Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I notice from the London Gazette that Dulwich Life was 'allegedly' in court last Wednesday 13th February. A petition to wind up the company was presented last October by the rag's printer and finally made its way to court under the Insolvency Act.


No doubt the printers were unpaid and it must have been a lot of money, if I recall correctly the mag claimed a circulation of 20,000. Yeah, right - per annum maybe. Yet I doubt if the print run was more than 500 a month.


Still, does anyone know if this court case was actually heard and what of the outcome?


To its readers Dulwich Life may well have seemed friendly and appealing, but talk to anyone who dealt with the company itself and a very different view emerges. Indeed this recent legal footnote is a reminder that ignoring the creditors who help establish your business, is unlikely to reap any lasting rewards.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2666-dulwich-life-death-rattle/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Remember, you never know what someone else is going through behind closed doors....
    • Is anyone else having difficulty booking Silver Swim sessions (Tuesday and Thursday between 3pm-4pm?) Almost all the spaces are taken before the online booking system opens at 10pm several days before. Last night there appeared to be one space available for next Tuesday. I tried to book at one second past 10pm but was unsuccessful. This seems to have been a recent phenomenon. I made a telephone call this morning but just received a recorded message saying that the voicemail box was full. Am I right in assuming that in person bookings are now taking precedence over online ones?
    • I completely agree with you, Angelina. But it's worth noting that no one else has a problem with her, or finds her rude /  has mentioned her aggressively banging gates / ringing doorbells etc. 
    • But I don't think that was what you meant, was it? But he can hardly be held responsible for what somebody else did! Just discovered I forgot to post the above  last night, and now it's overtaken by long posts.  I don't have sufficient knowledge  to counter some of what has been said above, some of which appears to be opinion rather than facts, so it would be pointless for me to say anything else.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...