Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I gave some stuff to David, the bric-a-brac shop owner on Upland Rd. We agreed he'd try to sell it for ?60 (it was easily worth that). 6 months and about a dozen visits later, he won't give me the money or my things back. There's no sign of the stuff in his shop. He always fobs me off with some excuse why he can't pay - recently simply claiming he has no cash. It doesn't seem to bother him that he's basically just stolen my stuff. And he seemed like such a nice chap too...
You would hope that if you took your possessions to a local established bric a brac shop that you wouldn't need a written agreement, but sadly I guess you do. I don't think that would stop you from seeking legal recourse in the small claims court. It might be worth having a word with the local police station - phone them first?
A verbal agreemnet is binding in law, if he won't pay up just take stuff off the shelves to the value of your goods. Remember he will have added a mark up to his goods. The moral of the story is don't give anything to anyone without payment up front.

Post a Lampoon on his window telling the whole world of his shoddy behaviour!



noun

1.

a sharp, often virulent satire directed against an individual or institution; a work of literature, art, or the like, ridiculing severely the character or behaviour of a person, society, etc.

He's actually alright and a decent bloke who's taken back stuff for me. But he's disorganised and I doubt the place takes much at all so not the best play if it mattered to you. Why didn't you ebay it if was worth anything? Best sorted out offline?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good thinking, Gidget.

>

> How about round-the-clock surveillance with a SWAT

> team on standby?


You know all those ''what's that helicoptor doing?'' threads? Say no more...

@stephen509 - that was my thought, but there's nothing here I want

@KidKruger - I asked for one, but he persuaded me that he didn't work that way!

@Chillaxed - yes

@DJKillaQueen - wise words

@right-clicking - nice idea

@MrBen - yes, I liked him too. Spoken to him on a few occasions before giving him the stuff. I do occasionally use eBay, but it seemed like too much hassle for these items.

@Annette - Yes, he's a very mellow, friendly guy (even when he's telling you he won't pay you!) And yes, the stuff was definitely worth at least ?60 - it was all good quality.

@Gidget - I'd rather not do that


I'm going to keep asking him for my cash (or stuff back) whenever I go past. One day he may pay. Just thought others should know in case you are entering into a similar "deal" with him.

Does he agree he has your goods (and does he agree what the list of goods is).

Does he agree he promised you a certain amount ?

Ask him.

If he does agree, ask for your money or goods.

If he refuses/makes further excuses say you'll proceed now through small claims court.

Be polite.


But make sure you have someone with you who is not related / your partner, to 'witness', they don't need to be stood beside you, they could have happened to stroll-up previously and be browsing at the time you approach the shopkeeper...


Personally I would record it, given the circumstances, but that's probably not recommended by most.

I've used recorded phone calls in court to counter lies, even though I had no permission to record from the opponent. Nothing quite like the recording demonstrating the complete opposite of what the liar is saying, very humbling for the liar - the arrogance suddenly diminishes and the court's patience with them starts to wane.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...