Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I forgot my phone or would have posted a picture. Junction of Barry Rd next to pedestrian crossing and entrance to Peckham Rye Park.


A jumble/ heap of around 20 Urban Forest hire bikes strewn around the pavement. Unsightly, a hazard and just plain wrong.

 

Just passed by and they’ve all gone …

Good. I pass that way regularly so it will be interesting to see what happens next.


On my own street this morning, a locked ( to a post) bike lying on its side, partly blocking the pavement. Perhaps it has been kicked over deliberately, but it is chained to something.

It could be worse..


https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2018/03/bike-share-oversupply-in-china-huge-piles-of-abandoned-and-broken-bicycles/556268/


Interesting Guardian article with some of the background here.


https://amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2022/jul/28/bicycle-graveyards-why-do-so-many-bikes-end-up-underwater


Which led me to these which I thought was interesting, about the failed mobike roll out in Manchester, and their subsequent decision to go with something more integrated with public transport and not allowing loads of bikes randomly dumped about the place (ie docking stations required)


https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/what-fate-mobike-can-teach-20582240?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target


Although still some nervousness about the potential for vandalism


https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/nov/10/andy-burnham-dont-throw-manchester-hire-bikes-in-the-canal


I hadn’t appreciated that Serco were behind the Santander bikes in London. Apparently they scrapped their Edinburgh scheme last year as vandalism was costing too much.

I like those countries where you have a rack on the bus to take bikes. Now we are talking about integrated transport.


I feel a letter to my MP is due.


Please feel free to add other suggestions. My list includes secure bike parking at stations and the high street, bike storage on trains, and physical Vs electronic speed controls in urban areas particularly relevant to the Brenchley Gardens race track.

I agree with all of those (subject to any unforeseen safety issues with the bike racks - if on the front of buses I guess they might get caught on things?) reminds me that my mum used to hang my pushchair on the back of the bus when I was small


http://transpressnz.blogspot.com/2012/01/carrying-prams-on-buses-in-lower-hutt.html?m=1 (Found a pic to illustrate this)

Ban people? Some folk are responsible and others aren’t. Best thing you can do is move a badly placed bike or scooter to a safer place.

 

Agreed. Throw them somewhere they won't risk hurting or inconveniencing anyone. Like a skip.

Unfortunately, if you skip them, there's a pile of valuable metal that won't be recycled, and a harmful battery that shouldn't be burned or landfilled. Theft would be a much more sustainable and ethical option.

 

my mum used to hang my pushchair on the back of the bus when I was small


http://transpressnz.blogspot.com/2012/01/carrying-prams-on-buses-in-lower-hutt.html?m=1 (Found a pic to illustrate this)

 

Were you in the pram at the time? To be less flippant: the 1 pram per bus maximum is actually a big problem on the 185, 3, P4....

Personally, I would make sure that every street had at least one space for a car club car, and one or two for hire bikes - on the road (not the pavement).


I'm afraid that if that happened the one place you probably wouldn't find a bike left is in a designated space. Walking around today they are dumped just where it's convenient to their (former) riders - who would not go seeking out the 'right' spot for them. That's part of their allure - they are 'drop and forget' items. You would have (as other's have noted) to have a regime of fines for those not left in the right space. And the cost of pursuing offenders might well destroy any current business model. As well as reducing their attractiveness to users.

You would have (as other's have noted) to have a regime of fines for those not left in the right space. And the cost of pursuing offenders might well destroy any current business model. As well as reducing their attractiveness to users.

 

Like a deposit scheme, hike the upfront cost and then pay back the deposit element when it's left in the right spot (assuming that's automatically detected)?

Whilst it may be therapeutic to share frustrations with others, as well as contacting the powers that be, also try the company.


I did this with Zip car once and they sorted things out. No doubt too many bikes to sort out immediately but why not share ideas about a deposit scheme?

In Lisbon you have to move e-scooters to a designated place, or the app keeps charging you.


Ill be honest, in London if im every using these things, i do just dump them wherever, because its easier and you are allowed to.

In Lisbon you have to move e-scooters to a designated place, or the app keeps charging you.


Ill be honest, in London if im every using these things, i do just dump them wherever, because its easier and you are allowed to.

 

The Lime scooters have to park in designated places. I've seen one on LL and another on Barry Road.


What Lime and Human Forest need to do is fine customers who don't park their bikes properly. They already have to take a photo after parking the bike which should show if a customer has just dumped it on the pavement blocking access.

Dockless bikes should - like Lime/Uber's old bikes - have an integral cable lock, and users should have to lock them to something in order to terminate the ride. This would bring them back in line with privately owned bikes, which never get "abandoned" in the middle of SODDING PAVEMENTS

 


Interesting to see the number of accidents have increased.

 

Yeah but predictable when you radically increase the usage of scooters. The more interesting question is whether they're replacing car journeys (good), relieving capacity on public transport at peaks (good), inducing new journeys (maybe bad), or just cannibalizing public transport ridership (bad).

In respect of accidents Billy, I did read somewhere the percentage of accidents on unlicensed scooters compared to the trial ones is unacceptably high.


The unlicensed ones are not restricted speed wise, may not be so robust and aren't tracked to ensure they are used only on the road nor do they have identification plates so unfortunately they aren't always driven by those with licences or as much caution as those on licenced scooters.


Not sure how the private use of scooters will be managed but there needs to be robust rules and enforcement of bad usage in place when tje trial is over.

I was under the impression that it was still illegal to ride unlicensed scooters I.e. privately owned scooters on public roads and I don’t think there’s any plan to change that once the trial of licensed, rented scooters is completed.

As regards bike usage (see above) it will also be interesting to see if poor weather (when/ if we get any) will reduce or not impact usage. My guess would be that (as for normal bikes) bad weather (rain, high winds, ice) will tend to diminish usage - so that we might, over time, expect these to be substantially summer uses. Risks of using them escalate as weather worsens. And will the novelty wear-off?


Not that it is necessarily bad to see them only used in good weather - but the overall impact on road usage will need to be measured over a number of years, not months, to gauge their contribution to reduced air pollution (by which I do not mean CO2 emissions).

I was under the impression that it was still illegal to ride unlicensed scooters I.e. privately owned scooters on public roads and I don’t think there’s any plan to change that once the trial of licensed, rented scooters is completed.

 

They are, but that doesn't stop people or accidents

Some quite interesting background on the scooter / ebike situation here


https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s109708/Report%20-%20IDM%20Pan%20London%20E-scooter%20Trial%20and%20Southwark%20E-bike%20Trial%20final.pdf


Looks like to date Southwark hasn’t has a formal arrangement with the ebike operators allowing docking stations etc but has less formally allowed bikes to be dropped and collected from pavements etc ( with no financial benefit to the council it would seem). A cynic might say that by behaving badly the bike operators have forced Southwark to the table to make a more formal agreement. It’s not clear to me that Southwark is going to demand more than its costs associated with making parking arrangements ( see paras 35 and 36), I certainly think they should be ( we’re talking corporate multinationals running these services for profit, not local folk trying to save the planet, whatever the marketing hype might suggest).

Why do users leave the bikes in the wrong places? It would be good to understand behaviour better.


Are users tree huggers, if so it would be surprising that they are not being more responsible.


Kids? Well all generations are in part irresponsible.


Young adults, who are generally quite selfish?


Gross generalisations but it would be good to know behaviours and how best to change this, avoiding big sticks and recognising benefits for personal mobility and the environment.

The big question will be what types of journeys are these replacing - I very much doubt they are car journeys so if they are either walking or public transport then there will likely be a negative environmental impact by their use.


I suspect councils are using these for a bit of greenwashing but don't properly understand the long-term impact in terms of environmental (both climate change and littering etc - every European city has a big littering problem with them dumped all over the place and the same debate is raging in most of them - are they actually worth it?).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you are looking for a trustworthy professional, I highly recommend Niko. He has consistently delivered quality work. No job is too small, and he is always accommodating. He has helped me out on a number of occasions, often at short notice when unexpected issues arose. His number is 07818 607583. 
    • Well, they do turn them away from the A&E route at Kings and rightly so they employ GPs and if after triaging you’re determined to have a GP type problem you are sent to see one of the GPs on site or close to the site. 
    • My bike (a ELOPS 120 step over classic from Decathlon) was stolen from outside The Belham this afternoon. I locked it up while I collected my kids, then the street was so busy that I left it there while I walked them home. Did a few other things at home, came back about 5.30pm and it was gone. Sharing just in case anyone sees it or finds it anywhere - it’s a few years old and the chain is a bit rusty/makes a clicking sound so maybe there’s a slight chance someone would dump it! Really annoying and just a reminder to be really careful with bikes. The picture shows the bike model from the Decathlon website.
    • Thanks, I didn't know that.  People are even more stupid than I thought then, if they are willing to wait hours in A&E for an ingrown toenail. I presume they don't get put at the front of the queue. Why isn't the 111 service more widely advertised? That puts you in touch with a doctor, who will advise on the phone or visit, and if necessary  you will be advised to go to A&E or they will arrange an ambulance to take you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...