Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes I move them.


I think we can probably find a workable ebike solution, where hire companies are involved I’d like the council to negotiate sufficient revenue to help fund non hire parking infrastructure. And let’s give escooters a miss 😉

I commented earlier that scooters were more inherently dangerous than bikes. I forgot to add the further hazard that many e scooter riders have one hand on the bars and the other on their phone, and a slighly lower percentage of those on Lime bikes.


So if you really want to channel your energies two issues you should ask your politicians about

(a) cycling/scootering whilst on a mobile phone

(b) cycling/ scootering on pavements


This is not necessarily about enforcement, but can be hearts and minds. Government is doing neither but I can draw a parallel to an earlier campaign discouraging mobile use by pedestrians being on their phone whilst crossing the road. There was a graphic with a young person texting and then getting run over.


And good on you for moving bikes on the pavement

If I can move them, I do but often it is many not a few.


I am with you on the e-scooters LL. Let's leave those for private ownership, as and when, and encourage more walking. If you can use an e- scooter you can almost certainly walk.


If the council is going to sub-let large swathes of public pavement to private e-bike companies then the quid pro quo has to be proper, safe management and hire of those bikes. I still think parking camera cars could monitor drop- off areas and issue on the spot fines for those seen leaving a bike lying on the pavement.

I still think parking camera cars could monitor drop- off areas and issue on the spot fines for those seen leaving a bike lying on the pavement.

 

Doesn't need to be that complicated. Dockless scooters and bikes work off GPS, they have geofenced "go-slow" zones where the speed is automatically capped at about 8mph, the parking zones are all programmed in and (in theory), if you leave one randomly lying around, the app is supposed to dock you credit for not leaving it in a designated parking spot. (I don't know whether it does or not, I'm not signed up to them although I've read the T&C's which say they will charge you more per ride if you leave them outside designated zones).


Part of the trial stuff is finding out when and how people use them and moving the parking zones accordingly. If you find a host of scooters regularly being left outside the pub, then it'd be logical to put a parking zone there, which means one can be painted in properly out of the way of pedestrians. If you "install" a parking zone and its never used, it's an indication that it's in the wrong place!

Ah, that is really useful to know.


To add, if money is docked through the app I guess that should make its way to the council for public use. Agree probably too difficult but in principle?

 

That would depend on the T&C's / operating agreement that the council has with the e-scooter company and TfL has some oversight in it as well.

More info here:

https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/electric-scooter-rental-trial#on-this-page-2

Given the way e-scooters are just dumped all over the place I suspect that the operators aren't too keen to punish the riders.


I was in Rome recently and they have awful problems with e-scooters (the streets in the centre of Rome are just littered with them) and are actively trying to resolve many of the issues that we are seeing here - hopefully TFL and councils don't repeat many of the mistakes others have made.


https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/rome-scooter-problems/index.html

I still think parking camera cars could monitor drop- off areas and issue on the spot fines for those seen leaving a bike lying on the pavement.

 

Dockless scooters and bikes work off GPS, they have geofenced "go-slow" zones where the speed is automatically capped at about 8mph, the parking zones are all programmed in and (in theory), if you leave one randomly lying around, the app is supposed to dock you credit for not leaving it in a designated parking spot.

 

Again, you are treating bikes and scooters as the same. They are not. There is no licensing regime or special trial for bike usage. There is no requirement in Southwark to leave bikes of any description in any particular place.

Yes, but Southwark has expressed a commitment to Active Travel and to supporting rights of disabled and less mobile. Bikes/scooters cluttering up the pavements hinder both. Therefore, even if there is currently nothing to say where hire bikes should be left, perhaps there needs to be?


I say hire bikes because, to date, I have not seen privately owned bikes left in a similar manner.

And therein lies the issue - people don't leave their private bikes in the middle of pavements for a days at a time until they use them next but people using hires bikes can and do - because that is the business model - you leave it where you want because the plan is that someone else will use it and move it to the next place and so it repeats....


It means the business model is built on the ability to leave the bikes where you want/need.

The e-scooters seem to be a fad. Today I saw plenty of them parked up at the e-scooter bays on Peckham Rye/East Dulwich Road and Barry Road.


However the e-bikes are being used on a daily basis which seem to be what the public demand.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davekeating/2019/10/29/cities-are-cracking-down-on-shared-e-scooters/


Seems the evidence against e-scooters has been out there for some time. Why wait for the same issues to emerge here?

I left a bike near Whitleys in Bayswater many years ago and went to the cinema. I came out two hours later to find I had not properly locked it to street furniture. It had fallen onto the pavement and people were politely walking round it. Obviously pleased it was not stolen but was I an early adopter of parking your bike on the pavement?

if there is currently nothing to say where hire bikes should be left, perhaps there needs to be?

 

Maybe yes, maybe no, but misunderstanding where we are now won't help us get to where we want to go in the future.

Not sure where you think the misunderstanding is.


Bikes and scooters are being left lying around in a way that hinders Active Travel and those less mobile/disabled.


Thus far there seems no plan to deal with that.


There seems to be a body of evidence in other countries that the bike/e-scooter-plonk-it-anywhere-when-you-are-done syndrome, gets worse not better without some form of intervention and regulation.

My concern is for those who are either disabled, in powered wheelchairs, are partially sighted or blind, especially for those who live in supported accommodation in Underhill Road and Lordship Lane and have to navigate these disguarded bikes and scooters as they go about living their lives. Am actually surprised no one has tripped or fallen over any of these hazardous bikes yet.
I'd like to think most of the e-bikes at least are now being parked sensibly. The summer was horrendous for them being dumped in the middle of pavements or left lying down across them, but not seen that so much now we're in the colder months.

And on a note of jollity, can you get stopped for riding one of these bikes after an evening drinking down the pub?

 

Bikes, no.

There's no law of cycling while under the influence although the police can stop you riding for your own safety, they can't actually arrest you for it.


Scooters, yes!

They're under different legislation and because it's a trial scheme and you need to sign up on the app using a driving licence, the same drink drive (drink ride?) laws apply. I know of at least one case, I'm sure there are probably others...

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/man-caught-drink-driving-e-5557035

And on a note of jollity, can you get stopped for riding one of these bikes after an evening drinking down the pub?

 

Bikes, no.

There's no law of cycling while under the influence although the police can stop you riding for your own safety, they can't actually arrest you for it.


Scooters, yes!

They're under different legislation and because it's a trial scheme and you need to sign up on the app using a driving licence, the same drink drive (drink ride?) laws apply. I know of at least one case, I'm sure there are probably others...

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/man-caught-drink-driving-e-5557035

 

Ex , there is the potential for fines if cycling under the influence


The maximum penalty for cycling whilst under the influence of drink or drugs is a £1,000 fine. This is also the case for careless or inconsiderate cycling. The maximum penalty for dangerous cycling is a £2,500 fine.


See https://www.slatergordon.co.uk/newsroom/is-it-illegal-to-ride-a-bicycle-when-drunk/#:~:text=Cycling%20under%20the%20influence%20of,cycling%20accident%20than%20sober%20cyclists.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...