Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Much more efficient than an open fire. Less heat escapes up the chimney (70% plus in an open fire compared to less than 20% in a wood burner) and they use less fuel to creat more heat. Less risk of fire damage I suppose and if you can connect yours to a back-boiler you can use it to heat water and other areas of the house.


You can even use it to generate electricity to sell back to the national grid.

They're a great deal more efficient than an open fireplace, last longer on less and give off more heat.

If you don't like the look of traditional wood stoves there are some pretty funky designs around these days.


I agree you can't really beat a proper open fire , but as we've built an airtight house that isn't an option, even the stoves need to be sealed and supplied from an external pipe. we went with a couple that were vaguely similar to this, though can't remember the brand



here are some funky ones

http://www.stovesonline.co.uk/wood_burning_stoves/Contemporary-Designer-stoves.html

THis site is excellent

http://www.whatstove.co.uk/stove-reviews/stoves/stove-reviews/_c35/

It depends what you want / need it for.


Additional heating for occasional cosy nights in with Ant & Dec and a box of Guylian - the romance of an open fire might be the one for you. Not a legal romance though: you're meant to use smokeless fuel on an open fire, which is about as romantic as a Pot Noodle. That said, one sniff of local air on an autumn night will tell you that many are in flagrant (boom! boom!) breach of the law.


Anything else in terms of practicality, heat etc = stove. They still look nice.. especially if you find the right moulding / surround.

"Officially" you should have a DEFFRA compliant stove IF you want to burn wood.


Smokeless coal and other smokeless products are fine on an open fire - but not so efficient.( see clean air act 1971)


The wood burning stove radiates more heat into the room, hence it's more efficient to run. Though it's not a cheap option, you can take the stove out and take it with you when you leave.


Design wise, there's a dearth of naff/cutesy Mrs Hedgehog style logburners to wade through, but with a little patience you'll find a neat modern one to suit your look. Make sure you opt for the multi fuel model, it's more flexible fuel wise. Wood combined with a little smokeless coal is optimum.



I'm fond of the Danish made Westfire. It's got a nice deep firebox, performs very well and looks good, with a neat flat top plate that you can put a pan on to slow cook with.


Lastly, its cleaner & very enjoyable.


We've enjoyed many a good "hot-yoga" session in front of one.

agree with Bob, what do you want to use it for. For occasional and picturesque use, an open fire is very nice. There are some good gas imitation ones too that can go in the fireplace cavity.


We have our original fireplace in our sitting room where we occasionally have smokeless coal fires. We used to use it much more, until we installed a woodburning stove in our kitchen diner.


Our wood burning stove is on a lot, all day when I am working from home and I don't use any central heating at the same time. It takes the edge off the rest of the downstairs too while keeping the back of the house toasty.

Ours can take a bit of smokeless coal too, to keep it going, but wood is what it is mainly meant to burn.


Then there is storage of wood- you are not going to get far on nets of logs from garages! Bulk buying is the key and you need a place in your garden to store it where it can be both aired and kept dry. So that is a consideration. I made mine out of a pallet and a brolly in the back of the garden and that does the job. .


We chose an ecologically efficient heavy steel stove which heats up very quickly and burns effectively. It was quite expensive but highly recommended by friends -Clearview. But we considered closely many others, including the very popular Morso Squirrel.


It looks very attractive as it sits deep inside the fireplace cavity. If you wanted to preserve an original fireplace there are smaller ones out there, or you could sit it in front of the fireplace and connect it from the back rather than the top.


A really good site for helping you decide is http://www.whatstove.co.uk/ chock-full of users reviewers.


We really wanted a wood burner for our needs, and I think it would have been an expensive choice if we weren't going to use it much.

You would need your chimney cleaned and tested, and probably lined. If it doesnt need lining, lining is probably advised. There are loads of fitters recommended on here through CASA in Bellenden Road, or independently. I ordered my stove independently and used Dennis to fit it 07903425482. The fitting will cost you as much or more than your stove but is essential for safety and efficiency.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I dunno... I just find it a bit daft that people

> want to shove wood (or smokeless fuel) into a

> fireplace to keep warm.

>

> It's perfectly possible to get a victorian style

> fire surround (reclaimed or repro) with a gas

> burner in it. Seems much more practical to me.


We use around ?150 worth of smokeless coal a year on a few open fires. It's nice to look at, means we don't use the central heating so much because we only really use the living room; excellent when I'm working from home as I can just heat up the study. I've worked out that we save around ?150 on gas bills because of this.


Downsides: have to clear it out, go outside to fill up the coal bin, useless most evenings during the week as it takes a few hours to warm up (ditto if you go out).


If I was going to live in my current place more than 5 years I would install a stove...

we'll use wood, but that's not really an issue in rural ireland, we'll heat the house as much as possible with water heated using solar thermal which, thankfully considering where it is, works very efficiently through cloud!!





The house is airtight and ludicrously well insulated so we're hoping that the woodburners will provide plenty of heat and make us less dependent on gas. We've an 9 8kw one in the main open plan living/dining/kitchen (where the oven should provide heat too) area and a 7 5.5kw one in the sitting room.


Maintenance will be a pain, especially with two.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why not just put one of these into the fireplace

> and have done with it?

>

> http://www-4.plumbworld.co.uk/single-panel-single-

> convector-600mm-00022949M.jpg



*bob* you are priceless. Burst out laughing at that on the train!

What what I understood, the 'smoke-free approved' thing is a bit confusing, or it was when we got ours.


Each individual stove had to 'pass' - but the process takes a while and has a cost. As a consequence, there were loads of stoves that used the same cleaningburning tech, but some had been through the test and others hadn't.


So we got one - A Morso Badger - when it wasn't approved. But we knew it would be approved at some point as it was just a smaller version of the Owl, which had been approved.


So worth checking if others in the range have been 'done'..

The "approval thing" is about how efficient it burns the wood ie: calorific exchange, so many existing appliances would technically pass when their top flue is set is at about 3/4 and the heat isn't rushing up the flue.


However, some manufactures have now passed the test and a device to restrict their flue is fitted. (often a simple screw restricting the full range on the top vent/flue lever)


Ironically, the fire often draws/works better when the simple device (the screw) is removed once installation is complete.

  • 4 weeks later...

we just used RPS fireplaces to fit a stove we bought direct on-line. Was miles cheaper than the shop quotes who all insisted on lining our chimney - an unnecessary job which added ?1k to the cost! We used Paul Silver 07939236261 and he and his partner worked really hard all day to give a good result. Nice guys - got their details via this forum in the first place. Also used their recommended sweep Steve Pearce

07930345245.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...