Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The thread was to see who had used McD's less than me, and about five of you rose to the challenge. The rest of you just wrote twadle. Start your own thread with "why I think McDonald's is not that bad, sort of, bro, kickin"


I last used Kentucky Fried Chicken in the early 80s but got some sort of MSG buzz. They changed the name to KFC as they stopped frying the chicken as it was too high in calolries.

Just an intersting point.

££££ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've had just as shit burgers for 8X the price in

> plenty of 'gastro pubs'....easy target, once in a

> while out of pure convenience i'll have one.



Not a soft target. Multi billion enterprise making money out of lowering the standard of a potentially fantastic product. Give me a gastro pub medium rare any time. Sorry your gastro pub experience in ED was bad Quidsir, but I have had some v nice gastro pub burgers on LL over the years. It feels as good as a top steak on a good day. McDs, you can't even taste the meat.

once for cup of tea on raining day when had missed train about twenty years ago, too a kids party about same time and maybe another kids party with one of my other sons at which had one of there dreadful apple pies since thought that would be safe bet was disgusting plastic. remember being at six form when Peckham one had just opened some friends worked there said they used to play football with the frozen burgers before they served them out front.

they are disgusting dirty places serving cheap chemically enhanced rubbish.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Start your own

> thread with "why I think McDonald's is not that

> bad, sort of, bro, kickin"


Or start your own forum, where the initiator of each thread has permission to censor the subsequent posts.

If you're complaining about the quality of the burgers, you're missing the point. You don't go there for a gourmet experience, there is no point comparing it with a ?10+ burger from a restaurant/gastropub. It's quick, cheap, hot food that you can eat on the go, and tastes OK-ish. If you don't want to eat their food then that's fine, but showing off about it is just snobbery.

A bit sighhhhh


Intention wasn't to debate the pros on cons of McD's but a competition on who had avoided it the most. Just light hearted stuff. Like my who reads the Daily Mail thread.


But now you raise the inverted snobbery gauntlet.


We are a progressively unhealthy nation.

The take away culture (not just McD's) is a serious contributor to this

Takeaways are not a major contributor to economic growth, skills and career prospects.

McDs and the like have enormous corporate clout/brand to influence whole generations

How does this support either our national identity (51st state?) or our celebration of diversity?

The Olympics sucked corporate cock, and as far as I can see did nothing to support SMEs as was promised.


Here comes another winter, of long shadows and high hopes

malumbu, you win, I've been to McD's many more times than you.


Moving on, I do indeed go for the extra hamburger, Otta. And despite always doing this, I will tack it on to the end of the order as if an afterthought (and not considered greed).


When my wife was away recently I resolved to try every burger (or sandwich) on the menu. Have to addmit that was taking it a little too far.

I had a Maccers cheeseburger the other night.


An aimiable drunk had just been telling me in detail about his shed and pressure washer - whilst I scoured the boards for the last train home. He shook my hand over-enthusiastically when we parted and said I was a 'good lad' - despite me being ten years older than him.


When I got home, I found tomato ketchup and onions around the crotch area of my trousers.



True story.

I don't know who it was - Relate, or similar organisation - once said that McDonalds are where a huge amount of chnage-overs take place. I think they even gave a percentage, something unfeasibly huge like 66%. It would be nice to find that stat on the web somewhere. I cannot think of many places, public or otherwise, that would be so well suited for such a potentially highly-charged moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...