Jump to content

Recommended Posts

JCoftheN Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To clarify I bought one pint of lager Moretti I

> believe , so nothing fancy



Moretti is one of the more expensive draft lagers (though ?6.50 does seem a bit steep, even for East Dulwich!)

You pays your money and take your choice. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/you-pays-your-money-and-you-takes-your-choice-chance


But if you are going to pay a premium one should have a good experience in both ambience and the quality of the service and product. The whole Youngs' (Ram) Estate is both pricey and generally disappointing, beer awful, not a patch on the days when it was still a local brewery. As for the 'Lane' the only place I used to drink in was the EDT, in the times of the EDC, and the CPT (RIP). The EDT now as an Antic pub is relatively decent for ambience and price. The Castle is the last unreconstructed pub, and whist not a usual Guinness drinker it seems right (and reasonable value) there.


A decade or two ago price marking order meant that by law pubs had to display their prices (as filling stations still have to do). This was not enforced and government revoked or amended the Statutory Instrument.


PS craft ale is Emperors' New Clothes and you have been hoodwinked into paying a premium. Alcopops aka fruit 'cider' anyone? Sol and a slice of lemon????

Agree on fruit ciders and hard seltzers which are mostly sugar and flavourings.


But craft ale/beer is a broad brush. The big boys have got in on the act and bought out quite a few breweries which waters down the product and inflates prices. Beavertown, Camden and Meantime are now available more but less quality. Craft brewers often use a lot more hops than the big boys.


I?d argue that some of our local breweries make some excellent beers with superior ingredients. Brick and Gypsy Hill have some crackers of different styles without being extortionate.


The difference between a Carlsberg, a Moretti and a Peckham Helles is similar to a Boris bike, a Pinnacle and a Pinarello. Each has their place but many won?t appreciate the difference

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Castle is the last

> unreconstructed pub, and whist not a usual

> Guinness drinker it seems right (and reasonable

> value) there.

>

I used to go in the Castle quite a bit but stopped because of the terrible smell from the toilets. Has that been fixed now?

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Castle is the last

> > unreconstructed pub, and whist not a usual

> > Guinness drinker it seems right (and reasonable

> > value) there.

> >

> I used to go in the Castle quite a bit but stopped

> because of the terrible smell from the toilets.

> Has that been fixed now?



Yes.


And it's a very friendly pub.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One of it's biggest selling points was the pool

> table, but they seemed to get rid, perhaps because

> of COVID? Does anyone know if it's coming back at

> some point?



It might have been after the changes of manager?


I never went in that side of the pub, so I don't know.

Pool table in the Castle is unlikely to come back, was the source of a lot of trouble apparently. Agree with other posts, it's a nice pub and if you go between 5 & 6 pm you can enjoy happy hour in which most prices are reduced, Guinness is ?3.50! back to ?4.50 afterwards, but still reasonable.

holloway Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pool table in the Castle is unlikely to come back,

> was the source of a lot of trouble apparently.


I read a criminological study 20 years ago that identifies that bars with pool tables have 60% more fights, and 60% of those fights statt within 2 feet of the pool table. (I'm making up the figures but that was the general idea). I think they're also quite expensive to fix.

ken78 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MrsR Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Try The Castle on Crystal Palace Rd or a little

> > further The Man of Kent on Nunhead Lane for

> > traditional pubs.

>

> and the price is ????


Man of Kent - ?4.50 for Guinness or a basic lager. I think they've completed stopped doing cask ales, though.


The Wetherspoons in Denmark Hill and Forest Hill are the cheapest pubs round here, also the Bird In Hand in Forest Hill is pretty cheap.

It's all about the gentrification of East Dulwich really. I met up with a friend in the Plough near Dulwich Library before the lock down and was flabbergasted to be charged double the price of a bottle of wine in the area for two glasses. When I had a joke with the bar attendant about the price he just turned away and served the next customer.

I saw that study too. I recall it also went on to assert that 100% of those fights involved individuals either already holding, or with ready access to a pool cue.



Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> holloway Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pool table in the Castle is unlikely to come

> back,

> > was the source of a lot of trouble apparently.

>

> I read a criminological study 20 years ago that

> identifies that bars with pool tables have 60%

> more fights, and 60% of those fights statt within

> 2 feet of the pool table. (I'm making up the

> figures but that was the general idea). I think

> they're also quite expensive to fix.

> The Wetherspoons in Denmark Hill and Forest Hill

> are the cheapest pubs round here, also the Bird In

> Hand in Forest Hill is pretty cheap.


Fox on the Hill had huge problems with service in summer - you couldn't get to the bar to be served and you couldn't get served through the app. People were leaving after 45 min waits. It was a shambles. The garden is nice but the owner is awful.


Alleyns Head is pretty reasonable and homely without being scabby. Dulwich Brewing Co never really hit ita stride somehow...

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fox on the Hill had huge problems with service in

> summer - you couldn't get to the bar to be served

> and you couldn't get served through the app.

> People were leaving after 45 min waits. It was a

> shambles. The garden is nice but the owner is

> awful.


Yeah. It's a bit shambolic at the best of times. But there were a few days/weeks post-lockdown where the garden and the tables out front were absolutely rammed and they were just way out of their depth.


I kind of like it though. Easy to slag off spoons and their awful owner, but a cheap pub with bags of outdoor space and good beer selection... I like having it there.

I'm meeting up with a friend at the Fox this week and looking forward to it. Will be interesting to see what they have on offer food-wise as the last time the only thing they had when we ordered was scampi and chips or salad. Everything else on the menu was off the card.


Just hope they can live up to things as the Fox on the Hill holds a special place in my heart.

Pubs in East Dulwich, as well as being boring, are generally a massive rip off. They know that well off, affluent families with cash to burn like to visit them with the 4 children and nanny in tow, and don't think twice spending over ?100 on a simple dinner. The ?6.50 pint of Moretti wont look so out of place next to a ?18 plate of burger and chips, so the pubs is happy to charge this. The Palmerston doesn't want people popping in for a pint, they want to fleece the families which to be fair deserve a good fleecing of their inherited money.


A notable exception to this is The Castle. They were still charging ?4.50 for a pint of Moretti post 1st lockdown, so a whole ?2 cheaper than The Palmerston. You wont be able to dine on seabass at The Castle, because it is a proper pub rather than an expensive restaurant with a bar, so do bear that in mind.


The EDT would be the next cheapest. Antic actually charge quite high prices here compared to their other pubs, because even a car crash of a company that goes bust every few years and has a whole portfolio of pubs stolen under their nose, realises that there are lots of wealthy folk in ED that wont even flinch at paying over the odds.


If you want fairly priced affordable pubs, go to Nunhead or Forest Hill. Nunhead has The Man of Kent, Pyrotechnists Arms and Skehans which are decent pubs with pints around the ?4 mark. Forest Hill has The Bird in Hand where a pint of lager (Carlsberg) can be as cheap as ?2.60 or an ale ?2.10, and no drink even close to a fiver. The Hill, a couple of doors up, is just as cheap if not cheaper. Then there is the Capitol Wetherspoons of course.


Most people from East Dulwich will be scared of the above pubs however, as they are normally filled with working class people who are drinking beer, not observing the Creme Fraiche and asking the waitress if they stock alcohol free Kombucha. But if you dont like getting completely ripped off and appreciate pubs for being, well, pubs then do seek out the above options.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fox on the Hill had huge problems with service

> in

> > summer - you couldn't get to the bar to be

> served

> > and you couldn't get served through the app.

> > People were leaving after 45 min waits. It was

> a

> > shambles. The garden is nice but the owner is

> > awful.

>

> Yeah. It's a bit shambolic at the best of times.

> But there were a few days/weeks post-lockdown

> where the garden and the tables out front were

> absolutely rammed and they were just way out of

> their depth.

>

> I kind of like it though. Easy to slag off spoons

> and their awful owner, but a cheap pub with bags

> of outdoor space and good beer selection... I like

> having it there.


I thought it was great in the summer when they were absolutely all over the shop, as you could bring your own booze and sit on the benches, pour it into a glass and chuck the empty cans and bottles on the floor. Or simply bring bottles of a beer they stocked and a bottle opener. The staff were far too busy to notice it going on ( plus they didnt have bouncers) and you didn't have to wait for ages for a drink. If you use your initiative in these scenarios, you can prevent yourself getting mugged off.

Cycled past the Rye Hotel today, now called something else, and looked in the window. They are happily advertising 'craft beer' whatever that may be at ?6.50 a pint. Obviously something the punters want.


I recall going to the Rake in Borough market a few years ago and the fizzy beer exceeded that even then, but they had some more subtle stuff and not far off normal pub prices, so credit to them for that.


Have an on off relationship with the Fox, sometimes beer selection is great, other times not. Similar with the clietele and service.

The Fox and even the one in Forest Hill have fairly okay punters (except when I am in), but the Spoons opposite Sainsbury's at the top of Gipsy Hill is a classic Spoons hellhole.


The price of my objection to the owner's politics is speedy service and low cost. If they can't do that, my principals surface again!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...