Jump to content

Lime bikes (and other hire companies) left in middle of pavement


first mate

Recommended Posts

I forgot my phone or would have posted a picture. Junction of Barry Rd next to pedestrian crossing and entrance to Peckham Rye Park.


A jumble/ heap of around 20 Urban Forest hire bikes strewn around the pavement. Unsightly, a hazard and just plain wrong.

 

Just passed by and they’ve all gone …

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. I pass that way regularly so it will be interesting to see what happens next.


On my own street this morning, a locked ( to a post) bike lying on its side, partly blocking the pavement. Perhaps it has been kicked over deliberately, but it is chained to something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be worse..


https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2018/03/bike-share-oversupply-in-china-huge-piles-of-abandoned-and-broken-bicycles/556268/


Interesting Guardian article with some of the background here.


https://amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2022/jul/28/bicycle-graveyards-why-do-so-many-bikes-end-up-underwater


Which led me to these which I thought was interesting, about the failed mobike roll out in Manchester, and their subsequent decision to go with something more integrated with public transport and not allowing loads of bikes randomly dumped about the place (ie docking stations required)


https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/what-fate-mobike-can-teach-20582240?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target


Although still some nervousness about the potential for vandalism


https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/nov/10/andy-burnham-dont-throw-manchester-hire-bikes-in-the-canal


I hadn’t appreciated that Serco were behind the Santander bikes in London. Apparently they scrapped their Edinburgh scheme last year as vandalism was costing too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like those countries where you have a rack on the bus to take bikes. Now we are talking about integrated transport.


I feel a letter to my MP is due.


Please feel free to add other suggestions. My list includes secure bike parking at stations and the high street, bike storage on trains, and physical Vs electronic speed controls in urban areas particularly relevant to the Brenchley Gardens race track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with all of those (subject to any unforeseen safety issues with the bike racks - if on the front of buses I guess they might get caught on things?) reminds me that my mum used to hang my pushchair on the back of the bus when I was small


http://transpressnz.blogspot.com/2012/01/carrying-prams-on-buses-in-lower-hutt.html?m=1 (Found a pic to illustrate this)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ban people? Some folk are responsible and others aren’t. Best thing you can do is move a badly placed bike or scooter to a safer place.

 

Agreed. Throw them somewhere they won't risk hurting or inconveniencing anyone. Like a skip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, if you skip them, there's a pile of valuable metal that won't be recycled, and a harmful battery that shouldn't be burned or landfilled. Theft would be a much more sustainable and ethical option.

 

my mum used to hang my pushchair on the back of the bus when I was small


http://transpressnz.blogspot.com/2012/01/carrying-prams-on-buses-in-lower-hutt.html?m=1 (Found a pic to illustrate this)

 

Were you in the pram at the time? To be less flippant: the 1 pram per bus maximum is actually a big problem on the 185, 3, P4....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I would make sure that every street had at least one space for a car club car, and one or two for hire bikes - on the road (not the pavement).


I'm afraid that if that happened the one place you probably wouldn't find a bike left is in a designated space. Walking around today they are dumped just where it's convenient to their (former) riders - who would not go seeking out the 'right' spot for them. That's part of their allure - they are 'drop and forget' items. You would have (as other's have noted) to have a regime of fines for those not left in the right space. And the cost of pursuing offenders might well destroy any current business model. As well as reducing their attractiveness to users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would have (as other's have noted) to have a regime of fines for those not left in the right space. And the cost of pursuing offenders might well destroy any current business model. As well as reducing their attractiveness to users.

 

Like a deposit scheme, hike the upfront cost and then pay back the deposit element when it's left in the right spot (assuming that's automatically detected)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst it may be therapeutic to share frustrations with others, as well as contacting the powers that be, also try the company.


I did this with Zip car once and they sorted things out. No doubt too many bikes to sort out immediately but why not share ideas about a deposit scheme?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Lisbon you have to move e-scooters to a designated place, or the app keeps charging you.


Ill be honest, in London if im every using these things, i do just dump them wherever, because its easier and you are allowed to.

 

The Lime scooters have to park in designated places. I've seen one on LL and another on Barry Road.


What Lime and Human Forest need to do is fine customers who don't park their bikes properly. They already have to take a photo after parking the bike which should show if a customer has just dumped it on the pavement blocking access.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dockless bikes should - like Lime/Uber's old bikes - have an integral cable lock, and users should have to lock them to something in order to terminate the ride. This would bring them back in line with privately owned bikes, which never get "abandoned" in the middle of SODDING PAVEMENTS

 


Interesting to see the number of accidents have increased.

 

Yeah but predictable when you radically increase the usage of scooters. The more interesting question is whether they're replacing car journeys (good), relieving capacity on public transport at peaks (good), inducing new journeys (maybe bad), or just cannibalizing public transport ridership (bad).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In respect of accidents Billy, I did read somewhere the percentage of accidents on unlicensed scooters compared to the trial ones is unacceptably high.


The unlicensed ones are not restricted speed wise, may not be so robust and aren't tracked to ensure they are used only on the road nor do they have identification plates so unfortunately they aren't always driven by those with licences or as much caution as those on licenced scooters.


Not sure how the private use of scooters will be managed but there needs to be robust rules and enforcement of bad usage in place when tje trial is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As regards bike usage (see above) it will also be interesting to see if poor weather (when/ if we get any) will reduce or not impact usage. My guess would be that (as for normal bikes) bad weather (rain, high winds, ice) will tend to diminish usage - so that we might, over time, expect these to be substantially summer uses. Risks of using them escalate as weather worsens. And will the novelty wear-off?


Not that it is necessarily bad to see them only used in good weather - but the overall impact on road usage will need to be measured over a number of years, not months, to gauge their contribution to reduced air pollution (by which I do not mean CO2 emissions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that it was still illegal to ride unlicensed scooters I.e. privately owned scooters on public roads and I don’t think there’s any plan to change that once the trial of licensed, rented scooters is completed.

 

They are, but that doesn't stop people or accidents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some quite interesting background on the scooter / ebike situation here


https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s109708/Report%20-%20IDM%20Pan%20London%20E-scooter%20Trial%20and%20Southwark%20E-bike%20Trial%20final.pdf


Looks like to date Southwark hasn’t has a formal arrangement with the ebike operators allowing docking stations etc but has less formally allowed bikes to be dropped and collected from pavements etc ( with no financial benefit to the council it would seem). A cynic might say that by behaving badly the bike operators have forced Southwark to the table to make a more formal agreement. It’s not clear to me that Southwark is going to demand more than its costs associated with making parking arrangements ( see paras 35 and 36), I certainly think they should be ( we’re talking corporate multinationals running these services for profit, not local folk trying to save the planet, whatever the marketing hype might suggest).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do users leave the bikes in the wrong places? It would be good to understand behaviour better.


Are users tree huggers, if so it would be surprising that they are not being more responsible.


Kids? Well all generations are in part irresponsible.


Young adults, who are generally quite selfish?


Gross generalisations but it would be good to know behaviours and how best to change this, avoiding big sticks and recognising benefits for personal mobility and the environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big question will be what types of journeys are these replacing - I very much doubt they are car journeys so if they are either walking or public transport then there will likely be a negative environmental impact by their use.


I suspect councils are using these for a bit of greenwashing but don't properly understand the long-term impact in terms of environmental (both climate change and littering etc - every European city has a big littering problem with them dumped all over the place and the same debate is raging in most of them - are they actually worth it?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
    • Really?  I'm sorry to hear that. What did you order? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...