Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Received a letter today saying permission granted for this, under regulation 13(1)(b) of the NHS (Pharmacy svs ) Regs 2005. Disappointed , but happy that needle and syringe exchange services are not being commissioned by the pct. from a quick review seems like the dye was set following a review in 2001.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27004-dmc-pharmacy/
Share on other sites

Interestingly, despite objections from 3 local pharmacy businesses, dame tessa, the lib dems with a petition of 1,083 people, LINK southwArk with a further 31 representations including the Bara Association (local tenants),Gumboots after school club, Gumboots nursery and others, it still got approved. Local democracy in action.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27004-dmc-pharmacy/#findComment-595709
Share on other sites

If you had a million pound mansion in Dulwich, you would want to follow every avenue to make money out of your very lucrative medical centre, and the upkeep of your many property developments.

The surgery already looks like a fairground with its flu jab banners.

Money could have been spent on new computers and trained operators, and a lift installed for people who cannot manage the stairs. and maybe a cleaner with copius supplies of disinfectants and air sprays, a pharmacy would be too much for the confused staff.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27004-dmc-pharmacy/#findComment-597077
Share on other sites

Hi LadyDeliah,

I think the neighbours are miffed at the idea of a pharmacy - a shop by another name - opening close to them for 100hours a week with all the deliveries, visitors, extra parking pressure. Espeically when a nuber of existing pharmacies within 500m located on existing shopping streets. To gain pharmacy permission to open 100hours pw they've also included a needle exchange. The iste is next ot a large nursery and the parents of children are concerned.

We don't need another needles exchange in the area when a number already exist.


Would you like a new shop next door open for 100hours a week?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27004-dmc-pharmacy/#findComment-597102
Share on other sites

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's wrong with having a pharmacy in the

> surgery? It would make life simpler for people who

> don't have much spare time.


I Totally agree....


People with late appointments at DMC often find it is too late to get down to the Chemists to get their script.


Elderly / Disabled people who have difficulty walking whould find this service beneficial.

Also people with small children.


Nearest Pharmacy is LLoyds. Great service there, but another Multi-national with 100's branches.


Tarot:-


Where would they put a lift. ??

Lift not required as appointments can be made in the downstairs surgeries.


I bet if they wanted to open a tea & cakes shop with 'Buggie Park' there would be no objection.

But anything usefull gets the big No No.


Fox.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27004-dmc-pharmacy/#findComment-597116
Share on other sites

I'm not saying I need another Pharmacy. I use LLoyds. I used it today.


James was seemed to suggest protecting local businesses. Well LLoyds is not a local

business. It is a Multi- national.


I do not constantly think just about myself, but am concerned about those less mobile.


The point I was making was that people are saying We do not need another Pharmmacy


Well we do not need another Mummy Club Tea Shop.... but no one would complain if yet anotherone opened at DMC.


Fox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27004-dmc-pharmacy/#findComment-597179
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...