Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks for this; will take a careful look and respond. My immediate interest is from Vauxhall onwards since I cycle via Herne Hill now because Camberwell New Road is so unpleasant.


Immediate thoughts are that I am very glad to see right turns being proposed along Vauxhall Bridge Road. I definitely prefer option 2 as far as going over Vauxhall Bridge. I would far rather share a wider space with a few buses than end up on a shared pavement with pedestrians running for trains and dodging around walkers into the cycle lane. Flus for those of us who want to filter over to turn right along South Lambeth Road, it will be easier to do so. The new 'early bird' lights only help if you arrive at a point where the lights are red. If you are in free flowing traffic, getting off the pavement and over will be tricky.


I'd also prefer the road option for the gyratory but could see that less confident cyclists might prefer the shared footpath option.


I am not convinced by it stopping at Neathouse Place as it does. It handholds and then dumps cyclists at the start of the horrible one way system. There is no easy/direct way to get to the western end of Victoria St on two wheels. It's either taking your chances with multiple lanes of traffic around Bressenden Place, going on a detour through the back streets round St Vincent Square (incidentally also full of one-way streets) or getting off the bike and manoeuvring it through already crowded pavements.


Am less familiar cycling the roads around Peckham but it does seem to address the bits that I've noticed weren't great in the past. It might make me covert my route! How well does it link up with the old canal path etc?

Just got the leaflet for this through my door. The phrase I'm worried about is "new mandatory cycle lanes". What does "mandatory" mean? On days when I feel sprightly I happily bike round Vauxhall Cross on the road without using the poorly-designed cycle "solution". Ditto for the Elephant. Is this now a proposal to prevent cyclists from using stretches of road which are deemed (by non-cyclists) to be "too dangerous", and instead to use the "mandatory" cycle solution? That would be a terrifying prospect. I emailed the consultation email address two days ago to ask about this, but so far have not received a reply.
Don't worry; a mandatory cycle lane has a solid white line which motorised vehicles aren't allowed into and, I believe , could be penalised for. An advisory cycle lane has a striped line and vehicles can use. They're not to do with whether cyclists have to use them. Having said that, in practice there's no real difference. Motorcycles still end up using the mandatory lane on the Embankment and cars park in the one at Battersea Park.
  • 6 months later...

The consultation response is now available from http://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/cycling/cs5


TfL has now "decided to substantially recast the previous proposals for some sections of CS5", which means that, up to the Oval, quite a lot of the changes have been abandoned or postponed. But not the 20mph limit in Camberwell (the town centre and Peckham High Street/Peckham Road), which will be going ahead.


From the Oval to the centre of town, including the Vauxhall Gyratory, all the plans are back on the drawing board, and there'll apparently be another consultation on those later. That means the really horrid bits are going to stay horrid for a while longer, but at least they won't be getting worse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...