Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am sorry to say, but it appears that the standard of education on this site is going down hill rapidly.

We have people who represent us as elected members who are unable to spell or use a spell check before posting.


Can forgive grammar but spelling even as a dyslexic is unforgivable.


Can we at least get a proper standard of education on here?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/
Share on other sites

grumpyoldman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am sorry to say, but it appears that the

> standard of education on this site is going down

> hill rapidly.

> We have people who represent us as elected members

> who are unable to spell or use a spell check

> before posting.

>

> Can forgive grammar but spelling even as a

> dyslexic is unforgivable.

>

> Can we at least get a proper standard of education

> on here?


xxxxxxx


WTF?


You are indeed living up to your forum name.


If somebody can communicate reasonably effectively, what does it matter whether their spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards or not?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-632412
Share on other sites

Are you for real? One minute trawling your postings throws up these gems:


"Ok freedom of speach etc have a go"


"can we not also put road blocks into Underhill Road, Dunstans Road etc which would eleviate the issues"


"bring back horses and carriges"


What let you down there? Was it your inability to spell or your inability to use spell check before posting?


Don't get me started on your crimes against apostrophes and question marks, as you don't have a grasp on either.


Frankly I don't care whether someone's written English is 100% spot on; I'm more interested in what they say.


God knows how many people lurk on here without posting because they're worried that if they express themselves "inaccurately" some spelling troll will make them wish they hadn't bothered.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-632535
Share on other sites

Sue --


"If somebody can communicate reasonably effectively, what does it matter whether their spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards or not?"


-- surely


"If somebody can communicate reasonably effectively, what does it matter whether his or her spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards or not?"


**grin**

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-632959
Share on other sites

Yes this is my view.


? Someone might touch, move and inspire, or even entertain, without winning any medals for their English.?


If you can hold the attention of members long enough to read the whole message, and hopefully get a good response, I think that readers of my posts would forgive any lapse of spelling or grammar that I might make.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633025
Share on other sites

Cun you like take me seriskly m8 If i right lik this?


The odd typo especially on a touch screen Lumia like mine (cost a lot of money! :-) ) ! is easily done and can be forgiven. A constant stream of random texts and numbers that is almost meaningless is something to be ashamed of.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633035
Share on other sites

Alex K Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue --

>

> "If somebody can communicate reasonably

> effectively, what does it matter whether their

> spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards

> or not?"

>

> -- surely



>

> "If somebody can communicate reasonably

> effectively, what does it matter whether his or

> her spelling and grammar meet your stringent

> standards or not?"

>

> **grin**



Using them/their is certainly preferable to the current american habit of using a default she instead of he. It's political correctness gone mad etc etc.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633037
Share on other sites

Interesting one Alex K / nashoi :)


'They' to denote a singular individual of indeterminate gender has been in use for at least 500 years.


I continually catch myself on it because I'm unsure whether I'll be understood. So sometimes it's s/he and sometimes just 'they'.


Good quote from Shakey: Arise; one knocks. / ... / Hark, how they knock! ? Romeo and Juliet


Popular usage would signify it's acceptable, and I'd we can accept 'thou' (singular) being replaced by 'you' (plural) then we'd have to accept 'their' referring to the possessions of an individual of indeterminate gender.


So I think Sue clears it on that one!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633108
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting one Alex K / nashoi :)

>

> 'They' to denote a singular individual of

> indeterminate gender has been in use for at least

> 500 years.

>

> I continually catch myself on it because I'm

> unsure whether I'll be understood. So sometimes

> it's s/he and sometimes just 'they'.

>

> Good quote from Shakey: Arise; one knocks. / ... /

> Hark, how they knock! ? Romeo and Juliet

>

> Popular usage would signify it's acceptable, and

> I'd we can accept 'thou' (singular) being replaced

> by 'you' (plural) then we'd have to accept 'their'

> referring to the possessions of an individual of

> indeterminate gender.

>

> So I think Sue clears it on that one!


xxxxx


I think "their" is far less clumsy than "his or her" in the sentence I used - but really, does it matter?


I assume that everybody knew what I meant :)


Which was exactly the point I was making ...... :)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633132
Share on other sites

Alex K Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue --

>

> "If somebody can communicate reasonably

> effectively, what does it matter whether their

> spelling and grammar meet your stringent standards

> or not?"

>

> -- surely

>

> "If somebody can communicate reasonably

> effectively, what does it matter whether his or

> her spelling and grammar meet your stringent

> standards or not?"

>

> **grin**



Hmmm..... I'm afraid you will have to wipe that grin from your face :( The use of 'their' in that context is perfectly acceptable.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633134
Share on other sites

People who were poor at spelling:-


Alfred Mosher Butts -- Creator of Scrabble Game


John Keats.


Jane Austen.


Albert Einstein


Winston Churchill


Leonardo Da Vinci


Agatha Christie


John F. Kennedy Jr.


Benjamin Franklin.


People with something more important to say may well be more

concerned about content than spelling.


Poor spelling could well be a sign of Genius.


Perhaps some people here should be more concerned with content and worry less about spelling.


Especially criticizing other peoples spelling


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30950-spelling/#findComment-633146
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...