Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Winkworth are the best I've come across in the area. Many others are fine. I'd go with whichever one has similar properties on their books to what you've got to sell (they'll get you more viewings that way). If any of them have just sold something similar to what you have, that's usually a good bet as they will have disappointed clients waiting in the wings and will really have a good idea on pricing.


The only ones I'd say to avoid are Foxtons (their pricing is usually unrealistic and properties sit on their books for ages) and Haart (because I think they are rude and unpleasant to buyers).


In this market, any agent should be able to sell your property very quickly. The market is rediculously hot at the moment.

Twirly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are so many in the area, does anyone have

> any recommendations please? Experience? Advice?

> Particularly for the selling of flats.


Hi Twirly. Have you considered an on-line estate agent? My wife and I sold our flat last year with House Network due to lack of funds and extortionate quotes of commission and was over the moon with them. Commission worked out around 0.6% of flat value which saved us a fortune. There are loads of on-line companies out there but found out about House Network on Money Saving Expert. If you're interested this code gets you ann extra 5% off: EHAMYQKTNJ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...