Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When Mrs. Onion & I got married (3 years ago) the average price was somewhere around ?24k. We spent a lot less than that & had a great day, certainly not dull! I'm not sure what people spend money on to get to those kinds of figures.


Quite scary when the average wedding cost is near the average UK salary!

I was listening too but more worried by the opinion of the vicar that the expense distracted from people's anxieties that the marriage wouldn't work. Did I misunderstand her? I was offended by that assertion. I think people marry in good faith. A girl in my office is getting married "we have to have a photo booth" ! She remarked once it hit 14k you stop worrying and keep spending . . .

It's mostly the food,and head count that swing the costs of a 24k wedding that high. Also the entertainment. You can easily (if you want to) spend 100 a head on food and drink throughout the day if you have an open bar, dinner, snacks to keep people going until the wee hours of the night etc. 150 guests and there is the majority of your costs right there...


Everything else is pretty standard unless you do something very flashy with flowers. A live band can cost a lot though as can the outfits... I know one woman who spent 1.5k just on her veil!


Your budget is mostly down to how many people you invite, how much you feed them, and if you give them all the booze they want. I agree though that the weddings I have enjoyed the most weren't the most expnesive ones. Its the people who attend that make a wedding fun or not (like any party really)!

I would have said "no way" until I planned a wedding. Nothing super flash, a marquee at my parents house, bare feet and no proper wedding outfits....but we wanted nice food and open bar and a live band. With a hundred or so guests drinking and eating from about 4 pm to the early hours that adds up very quickly! Add in a tricky site logistically, so need for transport (in our case boats and buses!) and it was not a cheap day! But very memorable and special for us.

They're (too) expensive, but 24 grand sounds awfully high. The very top end, Ecclestone-style weddings must skew the average - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/motorsport/formulaone/f1news/8882383/Bernie-Ecclestones-ex-wife-spent-12-million-on-daughters-wedding.html


The hubby looks like a trustworhty, down-to-earth chap though.

I think limiting the length of the event would make a huge difference. When you have people there for 8 or 10 hours they need several rounds of food/snacks and loads of drinks! Could you do cash bar, at least for part of the evening? That's lots of kids so they should be cheaper to keep fed and watered!


The extra bits to do with marquee and furniture can really add up - chair covers, flowers, centre-pieces, etc. We spent a bunch of time in advance making very inexpensive decorations using branches, etc. from the forest, didn't bother with flowers, etc. But did go for chair covers, etc.


One thing I wouldn't scrimp on is paying to have someone sort the clean up for you. I wish we had done this! The caterers cleared up all of their equipment, etc. at the end of the evening but we had to do loads of clean up the next day.....bottles, cigarette butts, etc.


It depends on how casual you want it to feel - I think if people are all dressed up in fancy frocks, suits, etc. then you probably have to spend a bit more to make the feel of the event fit that formality. We went with super casual, so could be easier for the decor to also be casual. But 8-10 hours of great quality food and booze still cost a bomb!

My husband and I got married 2 years ago and we kept the cost down by not getting married in the UK, but in Sweden (where I am from). I think that as soon as you mention the word wedding here, the cost doubles. Specially in London!

We spent less than 10K (which for us is a lot!!) and had a beautiful wedding with approx 80 guests. We got married in a church from 12th century, then had the reception at a hotel which we had to ourselves by the third biggest lake in Sweden. The staff at the hotel set the table and decorated so we did not have to worry about that. We had transport from the church for ourselves and the guests, a three course meal including bubbly and canapes, staff that served all the meals, wedding cake, coffee and whiskey, free bar all night and a live band....


I'm pretty sure the same wedding in England would have been over 20K!

Hmm, a marquee can be expensive when you add in all the extras (including hiring toilets). If you can stretch to it, I would just pick a venue that can do both the ceremony and the wedding that is naturally very beautiful. That way you can save on decor without it feeling drab. I think the Horniman museum is a great example of that. http://www.horniman.ac.uk/media/_file/TheHornimanConservatorySlideshowJuly2012.pdf


Other tip is really to only invite people you really care about. If you haven't seen someone for eons, you probably aren't really that close anymore. One popular solution is to have just close family and friends at the ceremony and dinner but then have lots more people over for the party. You can negotiate with some places to bring your own booze for a corkage fee (and then buy in bulk discounts whenever you see an offer).


Lean on friends (aspiring DJ's, aspiring photographers) to pitch in! Also, I think you can rent your wedding dress (a friend mentioned this to me recently which sounds like a great idea if you want a posh frock for the evening but aren't sentimental about keeping a gown you'll never wear again in your closet).


Like others said, they longer the day, the more expensive it gets. My wedding went from 2pm until 4am which is what I wanted but it really adds to the food and drink bill :) If its not important to you then have a short wedding!

Yes, I agree, if you can afford to you should go for it! I have no issue with people throwing a big party with loads of food and booze and great music. I think sometimes there can be an idea of "showing off" that people don't like. However, if you really keep it to peole who know you then its unlikely they will take it that way!


However, the marriage is what's important. Amongst my friends, we've all bought our flats / houses before getting married as from a financial perspective that was the more important thing to us at least.

If you are thinking of getting married abroad, please don't be offended if people don't go. I had to go to Venezuella with wife and 9 month old for one of my oldest friend's weddings, and it cost a feckin fortune!!! And other than the wedding, it wasn't exactly a great experience.


Last year we missed a wedding I was meant to be best man for because they went to Cyprus to save themselves money. I had a 2 week old baby, which provided a good excuse.


This year I'm off to Brittany in September, and chances are the wife and kids will have to stay home because we just can't afford to go to all these weddings!


Why can't everyone just get married in bloody Peckham!!!

Helps if your from a Northern Seaside town - half the price and twice the fun - at this fabulous Art Deco hotel - the full shebang Potted shrimps from the bay, Lakeland lamb and cartmel sticky toffee pudding champagne cocktails and lots of art deco seaside vintage fun for 120 people 5k all in!!! ( it has 44 rooms and we booked them all so akin to an exclusive hire)


http://englishlakes.co.uk/hotels/lancashire-hotels/the-midland-hotel-morecambe/index.aspx

There is another way.


We are celebrating our 15th wedding anniversary today. After living together for 16 years, we finally got married at Southwark Registry Office on 16th May 1998 at 3 weeks' notice, on cup-final day (it seems that not many people want to get married on that day!) We invited a few very close friends to join us at the ceremony and afterwards we all drank champagne in our back garden and ate lovely food that we had prepared and cooked ourselves. I didn't keep a record of what we spent, but it was very little. I know that this wouldn't work for everyone, but it suited us, and a surprising number of friends were very envious of our "bravery". Of course the difficult task was phonong our respective families the next day to explain what we had done...............and they were all really happy for us!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...