Jump to content

Diamond ring cleaning


buggie

Recommended Posts

buggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ruffers - thanks for that; need a new home

> cleaner, but do need something to properly get in

> the tiny gaps!


We have friends who are jewellers and they just use a heavier duty ultrasonic cleaner. As I say we have one mrs ruffers engagement ring in particular is pretty intricate and comes up perfect, just follow the instructions and add the fluid that comes with it.


If I've misunderstood and you've already tried this, no matter..

Oily Telly Tyke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ....while on this subject anyone know a safe

> reliable place near here to get a valuation for

> insurance purposes? Thanks, O.



I got it done here, they take it in to Hatton Garden though so it does take a few days. Easy though!

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...
Sofia33 - it might be that the rhodium is wearing off. Nearly all (modern) white gold pieces are finished with rhodium (a major non-gold element in white gold pieces) to give them a consistent colour, and this finish can wear off. That tends to leave them looking duller and more yellowy. However, I've never known it to wear off in just a few days, so there may be a different problem going on....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...