Jump to content

Indian Mischief


DulwichFox

Recommended Posts

That's a real shame, I really liked the food there and thought it was good value.


It wasn't like anything else you could get round here.


I personally think the general decor and atmosphere may have been a large part of the problem. They didn't change much from when it was a quite crap Chinese restaurant, and it always seemed a bit bare and caff like.

That's a real shame and suprising considering the number of more or less similar Indian restaurants in the Lane that have been opened for years, that something a bit different couldn't get the trade. I do agree however that it was a bit canteenish, but that didn't stop Wagamama!

We liked it there but not too often as all the dishes tended to taste the same. It seemed maybe a bit too 'authentic'. The Bel Phoori Houses in Drummond Street, behind Euston Station, which serve south Indian dosa etc are always packed - the food is delicious and it seemed as though Indian Mischief was going to be the same, but it wasn't quite.

Very sorry it's shut - we need a South Indian vegetarian restaurant to complement all the others.

wolis Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

The Bel Phoori Houses in

> Drummond Street, behind Euston Station, which

> serve south Indian dosa etc are always packed -

> the food is delicious and it seemed as though

> Indian Mischief was going to be the same, but it

> wasn't quite.


xxxxxxx


Yes, I agree with that.

The vegetarian restaurant debate has been done to death, but at the end of the day the majority of us eat meat, and the majority of meat eaters want to eat meat when they go out for dinner.


There is definitely a market for veggie restaurants in big cities like London, but they either have to be in a central location to attract people from all over the city, or serve amazingly good food.

No reason why any Veggie Restaurant would fail just my being Veggie.


Never been inside but seem to remember there were bench type seats with no backs.

Or was that when it was a Chinese gaff.


Not very comfortable.. if intending to stay for a few drinks. (Don't know if it was Licenced)


Menu seemed to contain high carbohydrate content.Rice & breads. Which is not suitable for my diatery needs.

Otherwise I would liked to of tried it. Also did not seemed set up for sole diners..


Never looked that busy so not that many people that concerned it has closed.


Those that are should of gone there more often...


There may well be similar problems with other new projects on the horizon if people do not

honor their comitments. How many outlets came you become a regular at. ?


Cannot keep every business afloat.


Foxy

I'm very saddened to hear this. Indian Mischief was the only restaurant in East Dulwich that we ate at. All of the remaining Indian restaurants have the same type of food but Indian Mischief was proper South Indian and better than the restaurants in Drummond Street in my opinion.

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A big shame. I am a non-vegetarian who really

> liked it.


xxxxxx


Same here. I'm a meat eater but I like good vegetarian food, which this was.


I thought some of their dishes were better than the restaurants in Drummond Street (which incidentally I believe are run by the same people - ETA: Sorry, don't mean the same people as Indian Mischief, I mean both the restaurants in Drummond Street are run by the same people) but others not. I didn't like their bhel poori (spelling?) so much, and if memory serves they didn't make the delicious kulfi which alone is worth going to Drummond Street for.


And they had problems with portion sizes, which for a while were too small (which they said was due to feedback from customers who had said they were too big!). They did then increase them, but the fillings in the dhosas were never as - er - filling as the Drummond Street ones, and the amount of coconut chutney etc always seemed a bit mean.


Dulwich Fox says "Never looked that busy so not that many people that concerned it has closed.


Those that are should of gone there more often..."


Fox, we are not all like you who eat at the same place (Jafflong) a zillion times a week :))

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Dulwich Fox says "Never looked that busy so not

> that many people that concerned it has closed.

>

> Those that are should of gone there more

> often..."

>

> Fox, we are not all like you who eat at the same

> place (Jafflong) a zillion times a week :))


The point is Sue that restaurants rely on regular customers....


Like you say You will defo be going to the Ivy House...

and you have said 'shame about Hoopers' you would defo go there.

and at one time you would defo be going back to the Cherry Tree

and it is a shame about the Mag because would you defo be going there..

and you will be using the Olde Nuns Head..


Unless you and others do not go to the Ivy House as a regular it will fail..


You cannot keep all the pubs and rests. afoat by going there one a month..


Indian Mischief is to become a Pasta/ Pizza gaff.


In respect of the short time since it closed, i suspect it will be the same owners.. ??


Foxy

Erm, what are you talking about Fox?


Yes I would deffo have been going back to the Cherry Tree in its brief incarnation as a great place for food and ales.


But it isn't any more, is it? Since the fantastic managers were unceremoniously ditched?


I will be going to The Ivy House lots when it re-opens, as not only do I have shares in it but we are putting on gigs there.


http://www.thegooseisout.com/events.html


No idea what you're talking about re The Mag.


We go to The Old Nun's Head as not only do we hold gigs and Singarounds there, but they do a fantastic Sunday roast.


Hoopers is history.


Are you suggesting that people should, as you do, frequent the same pub/restaurant day after day/week after week as "regular customers"?


This isn't a village with only one pub!


Basically you need sufficient people who go there even just once in a while to keep you afloat.


It's not dissimilar to running music gigs, as we do. We have well over a thousand people on our emailing list, but - obviously - not all of them come to every gig.


So, people may like a restaurant but (unlike you) not eat there every week.


Duh.

UncleBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't cry for the owners as not only do they own

> SMBS and Cheeseblock, and some other LL businesses

> rumour has it that they still have the 'new'

> pasta/pizza gaff it is to become.


xxxxxxx


Not sure anybody was crying for the owners, more crying that a restaurant with some relatively interesting/different Indian food was disappearing from LL ?

Something New was tried...


Not enough people wanted it..


Owners cannot be expected to continue with a business idea that clearly is not working.


So they try something else. Menus are now in window.. not sure if they are open yet..

Soon will be. Whole thing has been turned round in a matter of a few weeks.


That's how business needs to be run...


Endless committee meetings not required..


DulwichFox.

Had a lovely meal there last night. The owner was very hospitable and we had great friendly service. One amazing thing that I never knew about this place is that it has a huge outdoor terrace at the back which is wonderful in this heatwave. I want to go back today!

We had a take away veggie pizza today, and free garlic bread. Really tasty and the staff are really nice. Shame about Indian Mischief, food was lovely, but we have to roll with the times. The terrace at the back is great, all year round.

Great we have a Sicilian restaurant and Sardinian restaurant in the ED community.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...