Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've found that I react to the high factor creams - even the hypo-allergenic ones. It's almost as though they trap the sun and I get a real heat type rash. I get on better with lower factors and just covering up more & staying out the sun. Not as much fun but better in the long run.
Severe eczema runs in our family so know what its like with very sensitive skin. For years on all children the suncream to use for us has been low spf Clinique. My mum used it on all of us 20 years ago and its still a good contender on the market for sensitive skin. Maybe try getting a free sample/small size to trial online or from a department store as it is quite an expensive product to try.

I react to some sunscreens as well, low or high factor, and sensitive skin creams. I've never been able to figure out which ingredient(s) it is, but some sunscreen formulations make my skin feel like it's burning even though there's nothing to see.


For about the last 20 years, I've consistently found that Olay sunscreen is ok for my skin. It's low factor, so I have to keep re-applying.


Covering up and sticking to shade between 11am-3pm is good. Also you might try a zinc-based sunscreen on areas prone to burn, like nose/cheeks. Zinc is a physical sunblock rather than a chemical sunscreen, so it's formulated completely differently.

Ladival!


My daughter is highly allergic (really itchy rash usually) and very fair skin, so it is essential to have a high spf.

That one is the only cream she tolerates and that one is made for allergic skin. To us it is holiday saver.


It's a german brand but as far as I know you can get it on ebay.


Happy summer!

enjoy

Thanks for all the replies - very helpful suggestions. Will give these a try and see what works. I hope it isn't just low spf that's the answer though - we are pretty careful about covering up but I like the reassurance of a sunscreen for the bits you can't cover. I am a bit paranoid about the sun having grown up in the tropics and burned a lot as a child myself but also, my son had a bad burn to his chest 18mths ago and has very delicate skin there that we need to be super careful about.
My 2 year old is allergic to most creams (rash, streaming nose and eyes) and I have tried quite a few of the above without too much success (Jason organic was the best for us). Last week though i thought i'd try the new formula ambre soleil sensitive advanced 50spf for kids as saw it was new with different ingredients and so far so good. Am pleased as my bank account was taking a massive hit spending a fortune on creams that she still reacted to!
I'm also allergic to a lot of suncreams, including some of those for sensitive skin (get a bad, oozy rash) and now only use non-chemical sunblocks where the only active ingredient is titanium dioxide and/or zinc oxide. It is easy to find formulations up to SPF 20/30, although I've also been able to find ones going up to 50 and 60 with some effort. One thing I've learned is that I need to make sure everyone I'm likely to come into contact with also uses that suncream, because I've gotten a rash even after touching someone else who was wearing normal suncream, so both my husband and daughter use it as well, even though they aren't themselves allergic. Good luck!
There's a very good pharmacy in Herne Hill called the Fourways or something (next to the Half Moon pub). I get the Green People organic kids' sun cream from there, which seems to have the lowest number of weird chemicals in it (I've examined a few!) . However, I've a feeling if you ask the pharmacist for help he may well be able to advise on other products they may have in stock.

We have the same problem with suncreams and it has been suggested that the problem may be (as someone else has mentioned above) with the higher SPF creams. My toddler has inherited my fair skin so we do need a high SPF, but so long as he isn't outside all day in the hottest sun (eg on holiday) we manage fine with SPF 30. He has an SPF swimsuit and a very wide brimmed hat which goes some way to helping.


patt1980 - I bought a bottle of the Ambre Solaire cream you mention last week, on the basis that I am usually fine with their creams, but haven't tried it yet. I have high hopes! I also bought their childrens' SPF 30 to try because it's sand and water resistent - have you tried that one?

My understanding is that it's not directly the higher SPF itself, but that higher SPFs have to be formulated differently. So if you've very sensitive skin, the formulation may be a limiting factor when trying higher SPFs.


Is Ultra sun a physical sunscreen (eg titanium dioxide)? Chemical sunscreens are broken down by the UV in the process of protecting your skin. So they have to be reapplied, whereas physical sunscreens (don't be fooled by the name, some of these are clear) block UV from the skin's surface. They only need to reapplied if they're rubbed away from the skin.


I've heard that SkinCeuticals does a factor 50 SPF, with titanium dioxide. Not tried it, but it sounds good. Might be worth investigating?

Knomester - I have tried the kids 50spf one (didn't spot the 30 so went for the highest) which was fine on my LO so I'd have thought the 30 would be ok too if you find it works for you. She is at the stage of loving to spray it on so it has been well tested at our house and no reactions yet!
  • 4 weeks later...
Just boycotting a bit. Been told I should worry about the star rating for UVA not just the SPF. I've always used Green People 25 on my girl, but now noticed this has no star rating. And I don't think Ultrasun has either. That's not to say they don't protect, I was just wondering if anyone out there knows more about star ratings?

A high star rating isn't necessarily an indication of high protection. I think it's the ratio of UVA/UVB protection, so a low SPF could still have a high star rating. So what you'd want for max protection is a high SPF with a high star rating. However the star rating system is proprietary to Boots it seems, so be aware of other rating systems if you're travelling internationally.


Also, a high factor/star sunscreen still has to be reapplied if it's been rubbed off, so don't be lulled into a false sense of protection. For very young children the advice is still to keep them out of direct sunlight during the highest UV hours of the day esp'y in summer, eg 11am-3pm; and to keep them covered in the sun by using lightweight clothing or UV suits.


Broad-spectrum (UVA/B) sunscreens came into the market a while back, so most reputable sunscreens now seem to have both UVA/B protection but always best to double check the label.


http://www.bad.org.uk/site/734/default.aspx


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunscreen#Sunscreen_protection

That was an interesting link Saffron - thanks. I was under the understanding that the SPF indicates how long you can stay in the sun before you need to apply some more. So if you apply a factor 50 it will last 40 times longer than a factor 10 so you have to reapply a lower SPF more often than a higher one.
That's roughly true for SPF which refers to UVB coverage, but only so far as enough stays on the skin and doesn't get rubbed away during playtime! Yup, UVA is a whole different system and v confusing it seems. UV suits are great protection, plus you can alternate days in the sun to minimise exposure. Little Saff and I both have fair sensitive skin, so it's a struggle to get it right sometimes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...