Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I read yesterday that Boris's idea about getting rid of the bendy buses and redisigning the Routemaster is going to cost him a lot more than the ?8 million that he originally came up with. It's actually much nearer ?100 million. Clearly he'll never get this off the ground. Try and get your sums right Bozo.
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,


Boris got my vote because he is cute and doesnt comb his hair. I have also noticed that my local traffic lights seem to change quicker now he is in power.


Another thing that I have noticed is that he does not face the press all the time with useless quotes. He seems to avoid the media circus and badger's away.


I think he is so nice i might just pretend to snog him!


Regards,

Libra Carr.

  • 2 weeks later...

I did not vote for Boris but I am kinda interested to see the long term effect and maybe naive enough to believe he won't be bad (and he may even be good).

What I do like about him is his thinking does not seem to be affected by bias or the need to please pressure groups, but seems to be clear and analytical. Do not be fooled by the nutty professor image. Just because his social skills are a bit lacking, does not mean he can't do the job.

And I loved his reaction to the news of the party announced for London in August, in which I would dare to paraphrase him by saying that he suggested that he was suspicious of state run parties telling people to be happy but that this party may just be a wonderful thing. Or something. I am not quite as analytical on less than four coffees.


His cycling through red lights just tells us what we already know, there are too many unnecessary traffic lights in London!

"But last night a spokesman for the NAAR called that claim into question. "The sincerity of Boris Johnson's claimed commitment to opposing racism in his election campaign is shown to be false by the fact that one of his first decisions is to abandon Europe's biggest anti-racist festival," he said."


But he's not abandoning the festival, is he? Just the previous emphasis on 'anti-racism'.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "But last night a spokesman for the NAAR called

> that claim into question. "The sincerity of Boris

> Johnson's claimed commitment to opposing racism in

> his election campaign is shown to be false by the

> fact that one of his first decisions is to abandon

> Europe's biggest anti-racist festival," he said."

>

> But he's not abandoning the festival, is he? Just

> the previous emphasis on 'anti-racism'.


so therefore it's no longer an 'anti-racist festival' surely?


why he'd do that i really don't know


now johnson's advisor's comments are being 'taken out of context'


http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91211-1319795,00.html


making such comments is surely foolish and naive at best, and very arguably prejudiced - let's not forget the 'racism' need not be about hatred, just inequality

  • 3 weeks later...

It was an absolutely daft idea.

This is a City and we need to get around it. Not just on foot or by public transport.

Forcing traffic on to fewer, smaller and/or narrower roads does not make sense.

I did not vote Boris in, but he has done the right thing with this decision I believe.

If you read the artyicle rather than the headlines it says he is considering - that instinctively he supports better urban spaces and public control of them but has, sensibly, taken account of the TFL analysis that it will create traffic congestion - which is not what the City needs.


So not an absolute "NO" - more a cautious "I'd like to help but still need to think about it".

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you read the artyicle rather than the headlines

> it says he is considering - that instinctively he

> supports better urban spaces and public control of

> them but has, sensibly, taken account of the TFL

> analysis that it will create traffic congestion -


well, that's what Boris's spin doctor says he meant.


The journalist writes "But sources close to the ?18 million project, originally given the go-ahead by Ken Livingstone, claimed it had been abandoned to avoid angering motorists."


Personally, I agree with Jenny Jones' assessment:


"Boris seems incapable of making the tough decisions needed to improve London's environment," she said. "There were huge complaints from motorists ahead of the redesign of Trafalgar Square, but the previous Mayor faced them down. Trafalgar Square was transformed from a famous monument on a traffic island into a well used and loved public space. If Boris hasn't got the guts to make tough decisions, then all his talk of a beautiful London filled with trees, birds and clean air is meaningless."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...