Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is an interesting BBC News report concerning the numbers of drivers caught on the phone not using a hands free kit.


It does beg me to ask the question of why, whenever I see a driver on a hand held phone, they are 90% of the time in expensive or flashy cars. I wonder if they have spent so much in buying their pride and joy, that they can't then also afford a simple hands free kit (bluetooth or wired) to go with their car.


Speculation I guess but frustrating to see when I flash past them at 70 mph down Barry Road (6)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3186-mobile-phones-and-drivers/
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> arrogance is my suspicion


That too I think plays a large factor in it as well... and simply believing the law doesn't apply to them may well factor into it...


Good luck with your plans to get 'knocked over' but remember most of them drive big 4*4's but have no control over them so they may well feel a small bump and believe they have (yet again) run over a curb, cat, dog, local wildlife, local MP or something... ::o

I'm not sure that the type of car has anything to do with it, more the type of driver. Big flashy cars tend to have voice activated hands free systems built in. However, I think at least 99% of people that own a mob and a car have at some point used it manually in the car, even if it was just to say "I'm driving, I'll call you back later." Controversially I'm sure there's also a small minority of drivers who are quite capable of driving a car and using a mob at the same time very safely.

Ms B's guide to London traffic light sequence:


Red - Stop, revving engine to encourage pedestrians to cross the road quickly; do not use handbrake as this will stop you rolling backwards and forwards like an idiot; if on a bike you may go straight ahead, swearing at all comers

Red + amber - go, spinning wheels and burning rubber

Green - go

Amber - accelerate

Just turning red - accelerate, staring straight ahead; if driving a bus or taxi, you have right of way.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ms B's guide to London traffic light sequence:

>

> Red - Stop, revving engine to encourage

> pedestrians to cross the road quickly; do not use

> handbrake as this will stop you rolling backwards

> and forwards like an idiot; if on a bike you may

> go straight ahead, swearing at all comers

> Red + amber - go, spinning wheels and burning

> rubber

> Green - go

> Amber - accelerate

> Just turning red - accelerate, staring straight

> ahead; if driving a bus or taxi, you have right of

> way.


not bad, but you forgot the special rules for pedestrians:


green man: walk into road - mobile phone/ipod optional

red man: walk into road with mobile phone clamped firmly to right ear - do not under any circumstances look in the direction of oncoming traffic - swear furiously at anyone who alerts you to their presence

absence of traffic signals: see rule for red man

Blinder999, you're right - I saw a guy cross the road just this morning yakking on his phone and swearing at the driver who was obliged to brake sharply to avoid hitting him.


Maybe Boris will grant Londoners the power to make a citizen's arrest when you see someone blatantly using their phone while driving. Actually, he probably would.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...