Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"So none of you will mind when you're caught out by illegal traders?"


I'm a grown-up (well some of the time, definitely when in a deal though).

What does 'caught-out' mean ?! If the guy is offering a decent product / service then good luck to him. If he's not, but I don't realise, that's my fault.

"everyone in ED is so trusting that they will believe any company they see "


most people in ED are far from stupid, contrary to the picture you're painting !

If YOU need tight governance to prevent yourself making bad judgements, fine, go to an 'authentic' trader for your 'bonafide' service.

But most of us can look discern for ourselves !

Blocking the road is always illegal even with a car (ie parking) . It just requires everyone to be sensible. Seems to me one or two cars parked waiting isn't unreasonable but if the road is chocka with cars maybe something more formal might help.
I have to admit I have some sympathy with the OP. How many of you would really be happy with someone operating a noisy car cleaning business outside of your house or flat ? I've got no beef with the guy trying to make a legitimate buck but businesses should operate where they have permission to do so. Why should this guy get away with operating without the overheads of a business premises ? How would you feel if you were the owner of the car cleaning business at the end of Chesterfield Grove ? And in what way is a static car valenting business similar to window cleaners, postmen and milkmen ? TED weren't you the one complaining about a skip in your road not long ago ? A touch of NIMBY-ism ?

"businesses should operate where they have permission to"

Not sure what laws the guy has broken. Isn't this in the spirit of pop-up ? Seems pathetic to force small time business into overpriced retail premises with extortionate lease costs and disgusting business rates. Surely the car cleaning guy is within the spirits of pop-up.


"Why should this guy get away with operating without the overheads of a business premises ?"

Again, are you seriously suggesting that anyone trying to run a small-time operation shoul dbe obliged to sink their life savings and more into it - and just so other businesses (who could have had the gumption to do it themselves|) feel better about it !?


"How would you feel if you were the owner of the car cleaning business at the end of Chesterfield Grove ?"

You would probably feel that you're in the real world where there's real competition and maybe you should have thought through your decision to blow silly money on premises when perhaps you could have done without - although you'd admittedly have less business in all likelihood. I'd feel that I've got a location people can regularly come to, rather than me having to trawl around residential streets trying to win business.


Fair point about t-e-d being uptight about skips recently !

KK, so the next time a builder fly tips a load of rubbish outside your house he's just trying to get on in this world is he, just trying to support his family in these striken times ? And the builder's that dispose of their rubbish legitimately are naive are they ?

That's extremely weak.


You asked questions about fixed-location car cleaning businesses v mobile car cleaning businesses, which I answered for you.


Now you switching to comparing mobile car cleaning businesses to fly-tipping ?!

I understand the argument you think you want to make, but you're not doing yourself any favours by going off on bizarre tangents.

Skips? Fly-tipping?

If the point of the OP is that a car wash/valeting service 'camped outside your house' on a Sunday is noisy, a nuisance from emissions & equipment, makes a mess and causes increased traffic (the very nature of it one assumes means that cars could be lined up for the service), then that's a valid grievance but to begrudge them if that's not the case is something entirely different.

I've lived on Lytcott Grove for 33yrs and have never seen police with sniffer dogs round here..... I must have been out..... At the car wash maybe .... Not anymore I shall be using the one at the bottom of my road so I won't miss a thing

Ms Blueberry wrote:

". . . but it may also be a clever cover for doing more unsavoury business deals. It?s not completely unknown for cars on Lytcott and surrounding streets to be visited by police sniffer dogs. . . "



now you're up to speed.

I means wherever we are you are. In turn that gives peace of mind for some people, especially elderly. Although not for all (NIMBYSM). But maybe the dare-do-sayers will come around when they realise that you are legal and that they don't have to leave their house for a second to get their cars washed at a very reasonable rate. Far cheaper than the dogsh@t clean my vehicle was given today for ?10 (outside only).

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blocking the road is always illegal even with a

> car (ie parking) . It just requires everyone to be

> sensible. Seems to me one or two cars parked

> waiting isn't unreasonable but if the road is

> chocka with cars maybe something more formal might

> help.


Not too sure about this, blocking for access to exit is illegal. Blocking for entry isn't (not withstanding emergency access).

It's an interesting thread this one. The OP, possibly wound up, makes a somewhat rash posting challenging the legality of this exercise. Posts are made under a number of newly created logins attacking the OP. The echoes start. Such is the nature of internet forums. However, what about the original contention. This enterprise is creating noise outside the OPs property. How loud is it? How constant is it? Beyond a certain level I would assume that it would become intolerable for almost anyone. Oh, but if you live in London you should tolerate anything, so long as it's not illegal: a concept which is in itself somewhat gray, I have seen public order laws enforced for all sorts of petty reasons. My angle for what it's worth is that a car washing business will probably involve some sort of device with a compressor. Compressors can be very loud and very persistent. However, we lack facts to make a proper judgement.

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

How

> would you feel if you were the owner of the car

> cleaning business at the end of Chesterfield Grove

> ?


xxxxxx


You mean the one where apparently (according to a thread on this forum, and I'm pretty sure it was this car cleaning business being discussed) people who leave mobiles in their cars whilst they're being cleaned there get them nicked, and the police can't do anything about it because there is no proof?


OK not very wise to leave such things in your car, but I certainly wouldn't want to use an enterprise which apparently employed thieves.

Its called competition and Choice all part of the Capitalist system. Maybe the Chesterfield Grove Company can reduce its prices? Or would you rather the State intervened and said you cant open a competing business within 3 miles?

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this activity illegal? If not then what's the

> problem?


It's not illegal in and of itself. Like so many things, it depends how the person goes about it. If the cleaners were blocking the highway to traffic or creating a mess or a hazard on the surrounding roads, it would be an offence under the Highways' Act 1980. Similarly causing loud noise on a residential street could be an offence under the Environment Protection Act 1990 and other supporting acts. Repairing a vehicle on a residential street is a straight offence under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005.


So get the neighbours onside and run the business in a reasonable, community minded way and no-one should have a problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...