Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is an interesting BBC News report concerning the numbers of drivers caught on the phone not using a hands free kit.


It does beg me to ask the question of why, whenever I see a driver on a hand held phone, they are 90% of the time in expensive or flashy cars. I wonder if they have spent so much in buying their pride and joy, that they can't then also afford a simple hands free kit (bluetooth or wired) to go with their car.


Speculation I guess but frustrating to see when I flash past them at 70 mph down Barry Road (6)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3186-mobile-phones-and-drivers/
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> arrogance is my suspicion


That too I think plays a large factor in it as well... and simply believing the law doesn't apply to them may well factor into it...


Good luck with your plans to get 'knocked over' but remember most of them drive big 4*4's but have no control over them so they may well feel a small bump and believe they have (yet again) run over a curb, cat, dog, local wildlife, local MP or something... ::o

I'm not sure that the type of car has anything to do with it, more the type of driver. Big flashy cars tend to have voice activated hands free systems built in. However, I think at least 99% of people that own a mob and a car have at some point used it manually in the car, even if it was just to say "I'm driving, I'll call you back later." Controversially I'm sure there's also a small minority of drivers who are quite capable of driving a car and using a mob at the same time very safely.

Ms B's guide to London traffic light sequence:


Red - Stop, revving engine to encourage pedestrians to cross the road quickly; do not use handbrake as this will stop you rolling backwards and forwards like an idiot; if on a bike you may go straight ahead, swearing at all comers

Red + amber - go, spinning wheels and burning rubber

Green - go

Amber - accelerate

Just turning red - accelerate, staring straight ahead; if driving a bus or taxi, you have right of way.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ms B's guide to London traffic light sequence:

>

> Red - Stop, revving engine to encourage

> pedestrians to cross the road quickly; do not use

> handbrake as this will stop you rolling backwards

> and forwards like an idiot; if on a bike you may

> go straight ahead, swearing at all comers

> Red + amber - go, spinning wheels and burning

> rubber

> Green - go

> Amber - accelerate

> Just turning red - accelerate, staring straight

> ahead; if driving a bus or taxi, you have right of

> way.


not bad, but you forgot the special rules for pedestrians:


green man: walk into road - mobile phone/ipod optional

red man: walk into road with mobile phone clamped firmly to right ear - do not under any circumstances look in the direction of oncoming traffic - swear furiously at anyone who alerts you to their presence

absence of traffic signals: see rule for red man

Blinder999, you're right - I saw a guy cross the road just this morning yakking on his phone and swearing at the driver who was obliged to brake sharply to avoid hitting him.


Maybe Boris will grant Londoners the power to make a citizen's arrest when you see someone blatantly using their phone while driving. Actually, he probably would.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Disagree. Where are the police when you need them? People want a police presence, they want to feel reassured by seeing them do what the word suggests, policing, so go catch some bad guys, arrest, charge and get the CPS to prosecute with the evidence to enable this to happen. Stabbing and shootings are so common place they no longer even get reported in the public domain. How many crimes don't get solved? Rather case closed and forgotten. The number of low to high level crimes which remain unsolved is staggering.  The criminal fraternity know this, they know they won't get caught so they just carry on.  Biggest crimes which affect most people, probably are phone and car theft, both are prolific and what do the police do, diddly squat. zilch, nothing, provide a crime reference number and the case is closed. Not good enough, not by a country mile.   Met Engage? I don't think so.
    • https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/violent-crime-plunges-london-homicide-rate-b1247078.html Worth doing a little checking before making assumptions about violent crimes. Recent data suggests a drop in violent crime. Gang violence will make a significant contribution to the numbers. You are unlikely to be attacked by a stranger   
    • Unfortunately there are plenty of shops which don't care and will sell vapes, alcohol and weed to minors, I'm sure they won't care about selling them fireworks. Or the kids nick them.
    • It’s getting a bit annoying. We’ve a nervous dog who trembles when they go off. I know to expect it around Halloween and Diwali but it seems to be happening more through the year. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...