Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We didn't get any of our 6 choices and allocated a school that I am disappointed with. I emailed Southwark and got a speedy response. We basically have no chance except for one school for which we are VERY high on the list. I am going to contact the school tomorrow though to double confirm our position

Indie1399 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We didn't get any of our 6 choices and allocated a

> school that I am disappointed with. I emailed

> Southwark and got a speedy response. We basically

> have no chance except for one school for which we

> are VERY high on the list. I am going to contact

> the school tomorrow though to double confirm our

> position



We got our 3rd choice - fairly happy but means the catchment at the moment for our 1st choice is tiny! Did Southwark tell you where on the waiting list you are? If so I?ll drop them an email.

Catchments are getting smaller, at this rate it will be 2m to either charter, and you?ve got to wonder where are all these children coming from? I think Southwark must be very grateful to all the private schools around them since they take so many children off their hands!


Also, I wonder why southwark schools don?t do like other boroughs, where a percentage of the places are for primaries in the surrounding areas.


I suspect rentals around the charters are a booming industry!

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?m 503m as the crow flies or 593m according to a

> postcode to postcode website from Charter East

> which was the only school I put on the application

> since it?s the closest.


I assume you?ve been offered a place at that distance?

Monkey hi! (Secondary school warrior friend)

I believe the distance they publish is the March distance not the September distance




Monkey Wrote:







-------------------------------------------------------

> NorthDulMum, the distance Charter states on its

> website is the furthest place allocated as of

> September. The March distance will be much

> smaller.

Hihi - i had a long chat last year with the Charter North admissions officer who explained that they use the September post-shakedown figure because the initial March catchment is so small and not representative of the true furthest place allocated etc... But perhaps they?ve changed how they do things.
We?ve also missed out on our first choice of ED Charter, live just under 800m away. I am hearing through friends about families who own houses further afield in East Dulwich renting nearer to the school to get in. This is all hearsay at the moment so don't know if it's true or not but if my son misses out on a place due to this happening I will be furious! Does anyone know do the school or Southwark council investigate / do checks for admissions cheats?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We had a take-away from Aroma Lab last night. I was impressed, utterly delicious stir fried tofu and sweet and sour chicken. Generous portions too… will definitely make a habit of eating their home-cooked food. 
    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...