Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 08/10/2023 at 15:35, malumbu said:

Rocks as per original post, slightly amended, this is for this is about the Council and your Councillors.  Please do not hijack, and that goes to the rest of you on the CPZ/LTN etc threads.

It would be interesting to hear positive experience on planning, both projects that have been approved and where you were successful in objecting. 

I think the thread title doesn't presently make it clear that you are wanting comments on the council and councillors and not the borough in general?

As most threads you post on are negative about Southwark Rocks, that's not a jibe but a factual statement, there are plenty of others threads out there to express your displeasure.

Sue, do you know how good Southwark are at supporting cultural events?  I assume that they are involved in the Dulwich festival and the Dulwich Park show.  Used to take the kids to the latter and recall it being great.

There are other threads discussing the good and bad experiences of events/festivals on the Rye and Dulwich Park organised by outside bodies.

17 hours ago, Sue said:

I think the thread title doesn't presently make it clear that you are wanting comments on the council and councillors and not the borough in general?

Sue I agree - it's still not clear from the headline and I think it may still be confusing people as Malumbu clearly wants positive endorsement of the council and councillors so it should mention that in the headline.

I thought it is quite interesting that many of the things people are suggesting are either infrastructure, that have been here for generations (parks and open spaces), or services that are out-sourced to other companies (parks and open spaces upkeep - Quadron; waste management - Veolia; leisure centre management - Everything Active - although I realise that was brought back in-house in June of this year).

While most open spaces have been around for a long time, they are constantly evolving and require constance maintenance.

As for outsourced services, they are still services provided by the council although fulfilled by others. It is the council who oversee the quality of the outsourcing and if the quality isn't good enough they are terminated as in the case of Everyone Active.

Edited by Jenijenjen
  • Thanks 1

Mulumbu must be in a very privileged area of Lewisham! I’m in LBL, just over the border from Southwark and we’ve lost many street trees over the years and they have never been replaced. In think Lewisham have a stake in the tarmac industry. Out comes the tree, in plops the tarmac! I am impressed with the care and comprehensive planting of street trees in Southwark, well the southern end at least, as that is my own experience. I do agree with Malumbu’s complaint about Lewisham pavements. 

Edited by Brian up the hill
Typing error.
4 hours ago, malumbu said:

 

Sue, do you know how good Southwark are at supporting cultural events?  I assume that they are involved in the Dulwich festival and the Dulwich Park show.  Used to take the kids to the latter and recall it being great.

 

I don't know, sorry. 

On 09/10/2023 at 15:36, Dogkennelhillbilly said:

The libraries are really good. 👌 We should be proud of them.

Burgess Park is very good - and the BMX track is an amazing facility.

Home Library Service is brill.  Librarians understand how alone housebound folk were during pandemic and escapeism offered by reading and how it helped mental health, The very small team challenged the council the council to allow them to keep the service going so after lots of meetings it was agreed as long as wore full Protective clothing masks etc, observed social distancing and the users left the books for 3 days before handling it was agreed.  Certainly helped my mental health - I wda gone mad with nothing to read.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

I always quite admire the smartly painted shop fronts on the row of shops on Lordship Lane leading up to Dulwich Common. Otoh, what has happened to the old Harvester Pub is a disgrace. Not sure if that's a council issue or a Dulwich Estate issue, but it's still awful. 

  • Agree 1

Sadly Dulwich Estate who can be RRSSSss.  But returning to good things free cycle training for all supported by LBS

www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/sustainable-travel/training/free-cycling-lessons

  • Thanks 1

Sorry but rather disappointed in Southwark at the moment - riding rough shod over residents, the many cultural events are private companies using our public spaces with very little explanation of the revenue gleaned and how it is spent. Implementation of traffic schemes that are damaging our small independent businesses plus a complete disregard for the opinions of the actual residents- plus of course the revelations on video of housing issues. The only good thing I can think of is the adventure playgrounds for children tho of course Dog Kennel Hill had to publicly crowdfund to try and get improvements to the facilities offered (inc the loos) 

Moving onto the positives got an email from the Southwark person liaising with other stakeholders over renovation of the East Lodge at Nunhead Cemetery.  Very positive but don't worry most of the money isn't coming from your council tax.

Also credit for saving the Concrete House, top of lordship Lane, listed and the first in the country, that the owner was letting it fall down in anticipation of redevelopment.

  • Thanks 1
On 24/10/2023 at 12:33, Smiley_blue_1234 said:

This forum!!! A Southwark treasure, though appreciate the borough does not have anything to do with it 😅

I agree, the forum is a real community asset and a means to give issues a wider airing. I like it when Southwark Council listens to the residents it represents. Sadly, this does not happen as often as it should.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would imagine that the evidence shows that protein powder is not suitable for under 18s whatever the brand.  Staff should’ve known that.
    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then I do agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...