Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"The heir apparent" ha ha, apparent[ly] not!


Why should it matter who he stood against, if he has political convictions not served by his brother's then why the hell shouldn't he? Specious argument.


Sporting metaphors are lazy metaphors and I'm afraid your interpretation reflcts none of the craft but stands merely as an inference.


For instance to me it's too close to to a music metaphor (ie being heard to strike the right note, clssic nu labour) and "if there's grass on the pitch...", for that reason alone probably best avoided.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sporting metaphors are lazy metaphors


I have to confess that I did enjoy Boris's line after Eddie Mair asked him if he'd like to be prime minister: "If that ball came loose from the back of the scrum.."

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is the quality of a metaphor defined by what was

> implied or what was inferred? Is it degraded as an

> artform if the audience is unfamiliar with

> context?


I would suggest that the quality of a metaphor lies in what it communicates. It should aid comprehension, evoking more than the mere literal would have. I would therefore suggest that this metaphor failed.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> El Pibe Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sporting metaphors are lazy metaphors

>

> I have to confess that I did enjoy Boris's line

> after Eddie Mair asked him if he'd like to be

> prime minister: "If that ball came loose from the

> back of the scrum.."


Boris is a cunt, but he's a wizard with words.

I read some political commentator, not the Prince of Denmark, who said actually Ed is the brighter. Given that David got into Oxford with crap A levels on a place for 'disadvantaged' inner city comprehensive pupils*


*inner city kids who have the public school educated Benns and Foots et al popping round to their parents million pound house in Primrose Hill to discuss inequality obviously

Ed may be brighter but the problems remain the same with or without brother David in the background. Ed is no effective opposition.


I do think we've lost sight of who make good political leaders. We've been fed fresh faced media friendly (and not always particularly bright) inexperienced and privilieged wannabees by all the parties. Where are the people with great experience of politics, driven by clear plans for social and/ or economic change based on years of useful experience in anything relevant? Ed for me has the same problem as Cameron and Clegg. He is too young and knows too little.

Since Labour lost to Mrs T, after the shenanigans surrounding mebership of Militant, I have been very suspicious of them -since anyone with aspirations to Government would, of necessity, cloak their extreme Left wing views (ok so you can accuse me of believing that they are Commies in disguise if you like- because I do anyway).

Also, worryingly, someone I know who was a trade union rep. was offered a position on a regional association because they 'talked the talk'. The person in question had never had to prove themselves as being an effective rep. in 2 years as no opportunities had arisen in that time.

I agree with EP- a leader needs to be a ruthless b...- it's what they do- not what they say. So far they are all a bunch of toothless wonders imho.

  • 5 months later...

Labour and I departed on bad terms some time ago and since Blair I have struggled to entertain anything they say, the lack of substance and abandonment of the past reinforce insincerity for me. We are in a political vacuum of sorts. Both main parties have had significant terms in office post 1979 and have between them have successfully managed to run our post industrial economy into the ground. Post 2010 the liberal party has joined them and also managed to put their tuppence worth in to further deconstruct and damage our economy. Where do we go next? There is nowhere that's the truth Hence why the polls are in a dead heat near enough and coalitions of any colours are as good as it gets for us on the trust scale. Sad but true. Anyway who is this Ed you all talk of?


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...