Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Clearly tge warning signs started when Clinton's shut up shop, however if Smiths had re-organised the store, sold things people wanted at reasonable prices and interacted with customers in a helpful manner they would have stood a good chance of survival. Especially as they have a captive audience being the only local stationary/book shop in the area.

I'm with SJ....all these changes/ closures are market forces in action. We don't go to shops to buy books anymore....I buy all mine online because they are cheaper and I can get whatever I want, no matter how obscure. Old established retailers need to change their business models to reflect that, or they will die.


The other factor is disposable income. The local demographic of Rye Lane do not have the kind of disposable income required to sustain the kind of niche (or more expensive chain) shops that everyone seems to crave for LL or Bellenden Raod. Again, just another cold hard fact. Too many people are struggling financially at the moment.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm with SJ....all these changes/ closures are

> market forces in action. We don't go to shops to

> buy books anymore....I buy all mine online because

> they are cheaper and I can get whatever I want, no

> matter how obscure. Old established retailers need

> to change their business models to reflect that,

> or they will die.

>

> The other factor is disposable income. The local

> demographic of Rye Lane do not have the kind of

> disposable income required to sustain the kind of

> niche (or more expensive chain) shops that

> everyone seems to crave for LL or Bellenden Raod.

> Again, just another cold hard fact. Too many

> people are struggling financially at the moment.


Not to mention the supermarkets. Why would you go into Smiths for a RRP hardback when you can go into Tesco and buy the same book for under ?10.


Morrisons will become the defacto chain 'Newsagent' in Peckham from next week, it also sells a limited selection of chart and back catalogue paperbacks.

Peckhampoet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two brands that have really lost their way in

> recent times. No longer a pleasure to shop in

> either with their tired interiors and lacklustre

> offering.


xxxxxxx


Totally agree.


I have been expecting both of them to go under for years, can't understand how they've kept going .....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
    • I'm not sure that's true. I don't know how they bill (and I might be wrong) but I doubt they get paid each time they turn up at court and a witness or defendant fails to show, or the printer's broken, or  the loos have flooded, or whatever. I think most remaining criminal barristers and solicitors these days (now there's no money in it) genuinely care about the justice system and would like to see trials coming to court quicker, but not like this. Plus, I don't see how these measures will help - they won't suddenly magic up all the courtrooms the system demands (that prev govts shut down), and do we even have enough mags to pick up all the extra non jury cases that will arise? Picking and panelling juries isn't what's causing the delay in trials going to court.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...