Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am sorry to say, but it appears that the standard of education on this site is going down hill rapidly.

We have people who represent us as elected members who are unable to spell or use a spell check before posting.


Can forgive grammar but spelling even as a dyslexic is unforgivable.


Can we at least get a proper standard of education on here?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/
Share on other sites

grumpyoldman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am sorry to say, but it appears that the

> standard of education on this site is going down

> hill rapidly.

> We have people who represent us as elected members

> who are unable to spell or use a spell check

> before posting.

>

> Can forgive grammar but spelling even as a

> dyslexic is unforgivable.

>

> Can we at least get a proper standard of education

> on here?


xxxxxxx


WTF?


You are indeed living up to your forum name.


If somebody can communicate reasonably effectively, what does it matter whether their spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards or not?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-632412
Share on other sites

Are you for real? One minute trawling your postings throws up these gems:


"Ok freedom of speach etc have a go"


"can we not also put road blocks into Underhill Road, Dunstans Road etc which would eleviate the issues"


"bring back horses and carriges"


What let you down there? Was it your inability to spell or your inability to use spell check before posting?


Don't get me started on your crimes against apostrophes and question marks, as you don't have a grasp on either.


Frankly I don't care whether someone's written English is 100% spot on; I'm more interested in what they say.


God knows how many people lurk on here without posting because they're worried that if they express themselves "inaccurately" some spelling troll will make them wish they hadn't bothered.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-632535
Share on other sites

Sue --


"If somebody can communicate reasonably effectively, what does it matter whether their spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards or not?"


-- surely


"If somebody can communicate reasonably effectively, what does it matter whether his or her spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards or not?"


**grin**

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-632959
Share on other sites

Yes this is my view.


? Someone might touch, move and inspire, or even entertain, without winning any medals for their English.?


If you can hold the attention of members long enough to read the whole message, and hopefully get a good response, I think that readers of my posts would forgive any lapse of spelling or grammar that I might make.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633025
Share on other sites

Cun you like take me seriskly m8 If i right lik this?


The odd typo especially on a touch screen Lumia like mine (cost a lot of money! :-) ) ! is easily done and can be forgiven. A constant stream of random texts and numbers that is almost meaningless is something to be ashamed of.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633035
Share on other sites

Alex K Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue --

>

> "If somebody can communicate reasonably

> effectively, what does it matter whether their

> spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards

> or not?"

>

> -- surely



>

> "If somebody can communicate reasonably

> effectively, what does it matter whether his or

> her spelling and grammar meet your stringent

> standards or not?"

>

> **grin**



Using them/their is certainly preferable to the current american habit of using a default she instead of he. It's political correctness gone mad etc etc.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633037
Share on other sites

Interesting one Alex K / nashoi :)


'They' to denote a singular individual of indeterminate gender has been in use for at least 500 years.


I continually catch myself on it because I'm unsure whether I'll be understood. So sometimes it's s/he and sometimes just 'they'.


Good quote from Shakey: Arise; one knocks. / ... / Hark, how they knock! ? Romeo and Juliet


Popular usage would signify it's acceptable, and I'd we can accept 'thou' (singular) being replaced by 'you' (plural) then we'd have to accept 'their' referring to the possessions of an individual of indeterminate gender.


So I think Sue clears it on that one!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633108
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting one Alex K / nashoi :)

>

> 'They' to denote a singular individual of

> indeterminate gender has been in use for at least

> 500 years.

>

> I continually catch myself on it because I'm

> unsure whether I'll be understood. So sometimes

> it's s/he and sometimes just 'they'.

>

> Good quote from Shakey: Arise; one knocks. / ... /

> Hark, how they knock! ? Romeo and Juliet

>

> Popular usage would signify it's acceptable, and

> I'd we can accept 'thou' (singular) being replaced

> by 'you' (plural) then we'd have to accept 'their'

> referring to the possessions of an individual of

> indeterminate gender.

>

> So I think Sue clears it on that one!


xxxxx


I think "their" is far less clumsy than "his or her" in the sentence I used - but really, does it matter?


I assume that everybody knew what I meant :)


Which was exactly the point I was making ...... :)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633132
Share on other sites

Alex K Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue --

>

> "If somebody can communicate reasonably

> effectively, what does it matter whether their

> spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards

> or not?"

>

> -- surely

>

> "If somebody can communicate reasonably

> effectively, what does it matter whether his or

> her spelling and grammar meet your stringent

> standards or not?"

>

> **grin**



Hmmm..... I'm afraid you will have to wipe that grin from your face :( The use of 'their' in that context is perfectly acceptable.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633134
Share on other sites

People who were poor at spelling:-


Alfred Mosher Butts -- Creator of Scrabble Game


John Keats.


Jane Austen.


Albert Einstein


Winston Churchill


Leonardo Da Vinci


Agatha Christie


John F. Kennedy Jr.


Benjamin Franklin.


People with something more important to say may well be more

concerned about content than spelling.


Poor spelling could well be a sign of Genius.


Perhaps some people here should be more concerned with content and worry less about spelling.


Especially criticizing other peoples spelling


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633146
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
    • Nothing to do with the topic of this thread, but I have to say, I think it is quite untrue that people don't make human contact in cities. Just locally, there are street parties, road WhatsApp groups, one street I know near here hires a coach and everyone in the street goes to the seaside every year! There are lots of neighbourhood groups on Facebook, where people look out for each other and help each other. In my experience people chat to strangers on public transport, in shops, waiting in queues etc. To the best of my knowledge the forum does not need donations to keep it going. It contains paid ads, which hopefully helps Joe,  the very excellent admin,  to keep it up and running. And as for a house being broken into, that could happen anywhere. I knew a village in Devon where a whole row of houses was burgled one night in the eighties. Sorry to continue the off topic conversation when the poor OP was just trying to find out who was open for lunch on Christmas Day!
    • We went to Chern Thai for lunch on Saturday, as we have done quite often, and they were closed, with no sign of life. The sign in the window still says Saturday 12-3, and there was no indication that they would be closed. Can anybody shed any light? We went to Chilli and Garlic on Zenoria Street instead. Their falafel salad bowl is amazing (and amazing value!) but we had been looking forward to a Pad Thai and a pint of Singha! ETA: I am reviving this thread because it is/was  specifically about Chern Thai's opening times! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...