Jump to content

Alcohol in 'Curry' Restaurants


DulwichFox

Recommended Posts

Although not the first Curry House to suggest So....


Swadesh now has a notice in their window saying they will no longer

be serving Alcoholic Drinks.


They will be serving Fruit Juices, soft drinks and Non-Alcoholic Beer..


Should help to boost trade.


I get the feeling certain other outlets may follow suite.


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31786-alcohol-in-curry-restaurants/
Share on other sites

Not sure about Swadesh but as Islam forbids the consumption of alcohol

some Muslim restaurant owners have been considering the move to not sell alcohol.


Some are suggesting bringing your own. Others may well adopt a different rule.


We will have to wait and see.


Foxy

There's no indication that you will be able to bring your own to Swadesh, and if the change is for religious reasons then I guess they wouldn't want alcohol drunk on the premises at all?


Surely that will be the death knell for Swadesh? Not sure I would drink anywhere where I couldn't get a bottle of Cobra, unless it was head and shoulders above everywhere else - and although I like Swadesh's food, I'm not sure it's sufficiently good to make me want to go teetotal :))

UncleBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fox- how will this boost trade?


I Jest..


>Is it a new owner,


Not sure.. Went there recently for a Take Away.

The usual 'Owner'? was not there.


> if not is he re-interpreting? Maybe they have had

> their alcohol licence taken away, or just can't

> afford cost of licence.


Do not know.


Foxy

I think you can lose your licensee status if you're prosecuted for specific offences.

Just another one to throw into the growing list of possible reasons.


Foxy - why/how do you get the feeling that certain other outlets may follow suite ?


I've no problem with alcohol-free curry houses, it'll be just like India !

Interesting. My experience of booze free curry houses is that they allow you to bring your own.


As Muslims, the owners do not sell or condone the consumption of alcohol, but they wont stop those that wish to drink.


EDIT .. except at Swadesh. No alcohol allowed at all, just called them. They have alcohol free beer.


That's one off the Curry Club rota then.

For a curry houses that is slightly off the beaten track, with occassionally good but patchy food and an ambience that can often be described as subdued, this seems a very strange decision for a business to make


I have no idea what sort of lease they have, but it better be cheap because their takings are about to nosedive

I think it's a positive move myself. Daughter and sibling of alcoholics maybe colours my opinion, but I think alcohol is far too prevalent and in your face.


Swadesh not serving booze would help people trying to abstain when they want a night out. At the moment if you want to avoid alcohol on a night out, it's pretty difficult.

I suspect that normally at least one person in the group will want a drink. It's an integral part of our "eating out" culture. Of course there are other "dry" restaurants in London, but they survive because they're either very good or very cheap. Swadesh are neither. I can't see this working out at all.


On the positive side, maybe it will make space for something a bit more interesting. ED is crying out for some more imaginative dining options.

  • 11 months later...

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I've no problem with alcohol-free curry houses,

> it'll be just like India !


xxxxxx


Only parts of India, KK?


And even there, they will sometimes sell you alcohol with a meal as long as you aren't visible to others when drinking it, or at least that was my experience.


ETA: Come to think of it, maybe restaurants likely to be used by people visiting the area.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm finding this rather bizarre, rather than be cautiously optimistic some of you look at this to have an opportunity to have a go at Starmer and Trump.  The former has to adopt an approach this involves flattery to get any influence over the most powerful person in the world.  Sure he could and should have gone harder in terms of Gaza and opposing the genocide, and there are some questions over some arms sales.  I expect now we have vicars as terrorists the PA decision will prove wrong.  There are those in his own party who will continue to press him on this.  48 percent of the country say they would vote for a right wing party if their was an election today. Farage reportedly has denied that there is a genocide ongoing in Gaza and said he would not block any weapons exports to Israel if Reform UK came to power.  Badenoch's own words (on X) Recognising a Palestinian state won't bring the hostages home, won't end the war and won't get aid into Gaza. So it's reasonable to assume that around half the country would not support a stronger stance on criticising Israel's action. I don't have a lot of good things to say about Trump.  Yet if he can or has brought about a stable solution in Gaza then that will be great news.  That he didn't do this earlier, and in my view caused so many problems with the move of their embassy which in turn may have emboldened Hamas, remain valid issues, as do what the US is going to get out of it. As regards to earlier debate.  Israel protecting the UK from Iran just sounds bizarre.  The UK's position is that extensive diplomacy and a deal is the way forward. Yes there are so many other conflicts in the world that don't get the same level of attention.  But how many of these are directly due to a western democracy's extreme military action and starvation against a territory? I'm with the march in spirit but for apathy or whatever reason wont be there.  For those of you who consider it is antisemitic go and join the march and see.  I went to one of the large earlier demos and there was such a friendly and positive spirit despite the cause.  Yet the media pick on the occasional extreme incident, highly selective.  I'd prefer of they called it a peace protest rather than a pro-Palestine march.  I think it is right to look at the immediate desperate situation, and decouple from the longer term - albeit that the two station solution has to be the way forward and Israeli settlements are wrong.  Hopefully once there is a proper peace Netanyahu will go one way or another (I'm taking prosecution).
    • Starmer hasnt said that’s far as I can see? About Trump deserving the Nobel prize  I mean     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...