Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bean_and_legumes Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i request more questions like "Donald Duck never

> wears trousers. but always wraps a towel round his

> waist after bathing - why?"

> and less well known, mathematically and logically

> solvable problems like the three doors probability

> pooper..


I thought I was getting into the spirit of things, Beans.

After all, you did start us off with a biology O-level yawner classic.

Alas, I did GCSEs too.

But a teacher began one of our lessons by writing said oyster/shell conundrum on the blackboard. I think it was a way of gettin dahn wit da kidz. "Hey - science can be fun!"


I could only assume it must have been in his biology o-level paper, circa 1935.

Honestly, you really, really must switch. Chav gets close to the mark though. If the host knows which door has the car behind it - switch. If he opens doors randomly - it makes no difference what you do. The problem can be simplified if you increase the number of doors. Say to 100. Choose a door. The host then opens 98 other doors all revealing goats leaving one other door and your original door. The chances of you having picked the door with the car the first time round are very small so of course you would then switch.


If you want the long and frankly overly complicated answer, Wikipedia (as always) is on hand.


On a lighter note, why do many hands make light work and yet too many cooks spoil the broth?

Why does a series of Zs indicate that someone is asleep? Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Is it some kind of onomatopoeia? I have never heard a sleeping person make a sound that sounds like Zzzzzzzzzzz.


And is it peculiar to English or does Zzzzzzzzzzz mean that someone is asleep in Portuguese, French or Swahili too?

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If toast always lands butter-side down, and cats

> always land on their feet, what happens if you

> strap toast on the back of a cat and drop it?


I think you have just solved the world?s energy crisis by inventing a perpetual motion machine.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If toast always lands butter-side down, and cats

> always land on their feet, what happens if you

> strap toast on the back of a cat and drop it?


I get all my scientific knowledge from fiction - so forgive me if ths is wrong.... but according to Jonathan Safran Foer in his book Extrememly Loud and Incredibly Close - if you drop a cat from say the second floor, they will die.... but drop them from say the top of a tower block - say eighteen floors - and they will have time to relax, and arch their bodies, effectively creating a parachute effect, so they will land on their feet.

There's even an illustration in the book to demonstrate this.


So if the bread is fresh and has the ability to bend, it will survive; toast or a bagel I believe would hinder the cat's ability to arch its back ... meaning death for both.

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan, a semi-detached (ie in physical contact

> with another home on only one side) home on the

> coast I would imagine. Not nearly as mysterious as

> the other questions on here if you don't mind me

> saying so.


So that song's about a house then.

What song?


Oh dear, have I just been spectacularly naive and/or completely missed the point?

There is only one other interpretation I can think of - "a semi" is also what a man has when half way from flaccid to erect. Given the correct stimulation, that could happen anywhere including by the sea!


Edited, because falccid is not, in fact, a real word!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...