Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Vegetarians are just fussy eaters.


Why should a chef in a busy restaurant make a fuss about them? You could argue that it's good customer service to do so - but it is also a distraction from the main purpose of the restaurant if it is a mainstream place offering the usual option of fish, flesh and fowl.


Vegetarians crying foul about lack of choice in local restaurants have it wrong - they are presented with exactly the same choice I am - they just choose to ignore the Lamb Fillet, Beef Steak, Pork Belly, Chicken Kiev, Duck Breast, Monkfish, Skate, Turbot, King Prawns (I could go on but I'm drooling) in favour of the one or two dishes that do not contain fish, flesh or fowl.

I've been veggie for 25 years and eat out a fair bit - you don't have a lot of choice but I can never make a decision on anything anyway so it is perfect to have just one choice. However, when I was pregnant and couldn't eat certain cheeses etc.. it was a tad difficult so I just went out for curry.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Vegetarians are just fussy eaters.

>

> Why should a chef in a busy restaurant make a fuss

> about them? You could argue that it's good

> customer service to do so - but it is also a

> distraction from the main purpose of the

> restaurant if it is a mainstream place offering

> the usual option of fish, flesh and fowl.

>

> Vegetarians crying foul about lack of choice in

> local restaurants have it wrong - they are

> presented with exactly the same choice I am - they

> just choose to ignore the Lamb Fillet, Beef Steak,

> Pork Belly, Chicken Kiev, Duck Breast, Monkfish,

> Skate, Turbot, King Prawns (I could go on but I'm

> drooling) in favour of the one or two dishes that

> do not contain fish, flesh or fowl.



MM you left out the Alan Partridge, 'cause that's what I'm getting a flavour of.


Chicken Kiev?

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Marmora Man Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Vegetarians are just fussy eaters.

> >

> > Why should a chef in a busy restaurant make a

> fuss

> > about them? You could argue that it's good

> > customer service to do so - but it is also a

> > distraction from the main purpose of the

> > restaurant if it is a mainstream place offering

> > the usual option of fish, flesh and fowl.

> >

> > Vegetarians crying foul about lack of choice in

> > local restaurants have it wrong - they are

> > presented with exactly the same choice I am -

> they

> > just choose to ignore the Lamb Fillet, Beef

> Steak,

> > Pork Belly, Chicken Kiev, Duck Breast,

> Monkfish,

> > Skate, Turbot, King Prawns (I could go on but

> I'm

> > drooling) in favour of the one or two dishes

> that

> > do not contain fish, flesh or fowl.

>

>

> MM you left out the Alan Partridge, 'cause that's

> what I'm getting a flavour of.

>

> Chicken Kiev?


xxxxxxx


Well if you go to the newly re-opened Clock House you can get a "Posh Chicken Kiev" (aka a "Crap Chicken Kiev".)

western vegetarian cooking seems to be stuck in the meat-and-two-veg groove i.e the reliance on a protein dish as the main event.

Other cuisines which don't rely on meat compensate by offering inventive treatments of vegetables e.g. spicing, pickling, fermenting, and combining textures. They also rely less on the 'dish' concept and more on mix and match - the central element is usually starchy (rice, noodles, pasta, dosa) but is complemented by a range of flavours and textures to provide interest.


I fear that it may just be too difficult for your average eaterie to marry the two paradigms, hence the eternal veg lasagnas and the glut of goat's cheese tarts, although tapas does come close

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also, while there are certain clich?d veggie

> dishes such as lasagne, risotto, goats cheese

> tart, etc, after a quick glance at the websites

> for a few local restaurants, I failed to find any

> of these.


Jeremy, think people were saying that, bar the goat's cheese, those particular veggie 'staples' on a menu were from a bygone era.


actually, this thread has made me think that it's more to do with the fact that some (veggies) are satisfied with the old-skool, slightly stodgy, brand of veggie cuisine (homity pie, moussaka, lasagne, bean stew, pasta/rice based dishes) and more discerning others would like to see (also) on offer, the clean-cut ottolenghi style dishes that perhaps take a little bit more care and execution = less unimaginative stodge. I could be wrong tho.

Indeed, numbers.


Jeremy, here's a scenario: if you and a mate who doesn't or would rather not eat meat for whatever reason were to frequent, say, Franklins, a few times, there are 9 starters for you to choose from, there is just 1 marked (v) - I've just checked. For mains, I'm sure your friend will be sick of re-ordering the potato, courgette & Gubeen bake - you have 6 choices. Granted, The Bishop is better but other places aren't.

It's that groundhog day experience you don't seem to grasp ie the veg option is rarely changed.



Surely having a veg 'special of the day' is not a big ask and uses up any surplus - so cost effective, plus there are pantry staples such a pulses, polenta etc that have long shelf lives. If a restaurant has really good vegetables that they would use as sides, create something from those. Anyone who has an allotment can tell you about the joys of their produce.

There are superb vegetarian - often vegan - culinary traditions of southern India as others too have mentioned, for example, or the non-meat dishes of Italy. The introduction of something 'that once had a pulse' will never improve a wild mushroom risotto. There are restaurants that specialise in serving what is little more than eggs, butter and flour yet the souffl? is held in relatively high esteem and is not labelled 'vegetarian'.

What is unacceptable are veggie knock-offs of meat dishes: lousy lasagnes, chillis and roasts.

Non-meat dishes should be good because they have no meat in them, not in spite of the fact.


Chefs like Simon Rimmer get it

I'm surprised the veg option is rarely changed, I'd expect a veg option in particular to be seasonal.


If I was eating with veggies then yes, they'd probably lose my custom on that occasion. Not sure if that constitues a solid business case for expanding the menu though. Losing a couple of customers now and then may be a preferable option to adding another dish onto the menu.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm surprised the veg option is rarely changed,


well, there you go.


> I'd expect a veg option in particular to be

> seasonal.


if only. Nothing seasonal about baked spuds, courgette and cheese.

>

> If I was eating with veggies then yes, they'd

> probably lose my custom on that occasion. Not sure

> if that constitues a solid business case for

> expanding the menu though. Losing a couple of

> customers now and then may be a preferable option

> to adding another dish onto the menu.


oh dear :( pointless.

"The introduction of something 'that once had a pulse' will never improve a wild mushroom risotto"


If you order this in Italy I'd reckon there is a better than 50% chance it has been made with chicken or veal stock. I know there are more vegetarians now in Italy than before, but (I'm told) it's still a very difficult place to eat out if you are a proper veggie. Much more so than the UK.

There is no tradition of vegetarian food as a concept in Italy AFAIK, but there are lots of dishes based around vegetables due either to the historic poverty of the populace or the desire to eat very good produce simply. However, even those recipes often include animal produce of some sort, because if it was available it would always be used.


An Italian friend told me that his grandparents used to tell a story about how every family had a smoked fish hanging from an oil lamp. If they has nothing else to eat they would rub bread or polenta against the fish (which the heat of the lamp kept oily) so that it would have a bit of extra flavour. They may not have eaten much (or any) meat, but it wasn't because they were 'true' vegetarians.

As a vegetarian you can undoubtedly eat very well in Italy


But (getting back to the point of this thread) in an average restaurant in Italy you won't find any 'vegetarian options' i.e. dishes that are specifically guaranteed to be free of meat derived products to satisfy vegetarian customers (although that is changing). There will be plenty of dishes that are in fact meat-free, just because that's how they are made, but it would be wrong to assume that mushroom risotto (which was the example given) will have been made with veg stock.


Anyway, it doesn't make any sense to me to criticise the menu at Franklins, say, by saying 'look at Italian food". If you want to eat Italian, go to an Italian restaurant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...