Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TT describes a Jay, just wondering what the

> difference is between a Eurasian and British

> Jay...


There isn't one :-) There's now an internationally agreed standardisation of English-language names for birds. There are other jay species around the world, so ours is the Eurasian one.


Some of these international names are quite different from our ordinary ones: Pied Avocet, Northern Lapwing, Mew Gull (Common Gull), Common Murre (Guillemot) etc, but I just stick with our good old vernacular names. If you want to be really old English, you can call a Wheatear a 'White-arse', which is what it was called before the prudish Victorians cleaned it up :-)

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Listen, I'm not Bill Odie (sp), I saw a pair in my

> garden a few years back looked it up in my Bird

> Encylopedia and they turned out to be Eurasian

> Jays:-$


As I said, that's just the posh ornithological name for a regular old jay. And the potential confusion is why most ornithologists only use the Latin names, which in the case of the (Eurasian) Jay is Garrulus glandarius, which sounds very painful...

I saw a crow attack and kill a pigeon on the pavement the other day. I have never seen this before. The pigeon was disorientated as it had nearly been run over by a car. There was a brief struggle but the crow pinned the pigeon down and killed and started to eat it. Is this behaviour typical of crows?
but never seen a crow eat a pigeon Crows (well carrion crows) eat dead meat - hence their name - I suppose if they have been the cause of that meat being dead they wouldn't not eat it (they don't, obviously, operate on our rules about road-kill). A crow which despatched and ate a pigeon already injured comes as no surprise, but crows don't normally hunt large birds themselves. I have often seen crows picking at the carcases of foxes etc. by the wayside - obviously they haven't killed these, although I doubt if they are too picky about waiting for the fox to be declared dead before tucking in.

Beating it up is my guess,

because when they teach them to fly they stop feeding the youngsters and perch a couple of yards away with a tasty morsel in their beak,

whilst calling them constantly.

Hunger and greed takes over from the fear of flying then suddenly they are all off together.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...