Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SJ that's not entirely true as you well know. The reality is that the working class communities are gradually being pushed out of inner London into suburbia and being replaced by the cash rich investing in and 'gentrifying' a doughnut surrounding central London and the city. So that outdated view of class, which I'm often criticised for, is more polarised and apparent today than it ever was in the past.


My prediction is in 20 years from now the only social housing will be limited to large estates on the periphery of the M25 (either side of it) and almost all of London will be a bland middle England enclave shutting out the 'real world' and living in a bubble.


Louisa.

I still don't get how an enquiry about tasty street food stalls has morphed into (at best) a class-struggle monologue.

Are you seriously saying that working class people cannot afford a hotdog or pork roast bun from the market ?!

Is that because after buying the week's ciggies and booze, the pot's empty ?

There's no class-struggle relevance to street food or it's history.

The poorest people would never have eaten food from a street stall or a shop if they could make it, or something else, cheaper themselves.

SJ once again you are not addressing my key point, something which has been at the centre of my entire EDF posting life according to you? And to be fair, relates back to my on-topic point about street food and class.


So you address those points then I will address yours.


Louisa.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I still don't get how an enquiry about tasty

> street food stalls has morphed into (at best) a

> class-struggle monologue.

> Are you seriously saying that working class people

> cannot afford a hotdog or pork roast bun from the

> market ?!

> Is that because after buying the week's ciggies

> and booze, the pot's empty ?

> There's no class-struggle relevance to street food

> or it's history.

> The poorest people would never have eaten food

> from a street stall or a shop if they could make

> it, or something else, cheaper themselves.



KidKruger, not just working class people, I'm surprised anyone can afford a pork bun or hotdog for between 6-12 quid! Burger and hotdog vans charge a lot less and it's the same thing. And yes class is important here, because these posh street vans only pop up to satisfy the needs of people who wish to be smug about paying a bomb for the same product you can get for half the price down the road!


Louisa.

taking your hotdog example, the ?6 is top-end on NorthCross Rd, there are NO dogs on sale for > ?7.

So your phrasing on cost is plain wrong.

Where 'down the road' can a hotdog be got from a van for ?3 - where do I walk from NorthCross to get it ?

Wherever the mystery working-class hotdog van is, it won't import it's wieners, cook/reduce it's relishes, offer anything near the selection of dogs.

Your challenges seem unfounded and inflated to support an argument that doesn't need to be had !!

You can get a hotdog from a van on any number of trading/retail estates within a 20 minute walk from the centre of ED, and not just on a weekend either. My costing isn't plain wrong and I'm not talking about specific fast food stalls in specific locations here, I'm talking about a 'type' of stall which is aimed at people who wish to pay a fortune for something which is what it is. Dressing it up with fancy phrases or homemade sauces doesn't detract from the fact it's just a hotdog, it's just a burger.


And KK this argument does need to be had. All we hear on this forum is a constant over hype of everything aimed at a specific group of people and their needs in the SE22 area. There are plenty of decent places to buy food, many of which rarely get a mention on this forum.


People on this very thread have tried using pretentious phrases to describe omelettes for example, coffee, it's just plain annoying.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RosieH Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ?4 for a hog roast, that fairly makes my day -

> > cheaper than a MaccerD's

>

>

> I bet you dot get fries and a drink with it ,

> which for 4 quid will get you a meal deal in

> McD's.

>

> Louisa.


?4.50 with a can of pop then. The sandwich is as big as a quarter pounder and chips, so the no chips argument is void.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How is frittata (Italian word) any more

> pretentious than omelette (french word)?

>

> They're made completely differently - it's like

> calling a paella a pretentious risotto.

>

> Facile.


Oh come off it RosieH, you know exactly how such terms can be patronising and pretentious. And the person who posted that comment was deliberately trying to be exactly that when using that comment in a completely unrelated context.


Who goes home from work and says "ooh lets knock up a frittata for tea" - no one that's who! It's basically an omelette with a few added extras. Just as pizza and cheese on toast are pretty much the same thing minus the tomato base. Everything needs to be put into context.


Louisa.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well it was sounding like she's been caning the

> acid. Literally no pertinent points being raised,

> just distraction.


What does caning the acid mean? I have made some very pertinent point, they've been instantly dismissed by people on here because they do not want to talk about how food and class have merged into one.


I cannot be accused of being classist when it comes to shops - I'd happily love to see Waitrose open a store around here, but unlike some I am more than happy to shop at Iceland too.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...