Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast majority of residents? but the vast majority of respondents. Two very different things, yet some struggle to tell the difference.


Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other Labour

> Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported pushing

> through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by the

> vast majority of residents, yet the attitude of

> one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk since

> the start and now to pass the buck is a typical

> politicians response when they're in power.

Good idea - unfortunately it?s got the stage where no matter what a councillor says some will twist it and interpret it in a way to suit their agenda. Cllr Leeming was helpfully informing people of the Thames Water works, he?s right it probably will be quicker to walk or cycle if you can possibly avoid driving. That?s true of most travel in London.



jazzer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps bring this back to the topic, rather than

> go of at various unconnected tangent's.

>

> If you want to talk about cllrs/MP, how about

> starting a separate thread.

march46 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast

> majority of residents? but the vast majority of

> respondents. Two very different things, yet some

> struggle to tell the difference.

>

> Bic Basher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> Labour

> > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported pushing

> > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by

> the

> > vast majority of residents, yet the attitude of

> > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> since

> > the start and now to pass the buck is a typical

> > politicians response when they're in power.


It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.

march46 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good idea - unfortunately it?s got the stage where

> no matter what a councillor says some will twist

> it and interpret it in a way to suit their agenda.

> Cllr Leeming was helpfully informing people of the

> Thames Water works, he?s right it probably will be

> quicker to walk or cycle if you can possibly avoid

> driving. That?s true of most travel in London.

>

>

> jazzer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perhaps bring this back to the topic, rather

> than

> > go of at various unconnected tangent's.

> >

> > If you want to talk about cllrs/MP, how about

> > starting a separate thread.



To be fair I think a lot of people take offence to his tone and his, sometimes, pointed and demeaning tweets.


I am not sure what value adding the comment below brings to his thread, other than trying to have a dig:


Remember, this is the responsibility of Thames Water not the council


Either that or he is really worried about losing his seat and feels the need to spell it out to people! Pretty sure most people realize the water main has nothing to do with the council!

These threads can get abit personal at times??

Every now & again I take a peak but can?t be asked comment 🤨


London is a city for gods sake??. You will never get country roads/lanes down here!

All these LTN?s are helping nobody other than the councils/government fill their pockets!

If you mistakenly think for a second the government care about you, then I suggest you think again!


LTN supporters can support them all day long, all these past, present & future charges they are talking about are affecting the consumer?? the bottom line is everything is about clawing money from us for whatever they wish to use it for, we will always be worse off no matter how climate friendly you are!


Yes I know my post isn?t about the south circular, I?m sorry, but I just wanted to say something

Btw, I?m a driver & drive for a living but do not own a car simply because I don?t need one.

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> march46 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast

> > majority of residents? but the vast majority of

> > respondents. Two very different things, yet

> some

> > struggle to tell the difference.

> >

> > Bic Basher Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> > Labour

> > > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported

> pushing

> > > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by

> > the

> > > vast majority of residents, yet the attitude

> of

> > > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> > since

> > > the start and now to pass the buck is a

> typical

> > > politicians response when they're in power.

>

> It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.


Interesting that you identified someone as pro-LDN because they had their facts straight. 🤔

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bic Basher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > march46 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the

> vast

> > > majority of residents? but the vast majority

> of

> > > respondents. Two very different things, yet

> > some

> > > struggle to tell the difference.

> > >

> > > Bic Basher Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> > > Labour

> > > > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported

> > pushing

> > > > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported

> by

> > > the

> > > > vast majority of residents, yet the

> attitude

> > of

> > > > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> > > since

> > > > the start and now to pass the buck is a

> > typical

> > > > politicians response when they're in power.

> >

> > It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.

>

> Interesting that you identified someone as pro-LDN

> because they had their facts straight. 🤔



Another LTN troll.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...