Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The thread was to see who had used McD's less than me, and about five of you rose to the challenge. The rest of you just wrote twadle. Start your own thread with "why I think McDonald's is not that bad, sort of, bro, kickin"


I last used Kentucky Fried Chicken in the early 80s but got some sort of MSG buzz. They changed the name to KFC as they stopped frying the chicken as it was too high in calolries.

Just an intersting point.

££££ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've had just as shit burgers for 8X the price in

> plenty of 'gastro pubs'....easy target, once in a

> while out of pure convenience i'll have one.



Not a soft target. Multi billion enterprise making money out of lowering the standard of a potentially fantastic product. Give me a gastro pub medium rare any time. Sorry your gastro pub experience in ED was bad Quidsir, but I have had some v nice gastro pub burgers on LL over the years. It feels as good as a top steak on a good day. McDs, you can't even taste the meat.

once for cup of tea on raining day when had missed train about twenty years ago, too a kids party about same time and maybe another kids party with one of my other sons at which had one of there dreadful apple pies since thought that would be safe bet was disgusting plastic. remember being at six form when Peckham one had just opened some friends worked there said they used to play football with the frozen burgers before they served them out front.

they are disgusting dirty places serving cheap chemically enhanced rubbish.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Start your own

> thread with "why I think McDonald's is not that

> bad, sort of, bro, kickin"


Or start your own forum, where the initiator of each thread has permission to censor the subsequent posts.

If you're complaining about the quality of the burgers, you're missing the point. You don't go there for a gourmet experience, there is no point comparing it with a ?10+ burger from a restaurant/gastropub. It's quick, cheap, hot food that you can eat on the go, and tastes OK-ish. If you don't want to eat their food then that's fine, but showing off about it is just snobbery.

A bit sighhhhh


Intention wasn't to debate the pros on cons of McD's but a competition on who had avoided it the most. Just light hearted stuff. Like my who reads the Daily Mail thread.


But now you raise the inverted snobbery gauntlet.


We are a progressively unhealthy nation.

The take away culture (not just McD's) is a serious contributor to this

Takeaways are not a major contributor to economic growth, skills and career prospects.

McDs and the like have enormous corporate clout/brand to influence whole generations

How does this support either our national identity (51st state?) or our celebration of diversity?

The Olympics sucked corporate cock, and as far as I can see did nothing to support SMEs as was promised.


Here comes another winter, of long shadows and high hopes

malumbu, you win, I've been to McD's many more times than you.


Moving on, I do indeed go for the extra hamburger, Otta. And despite always doing this, I will tack it on to the end of the order as if an afterthought (and not considered greed).


When my wife was away recently I resolved to try every burger (or sandwich) on the menu. Have to addmit that was taking it a little too far.

I had a Maccers cheeseburger the other night.


An aimiable drunk had just been telling me in detail about his shed and pressure washer - whilst I scoured the boards for the last train home. He shook my hand over-enthusiastically when we parted and said I was a 'good lad' - despite me being ten years older than him.


When I got home, I found tomato ketchup and onions around the crotch area of my trousers.



True story.

I don't know who it was - Relate, or similar organisation - once said that McDonalds are where a huge amount of chnage-overs take place. I think they even gave a percentage, something unfeasibly huge like 66%. It would be nice to find that stat on the web somewhere. I cannot think of many places, public or otherwise, that would be so well suited for such a potentially highly-charged moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...