Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know all that David, but having seen the mental rants on the blog before, I don't really trust what it says, and I still think they could just write this off as a bad experience and get on with it now.


I have no idea who would come out on top legally, I can't see why Celestial would lose a case. Fine, they may have had a moral duty (in some people's eyes) to let them sort it, but legally... Not sure. Of course, the lawyers will encourage them to go for it, as they'll get paid whatever.

I have spoken directly to the owners of G&B about this and they most certainly have not issued proceedings for any amount of money against anyone. In any event discussion of this nature is very unfair - both to Celestial, since it suggests they have done something wrong, and we have no proof of that, and to G&B, who are probably, as SimonM says, now in the hands of their insurer and so unable to comment one way or the other. Perhaps it would be better to just be pleased that two local independent businesses continue to exist, and hopefully to thrive, and hope that if they do have differences they can be resolved quickly.

What legalbeagle says.


Far more importantly, had a yummy and gossipy supper with a girlfriend at G&B on Wednesday which I enjoyed very much. BUT had a horrible surprise when the ice-cream billed as chocolate ice-cream turned out to be mint-flavoured chocolate ice-cream. Aaarghtthhhhha;lka;tiouasdvnae;tri. Not that I won't go back or anything, the place is a gem, but do you think I could sue for the shock?

This place certainly seems to cause quite a stir! The concept is brilliant, and the wine shop keeps Teaboy busy for hours-he loves it. I have just come back from a really disappointing lunch there. We waited ages for our food, which, when it turned up was dry, and not what we ordered. They are just not back into the swing of things since the closure. The staff (all new or junior) were apologetic, I just hope they start to become more consistent. I don't want to feel like it's a gamble to go there for lunch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "attack on the tax", I posted a link, how was that an attack? I didn't write the article, so how was that an attack on the proposed tax?  Are you now saying what can and cannot be posted, when did you become Admin(NOT). 
    • Your post was an attack on the tax   I didn’t  address or mention you in my reply. Just pointed  out the problems with the article you then told be I wasn’t invited.  In no way am I bullying anyone. The reverse is true if anything 
    • The problem is, I'm not sure what the going rate is for park land for festivals of this nature. I'm sure they are paying less than outfits pay for access to the big stadia - but these have better facilities and are normally better for public transport. I am also sure that Councils could press for more, and should do so, but of course there isn't really a shortage of council lands to exploit, so these entrepreneurs could go elsewhere. What I would like to know is how much of the suggested £440,000 this year for Southwark is net profit - what are their costs in getting and administering this let? If this is a gross figure then what do they actually have as 'surplus'? But at least we have a starting point now - even if it's a guess I'm thinking it's a reasonably informed one.
    • Looks like owner of Persepolis is opening something late summer in what was The dulwich Beer Dispensary spot…  Excited about that  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...