Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

our LO will be 4 in the last week of August ( not this coming Aug i may add - We're not that "last minute" ! )and we wanted advice regarding starting school at the age of 4 ( and one week ). LO will be the youngest in the class and so will have to deal with all the issues that come along with that. It seems a really young age to start school when ideally our LO should be playing and taking time just being a child.

What is the policy with schools around ED? Can children start later? Are schools helpful and open to this? Defer a year and start when they are 5? Can/are children allowed to redo the reception year? We would be really grateful for any insight,info or to hear of your experiences regarding this.

I started a thread on this a few months ago as I had similar concerns, serach for 'delayed primary school starting' as I can't work out how to link to a previous thread!


The basic answer was that the only option was to miss reception and then they go straight into year 1 so will still be the youngest, and that there is no legal obligation for them to go to school until they turn 5 so they could go part time for the first year.

My son was also born at the end of August. He should be starting reception this September but we are deferring his entry.


The information about entry to Southwark schools is here: http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200289/primary_school_admissions

I don't think that they will lose their school place as the information says that


"If your child is offered a place at the school before they are of compulsory school age you can request that


Your child attends part time until s/he reaches compulsory school age or

That their entry be deferred until later in the same school year


If you do decide to defer your child's entry, the school place offered will not be given to any other child. However, you will not be able to defer your child's entry to primary school beyond the beginning of the term after your child's fifth birthday, nor beyond the academic year for which the original application was accepted."


Hope that helps.


ETA: If they miss reception (by deferring entry) they go directly into year 1. They cannot 're-do' reception. A huge gripe of mine with the school system :(

dirtytree - it's not all about getting straight down to loads of learning in Reception. Far from it, most of the day is geared around play-based learning with some numbers, reading and writing introduced slowly, but I can understand your concerns. I can't see how a child could re-do the Reception year as they would then have to re-do Year 1 etc. etc. and I suppose there has to be a cut-off point somewhere.


You also have to think of the friendships and familiar routines made in Reception like circle time, fruit time and just being able to sit still for a while and listening to a familiar adult. This all prepares children for Year 1.


My children have been the youngest (and eldest) in the class and each has its advantages and disadvantages.

I have a mid August child and I am happy for her to go to school when she has just turned 4. She is tall for her age, sociable and already very settled into a nursery setting 3 days a week. She is also a second child and I have watched her brother (April born) thrive and grow as he went through reception and I would hate to see her miss out on any of that. Reception is very play based and at their school involves so many fun things with so many other children.. And in this environment they do learn without really realising it.


I guess it is a very individual thing and probably depends upon the school that you get a how you feel about that but I for one am happy for her to start when just turned 4..


My understanding of it is that you could defer your place until the April (summer term) or the whole year but they would then start in year 1 when just turned 5 and it may be a bit if a shocker then as the play element is very reduced in favour of learning..


There has to be a cut off point somewhere and some strict rules as to what happens to those at either side of the point.

Hi dirty tree, you would need to apply by the mid-January deadline. Once offered the place you could choose to defer it, but your child would need to join her class in the summer term or you would lose the place you are holding. You can't defer until September as this would be the new academic year and your child would lose their place. Reception is designed to be a link between nursery and key stage 1 (years 1 and 2).

Renata

Just to add, another reason for keeping your child in the year that they technically ought to be in, rather than deferring, if you could, is that if they play competitive sport (football, cricket) outside school when they get older, their year group will be based on their date of birth rather than their school year. So they'd be in a different group from their school friends/ have to compete with children from the year above.

Also remember that schools do not go back over topics they have covered with individual children who missed out. So if they have been through the alphabet and various group letter sounds such as 'ing' (I made that example up - I am no teacher!) then they will not go through it again on an individual level with a child who has missed it. There may be some general class reminder / revision session but there would be no specific catch-up program geared towards your child.


My daughter was mid August born and, back when she started, her school automatically had January starts for the young in year children. I found her last term at nursery (Sept-Dec) awful as most of her friends had left to start school and she had out-grown it. When she started school there were 3 others younger than her - all in that last couple of weeks in August. All I noted at the time was that she was shy, which was normal for her then (has grown out of it since and doesn't need to be a label that sticks) and that she didn't start reading until year 1. Now she has just started secondary school and I really can't tell the difference between her and her friends born at the beginning of the school year.


Some of the older kids in reception can still be quiet 'babyish' but the reception teachers and TAs are used to. It is very much a transition year from pre-school to the more formal learning in year 1.

There *doesn't* have to be a rigid cut-off point somewhere; check out the Scottish system: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2012/05/7940/4


In light of reports like this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-21699054, time for change in England?? Really difficult to decide whether deferring would be better or not in the current system here...

I think it depends a lot on the child. I kept my son out of school until the term he turned five, and I'm very glad I did. So he got just one term of reception, and then straight into year one. I'm sure he was a bit behind but he's caught up, and he's very happy at school now. He just wasn't ready. But my niece who is also one of the youngest was just fine starting at 4. maybe there is a bit of a boy/girl thing too? does your LO go to pre-school or anything?
  • 1 month later...

I have seen on the BBC today that a motion has been tabled in parliament for parents of summer borns to be able to choose when they start school without losing a place in reception.

This is based on the evidence of long term disadvantages that summer born babies can face at school.


Here is a link to the motion

http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2013-14/213

The suggestion is that if you agree with this to ask your MP to sign the motion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the Brixton Pound lives on, so there must be some kind of appetite for it, but I'm afraid I doubt it would be very useful for me.
    • My primary issue is the noise level and the fact that it begins at dusk and continues well into the early hours, the odd random bang being possibly the worst aspect as you never know when the next volley will occur. This is no longer about celebrating a turning point as the clock strikes 12am, but more a lengthy indulgence in ear shattering bangs, where there also seems to be competition as to who can create the loudest most startling barrage of sustained noise. A new thing is daytime fireworks, where buyers are urged to forget the visual aspect and focus on getting the biggest bang for their buck. I am lucky as I am not super sensitive to noise but I really feel for those who are. As for pets, I am afraid there are now many that require serious medication to get them through- and those meds are not cheap. The fault here is not with the animals or people sensitive to extreme bangs, but with those who insist on their right to impose it on all around them, not just for half an hour a few times a year, but for hours on customary dates and now  spreading to random events throughout the year.I  New Year fireworks is a very recent construct, and now Halloween Fireworks are becoming a thing. Why should we encourage and condone a proliferating societal noise addiction? It really is isn't healthy. Let those who wish to damage their eardrums enjoy their pastime through headphones; they can turn the volume up as high as they like.  If last night was the end of it then that is great but I think there'll be more through the weekend and more discarded jumbo firework boxes dumped in the park. I hope we follow other countries in adopting low noise fireworks and drone shows instead.    
    • NYE is always like this. If you’re concerned about your pets, please consider seeing a vet as they can help. We give our dog valerian and play calming music, which helps especially after long walks and a big dinner. If it’s for yourself, it’s one night, so also suggest seeing your doctor for advice.  It is loud, although more predictable ( kept to evening:to midnight) than Guy Fawkes celebrations which go on for days and are arguably selfish and inconsiderate. Either way, it’s a very difficult time for many.     
    • Thanks Rowan! Well done you have done amazing on your fitness journey. Happy New Year EDF and all my wonderful clients whom I've had the pleasure to train this year. I'm looking forward to 2026 🙌🎊
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...