible as it was. Stupid us. Not sure why you are confused by my post, Jazzer? Did I misremember? Now it's got even more confusing because my posts have been merged and your confused emoji is shown at the bottom of the second one instead of the first 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...