Jump to content

Boris Johnson moving to Dulwich Village? What have we done to deserve this? ;-)


MrsR

Recommended Posts

Stradella Rd is all Herne Hill.


Burbage Rd north of the railway bridge is Herne Hill.


Burbage Rd between the railway bridge and Turney Rd is Dulwich, but not Dulwich Village.


Burbage Rd between Turney Rd and Dulwich Village (the street) is Dulwich Village.

 

I stand corrected 🤣


But none of it is East Dulwich, so I agree with Malumbu that the thread should be in the lounge 🤣


And please God BJ comes nowhere near ED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this not a major local interest story?


I do think it is ironic that Malumbu, someone who neither lives in Dulwich (nor Southwark for that matter) suggests something to be lounged on the basis it is not in East Dulwich. By that measure should Malumbu not be confined to the lounge permanently as well.....;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
Who cares, it's more gossiping by people who have nothing better to do about something that is unimportant and irrelevant. Probably the same crew who slagged off Poundland opening on Lordship Lane, get a life for dears sake.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares, it's more gossiping by people who have nothing better to do about something that is unimportant and irrelevant. Probably the same crew who slagged off Poundland opening on Lordship Lane, get a life for dears sake.

 

well said...........and so what if he lives in dulwich are the people of dulwich better then others who don't live in dulwich ?? i would like to know as the dulwich people seem to know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d like to know if he paid cash for it as he seemingly did for his other recent real estate acquisition. If

 

that's a bit nosy (I’d like to know if he paid cash for it) so what if he did ? do you tell people what you pay for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d like to know if he paid cash for it as he seemingly did for his other recent real estate acquisition. If

 

that's a bit nosy (I’d like to know if he paid cash for it) so what if he did ?

 

He won't have paid a penny for it.

There'll be some billionaire Brexit backer / Tory donor / media mogul who has bought it as a "gift" for him.

 

Really don't understand why peeps are interested in that scummy sh*t bag liar?

 

Well it's useful to know where the paparazzi are going to be camped out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(I’d like to know if he paid cash for it) so what if he did ?

 

Before he entered No.10, he was camped out at Carrie's flat in Camberwell because he'd lost everything in his latest divorce. In No.10, he shook the tree among donors in an opaque scheme to decorate his residence. If after No.10 he was plonking down cash to buy multimillion pound properties when his legitimate earnings could not have been the source of those funds, that would be very suspicious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(I’d like to know if he paid cash for it) so what if he did ?

 

Before he entered No.10, he was camped out at Carrie's flat in Camberwell because he'd lost everything in his latest divorce. In No.10, he shook the tree among donors in an opaque scheme to decorate his residence. If after No.10 he was plonking down cash to buy multimillion pound properties when his legitimate earnings could not have been the source of those funds, that would be very suspicious.

 

There are reports that he has received £5 million since leaving No 10 seven months ago


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/feb/08/boris-johnson-advance-payment-speeches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...