Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This really is not that complicated. We do not need to consult Victorian maps with old parishes. Many parts of London were once part of Kent, Surrey etc and its totally irrelevant. Ask someone who grew up in that part of SE London and they will tell you its Peckham. Ask someone who grew up in ED in the 60s and they will tell you the area we are talking about is Peckham. Why all of a sudden people want to change that is odd. That part of Peckham is nicer than many parts of East Dulwich like I've said on another thread but that's no reason for its residents to decide to disown Peckham.
How is it that Grove Vale on both sides is SE22 and the roads leading off it like Coplestone, Oglander, Ondine are SE15? Also, the new development off Coplestone is SE22 and it was only recently built. St. John's Church is SE22 and the school that belongs to is on Adys Rd. SE15.

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How is it that Grove Vale on both sides is SE22

> and the roads leading off it like Coplestone,

> Oglander, Ondine are SE15? Also, the new

> development off Coplestone is SE22 and it was only

> recently built. St. John's Church is SE22 and the

> school that belongs to is on Adys Rd. SE15.



Because the postcode indicates the sorting office any given street is allocated to, presumably based around distance from the office, size and capacity of the office etc. nothing to do with an area as it sits in people's perception.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The forest hill thing was meant to be a joke. The

> point is, we live in 2012, and no one except for

> you would conside Bellenden Road to be part of

> East Dulwich. It's not even borderline close.

>

> You say that post codes don't count because they

> came in around WW1. I dread to think what you

> think about Israel!


Have you consulted the MAPS Otta?

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How is it that Grove Vale on both sides is SE22

> and the roads leading off it like Coplestone,

> Oglander, Ondine are SE15? Also, the new

> development off Coplestone is SE22 and it was only

> recently built. St. John's Church is SE22 and the

> school that belongs to is on Adys Rd. SE15.


The land where the Dog Kennel Hill Sainsbury's was built was originally in SE5.


This yhen mysteriously changed to SE22.


So instead of a Camberwell Sainsbury's we have (East) Dulwich Sainsbury's.


John K

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Dulwich LIbrary is a good border marker.


This goes back to landscape history.


This part of the western East Dulwich boundary follows the watershed between the Peck and Effra valleys.


John

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> John K,

> When did the SE5 into SE22 happen? That is just

> bizarre.


I believe that anyne can apply to have a postcode changed. We could ask Sainsbury's if they did. I don't know the exact date.


> The flats opposite Sainsburys - Dog Kennel Hill

> Estate? are all SE22 which is also a bit random.

> Were they also SE5 at one point?


I beliee they were always in SE22. Somewhere I have Kelly's Post Office Directory Maps for 1922 and 1946 but it may take several days to find them. These can provide clarification.


John K

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oddly, Bessemer Grange is SE5 even thought is

> fully surrounded by other postcodes.


Probably orphaned as a result of the Sainsbury's change.


> Anyway, who cares... The history is interesting

> of course but its not the most important thing in

> life!


And in 2012 it is interesting to know that East Dulwich is not limited to the SE22 post code.


John K

My understanding from the map is the same as Otta - is it that you've simply conflated the St. John's parish with East Dulwich John? It seems a bit arbitrary. It doesn't even have the name East Dulwich?


Strikes me you can define an area in many ways:


Legacy church parish boundaries

Postcode

Electoral ward

Distance from the train station


Whilst all of these have their failings, I think it would be overplaying one's hand to claim any of them were definitively 'wrong'?


Most people's interpretation seem to be a loose amalgam of all four definitions.

Burbage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the-e-dealer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Verbiage seems to think that zpopulations

> > never change and MPs should get an easy ride.

>

> Not quite. I meant that the Boundary Commission

> aren't the best people to ask where anywhere

> happens to be, simply because their answer will

> necessarily reflect their opinion (or lack of it)

> at a particular moment in time, and their opinion

> is not the same as my opinion, nor does it

> necessarily coincide with the opinions of

> cartographers, historians, Postal Czars or those

> with houses to sell. To elaborate the point, they

> are the arbiters of democratic expedience rather

> than geographical truth, and have no monopoly on

> the matter, save with respect to electoral

> concerns which, with respect to the e-dealer, are

> far from the only possible concerns.

>

> Consider this: if everyone within the current

> electoral boundaries went to live in Margate,

> leaving the place devoid of human inhabitants,

> East Dulwich would cease to exist in the mind of

> the Electoral Commission. Yet, to anyone else, the

> impudent persistence of the Railway Station, the

> Sorting Office and the Palm Tree Roundabout would

> clearly attest to it continuing to be a place.

>

> Happily, given the question was what your (or, in

> my case, my) opinion of where the East Dulwich

> boundaries are (or by implication, should be), the

> question of whether the Boundary Commission is or

> is not an infallible bureacratic ornament becomes

> entirely irrelevant.

>

> Given the level of interest in the issue, I have

> sacrificed a portion of my afternoon in pursuit of

> enlightenment and am now in the happy position of

> being able to publish the results here for the

> benefit of all. I trust no further clarification

> will be required.


Looks like I don't live in east dulwich anymore on the basis of this analysis. Seeing as I am just south of the junction of Goodrich and Friern I find that a bit surprising.

Exactly!


Who knows, things are always changing. Maybe within a generation all of south Peckham will be seen as part of ED and people will wonder why the station is called Peckham Rye when its in ED ect. It could happen but the point is it hasn't happened yet and certainly wasn't the case even 10 years ago. The efforts of some to suggest it should be this way therefore seem suspect.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For the Hipsters among us (Mick?) surely Peckham

> is where you wanna be nowadays, in 5 years time

> everyone in North East Dulwich will be trying to

> say they are in Peckham...


Yes - very hip. hop. me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can’t say I approve but equally staff can vote with their feet. Cabs to collect and deliver - not bad.Maybe Gail’s know something none of us do… Having said that, sure those that are walking in and around Dulwich might prefer cake, hot drinks etc in a venue that is not a pub with the noise from over loud punters… so guess one waits and sees…  Do take some pics or let us know if people are popping in… my guess is yes… 
    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...