Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh Seany, Seany, Seany....when (if) I do come to an EDF drinks I will by you a big foamy pint and give you a friendly, hetro mankiss on the cheek....as I like you, I really do. ...have I wound you up that much? My comments about censorship were aimed at Moos(and we sorted our argument, by agreeing to differ, amicably) and then Pongo who was acrtually rude to me (go and read it again) not you fella, you're a touch paranoid sometimes methinks. My failure to respond to your private male was/is my inability to master the interwebby thing and nothing personal...honest. XXX Quids

* i appear to have come over all faint *


in fact (with all due credit to dulwich mum )


* swoon *


when i get my hands on a proper keyboard i might reply to that one properly. But for now i live in hope you join brendan and me on wed night inside 72

anyway - now that I'm over the shock do I start with the positives or the negatives?


Cheers for the response quids - I had an idea during yesterday's dialogue with others that you weren't quite the wilting violet some of your defenders had you down as. Now that the curtain has slipped tho, don't over-compensate by being over-aggressive in other threads y'hear? ;-)


Glad you and Moos were happy with the resolution to your discussion - I'm less glad that unsubstantiated claims about censorship, bullying and Stepford-esque attitudes remain flung and unaddressed (not just you btw)

Getting back to the original point - sorry to hear you're off, Ultraconsultancy, and wish you luck for the future.


Um - I believe you have copies of my books (delivered to you pre-Xmas) tho don't know if you sold any. Can you let me know how you want to go about returning them? Please PM me to let me know ...

It's not rational to assume all small businesses will succeed (they don't, by a vast majority).

This is a problem with so many aspirational small business owners/investors.

What is rational is to make judgements informed by various conditions affecting the operating environment.

The judgement may not support the aspiration (i.e. success) and if it does not, some serious decisions have to be made.

A judgement predicting a failure is not a negative judgement, though the failure itself can be regarded as negative (assuming the business was started for profit reasons).

Also the person making the judgement is not necessarily BEING negative.


I haven't read ????'s other stuff or all the comments on here but his basic point was fair.

Debi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Um - I believe you have copies of my books

> (delivered to you pre-Xmas) tho don't know if you

> sold any. Can you let me know how you want to

> go about returning them? Please PM me to let me

> know ...


Oooh I bought a couple - assuming Debi is not a really common first name amongst East Dulwich writers - one of each in fact.

DC - oh bless! Assuming we're talking about Nirvana Bites and Trading Tatiana ... Hope you enjoyed them and really pleased you had access to them via UC's stall.


And yes, I am Debi Alper. As you can see, I'm crap at self-promotion! (One of the reasons I don't include a link to my website and blog on this forum.)

Seen this really late as I haven't even looked at the main area of the forum for ages. Anyway, UC, Best of luck to you, if you ever open that guitar shop, let me know when you get that rare SG in for me! ;-)


RE: Quids (a really annoying name for ????), I agree with Asset, I don't think he's overly negative, I find his posts funny. I also don't think he was being nasty on this thread, he made it clear that his predictions are regrettable, but he was being realistic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...