Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

The bloke on Channel 4 news shouting his interview at Owen Patterson is annoying me. Patterson also annoyed me by calling it the Food Safety Agency rather than 'standards'


Government is there to set the standards/safety framework not chew our food before we eat it.


Horsemeat is in the foodchain either due to carelessness or fraud.


Enforcement authorities (eg trading standards or the police) will take action as necessary


It is up the producers and retailers to operate due dilligence and have traceability in place.


It is unlikely to be a safety problem, no one has died and I don't think that their is a rush to the bogs.


If you meat eaters ensure that you are eating British beef it probably would never have happened.


Fraudsters are always attempting to substitute inferior products - orange juice is a good international example.


Ross foods once mixed up their veggie mince, for that awful Linda McCartney brand with beef, didn't hear all the whinging then.


Dull story.

LondonLogCo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you reckon that's Findus done for as a brand

>

> Remember what happened to Fray Bentos ? Still ,

> they bounced back as "Tynne Brand" and everyone

> *ahem* rushed out to buy it again.


Not really. Tyne Brand is owned by Westlers, whereas Fray Bentos was Premier Foods (and may still be). Premier may have offloaded the brand, or be trying to, but the pies are still available, though whether they're any different, or even produced in different factories, is another question. But in the world of brands it's what's on the packet that matters, not what's in it.


The last major big-brand scandal I remember illustrates this nicely. John West was hit, back in 1978, when botulism was found in a batch of tinned salmon. Although it was owned by Unilever, it was a proper company with real money, ran it's own European fleet of fishing boats and its own canning factories. In other words, it had more to rely on than just a name, and could still catch fish and tin them, even when demand for its own label hit rock bottom. That meant it could survive, even in the face of the prolonged consumer boycott that followed, if only by tinning stuff from the supermarkets that had removed its own name from the shelves. As a result, it's doing well now, and even though it's now owned by a Thai company running boats out of Ghana, it still catches and packs its own fish.


Findus is a bit different. It's just a brand - one name out of many in the portfolios of private equity outfits that used to relate to specific companies but are now just licenced out to whoever cares to pay. The owners are middlemen who happen to have bought a logo, and this story is all about middlemen - whether the exploitative suppliers of dead horse, the processors who construct the 'meals' or the logisticians and contract-swappers who palm off one against the other and will, I imagine, be finding out that the only thing they didn't outsource was the risk. As such, there's no real business to protect. Just the 'brand awareness' that's been built up through advertising over the decades, and that's a lot more fragile than a proper company. However deft their PR agency's response, it will break the suspension of disbelief that the advertising relies on - that Findus is a company that actually produces stuff, rather than a beige collection of dusty skimmers, juggling licences, contracts and invoices in a disembodied pretence of adding value.


Although it's not the first brand to be affected, and the supermarkets are likely to continue to support it (as they're almost obliged to do, given their own problems), I suspect it's doomed, at least in the short term. Although it's not a premium brand, their customers do pay a little over own-brand prices, and I doubt they'll be happy to find they've been doing that for a product that's, at best, no better.


I may be wrong. There's no accounting for what people will pay for, and some popular brands, while perversely famous for the shoddiness of their goods, still carry on peddling tat to people who like the comfort of a familiar name. Even if it does disappear for a while, there's a reasonable chance of it being resurrected later, either by the current owners or some nostalgic chancer of the future, when the fuss has been flattened. It's a fairly rubbish basis for a business, but it's a fairly rubbish world, and you can't help but grudgingly respect those with the callousness to make money out of it.

I'm guessing Malumbu is a Civil Servant because I haven't read a more ignorant comment on this story. The whole food production chain is regulated by the EU, having replaced the UK regulatory regime - NOT the Food Standards Agency.


The FSA can only check any product if they have firm evidence of a prior problem. In other words, they cannot carry out preventative checks at point of entry or production - this is illegal under EU law as discrimination on the ground of nationality.


Now a problem has emerged, then the FSA can involve itself and the police - both here and in Europe. Stable door, horse bolted etc.


This is an exact replica of the breast implant and hip replacement problems, and is another perfect example of EU regularory failure. Our own internal systems in all these cases is entirely dependant on the good faith and efficiency of EU member states in maintaining standards and to make sure that what is in the boxes is what is on the EU-regulated tin.


And, of course, it has AGAIN been shown to be a complete failure.

That's an unnecessarily anti EU agenda there Top Banana.


The FSA has NEVER been in the business of making preventative spot checks by DNA profiling meat at point of entry.


So your suggestion that they have been handicapped by the EU is utter bollocks.


The common market was created with a view to LOWERING handicaps to business when trading overseas, in order to drive productivity and growth.


It means that the same rules apply to operating within the EU as within the UK. It is the responsibility of the distributor to check that their supplier is up to scratch.


Your proposal to spot check every supplier in every deal would be the enemy of business throughout the UK.


As is standard in these situations, I wonder what the motivation is for people to fabricate allegations about the EU.

Wot bolloxs top banana


Food Safety Act 1990. Food must comply with food safety requirements, must be "of the nature, substance and quality demanded", and must be correctly described (labelled).


Enforcement authorities = trading standards, port health, environmental health, meat hygience service. All national bodies. Lots of cross EU working, standards etc, but enforcement in this country is national. Central government (ie FSA) does not generally enforce (there are powers to the Health Secretary) but FSA does have the powers to carry out surveillance where there is a possible hygiene or standards issue. Eg the adulteration of orange juice, factory vs farmed salmon and other areas where there is a quick buck to be made.


Interesting that FSA was set-up as MAFF was considered too close to the manufactures and producers. But FSA has been considerably down sized, and food labelling has gone back to MAFF (ie Defra).

The FSA was indeed created by the Food Act 1990 and is currently still capable of food inspection. However, their own strategy 2015 document states that -:


"If we become aware that food contains unsafe ingredients, or is labelled in a way that makes it unsafe for some people to eat, we will have it removed from sale. We do this in conjunction with other enforcement organisations, such as port health authorities, trading standards and environmental health."


http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/strategy20102015.pdf


I have never disputed that. I have no doubt that nearly all the UK food network points are adhereing to current regulations. However, note the little "IF", there. They cannot proactivly test and/or check food imports from the EU. They are not allowed to under EU law.


Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 implements the HACCP strategy across the EU.


http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/hygienelegislation/guidance_doc_haccp_en.pdf


As Lord Haskins (former chairman of Northern Foods) stated on Today this morning -:


"You can't get away from the odd cheat or the odd failure, but this is so widespread, it's endemic, it's institutional fraud right across the piece. Thousands of people must be aware of what?s going on. There's a huge amount of form-filling going on by the way. Everybody fills in forms to say they are doing the right thing but they don't actually go and look at the factory to see what is happening inside the factory".


That is my point. Everybody is making sure the boxes are ticked whilst ignoring the failures and fraud.


"It came from abattoirs in Romania through a dealer in Cyprus working through another dealer in Holland to a meat plant in the south of France which sold it to a French-owned factory in Luxembourg which made it into frozen meals sold in supermarkets in 16 countries."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/horsemeat-found-in-british-supermarkets-may-be-donkey-8489030.html


Food regulation is an exclusive EU competence. And it is these regulations that have spectactularly failed. I stand by my statements.

The fact that this horsemeat came from Romania or Luxembourg is neither here nor there.


That is not a failure of the EU, the responsibility for food safety lies with suppliers, distributors and manufacturers. The EU has merely provided standardized regulation across the continent to ensure that all suppliers will be held to the same level of accountability.


The responsibility for breaking laws lies with those who break them, not those who make the laws.


It also makes ABSOLUTELY clear that the implementation of the strategy should be controlled by the competent NATIONAL authority. i.e. NOT the EU


Edited to add: I've since discovered the FSA actually lost control of this regulation when in 2010 the UK coalition government changed responsibility from the FSA for food composition to local authorities. The inability to check the composition of food lies entirely at the hands of UK government decisions NOT the EU.


You may not have noticed, because it doesn't fit in conveniently with your anti-European agenda, but we have our own problems with food safety within the UK. Stores in our very own Peckham have been revealed to be retailing highly questionable meats with very little attention to safety or provenance.


The EU regulations regarding proactive checking of EU food is simply there to make sure that countries deliver to the spirit of the open market; and don't create barriers to entry by creating false 'procedures' for imports.


EU food is still subject to exactly the same safety checks as UK food throughout the supply chain. The FSA can be as rigorous as they wish - so long as the same treatment is meted out to all foods without prejudice.


This is not trying to prevent spot checks on DNA (that never took place anyway), and the consistency of EU regulation ensures that overseas suppliers will be held to account as much as a UK supplier would be - something that could not have been done before the EU.


European arrest warrants also mean that miscreants can finally be chased across borders (something that could not be achieved without the EU).


So stop this silly partially informed Europe bashing - that it is based on national prejudice is clearly obvious by the way that you refuse to identify any of the parties without naming the country of origin. You clearly see their nationality as part of the crime.

"So stop this silly partially informed Europe bashing - that it is based on national prejudice is clearly obvious you refuse to identify any of the parties without naming the country of origin. You clearly see their nationality as part of the crime."


Er...that last paragraph was a direct quote from the Independent - see the link.


But nice, criticise EU regulations and you are automatically nationalistic and racist.


Stay classy, Huguenot. Stay classy.

Of course, the very fact I am criticising the EU means I should really turn myself in as the criminal I am.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1325398/Euro-court-outlaws-criticism-of-EU.html


Next time I finish my shift of scraping much-hated cyclists off the floor, dealing with gang activity and whatever else concerns the good citizens of our much-loved capital, I shall remove my stab vest and hand myself over to the other side of the desk.


"So stop this silly partially informed Europe bashing - that it is based on national prejudice is clearly obvious you refuse to identify any of the parties without naming the country of origin. You clearly see their nationality as part of the crime."


Clearly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...