Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

mary123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Group of adults standing and dancing around a

> stereo on the hill, been there for bout an hour,

> do they know something I do not know about social

> distancing or the pandemic??



At 2am in this weather??? Wow! they must be desperate to get out and party

mary123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Group of adults standing and dancing around a

> stereo on the hill, been there for bout an hour,

> do they know something I do not know about social

> distancing or the pandemic??


Maybe they know that the Death count from Covid is vastly exaggerated, dying with Covid is not the same as dying of Covid. If you are in a Hospice dying of cancer but have covid its counted as a Covid death, all the while Flu, Heart attack and Stroke death numbers are drastically down for the last year https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-uk-overestimates-coronavirus-death-toll.html and 80% of infections have very mild flu-like symptoms

oh dear upland......that link is 8 months old from July last year. If anything the COVID deaths are underestimated. Excess deaths may be a better indicator, there are many other ways but the general consensus seems to be we are already at 150,000. Maybe those people on Dawsons Hill are using their brains as little as you are

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...