Jump to content

Recommended Posts

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > titch juicy Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > maxxi Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > titch juicy Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > get over the 'glasto' things

> folks.....it's

> > > > been

> > > > > referred to as glasto forever

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > only by knobs

> > >

> > >

> > > only by anyone that's been, for the past as

> > long

> > > as i can remember

> > >

> > > amazing how upset people can get by a

> > convenient

> > > abbreviation- says a lot more about the

> people

> > it

> > > upsets than the people that say/write it

> >

> >

> > Who's upset? You don't have to be upset to call

> a

> > knob a knob. There are a lot of them about and

> yes

> > - they have been going for years. Still knobs.

> An

> > observation. 's all.

>

>

> Why does it make them knobs?



Now Maxxi and TJ, this is not the GLASTONBURY way.


Maxxi, here, over to you. Draw down, nice and deep. And again. And one more. Hold it in.


Pass it across. Now come on Maxxi, there'll be no bogarting on my watch.


TJ, enjoy. Finish.


Now. Isn't that better?

'Glasto'. It just sounds naff. It always did.


It's hardly new as Titch says, but it's the universal, ubiquitous and insidious creep of the word into The Brand - along with the inevitable evolution of the festival - that irks.


It's Hunter wellies, hitting refresh on a crashing ticketing page, an insurmountable fence, home counties students instead of plumbers from Leeds - and Cath Kidston pop-up tents.



Anyway, who's playing Wimbo today anyway. "WIIIMBOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"

Just to add some personal balance I did enjoy Chic last night and was pleased most of the audience they got on stage were fat and middle aged (ie that this appealed to the righ people rather than kids raiding their parents' music collection). Funnily enough as a punk I hated that late 70s disco at the time. Ah the wisdom of age.


But then a reality check with a dreadful interview on BBC news this morning with a festival goer who did not fit any stereotypes with words being put into her mouth about the bands and how wonderful the Stones will be.

malumbu Wrote:

-----------------------------------------------------

> Funnily enough as a punk I hated that late 70s

> disco at the time. Ah the wisdom of age.


I 'hated' a lot of stuff in the punk era that I like now - might be age or might be the kind of puritanical zeal that was around then - you know the kind of thing, 'real punks don't wear denim... don't take drugs coz they're for hippies (yeah right)... and don't listen to that shit... or that... or that'.


Was reminded of this listening to John Lydon sitting in for Jarvis Cockers on the radio last week - a lot of the mainstream tunes he played he prefaced with a little 'forget yer prejudices, it's a good pop tuuune and thas what it's all about' intro.

How good were Chic last night. I thought I'd be channel hopping between them and the Arctics, but there was no contest.

I was a teenage Punk/New Wave, and malumbu you're right, Disco was supposed to be the enemy, so imagine my surprise when I rooted out my old C60 recordings of the Top 30, quite an eclectic bunch...Pistols, Clash, Damned, Sham 69 etc alongside Chic, Frantique, Edwin Starr. I obviously had better taste than you ;-)...fook knows how Gary Moore's Parisien Walkways got in there though...

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Cockney Rejects on every other page of Sounds,

> > Bushell spouting forth......what was there not

> to

> > like?

>

>

> Garry Bushell for a start. Total tosspot.

>

> Anyway, back to Glastonbury. Can't wait for Chic.



I was an NME reader from late 70's to mid/late-80's, probably stopped reading it around the time when the Smiths broke up and everyone went off their tits on E...there's only so much walking around rainy Manchester in a long overcoat a man can take.

Sounds was a big no-no with all the Oi! and Gary Bushell stuff, also very London centric. The NME tried to champion a left wing skinhead sensitivity with The RedSkins who had NME journo XMoore in their line-up. But for me the whole music/politics died once bands affiliated themselves to political mouthpieces like Red Wedge etc. It wasn't fun anymore, unlike back in the day with the ANL and RAR, propa tear ups eh Quids ;-)

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How good were Chic last night. I thought I'd be

> channel hopping between them and the Arctics, but

> there was no contest.

> I was a teenage Punk/New Wave, and malumbu you're

> right, Disco was supposed to be the enemy, so

> imagine my surprise when I rooted out my old C60

> recordings of the Top 30, quite an eclectic

> bunch...Pistols, Clash, Damned, Sham 69 etc

> alongside Chic, Frantique, Edwin Starr. I

> obviously had better taste than you ;-)...fook

> knows how Gary Moore's Parisien Walkways got in

> there though...



some of us saw the light back in 1979 and switched from punk to soulboy overnight.....well it took a while to grow the wedge! We also went down a bit more of a Jazz Funk route so as not to offend our sensibilities by being called 'disco boys' ..ironically it was far more working class that punks and New Romantics were, but from mod to garage there,s always been a white working class thing to get down to black music whilst the middle classes pontificate over 'rock'

Hmm... well you see back then I never aligned myself to anything. I loved all different kinds of music (and still do) and I wasn't going to be shackled to some stupid gang mentality where you can only like certain things and dress a certain way. Obviously some people never learnt about the original punk attitude of individuality. Back then I took from everything. Once everyone starts dressing the same it's over. It's another uniform. I learnt that when I was very young with hippies and skinheads.


Can't wait for the Stones tonight.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1990' no head, no tent,no bogs, no security,

> ravers vs angels v hippies vs crass type

> travellers.yup. Great



I actually went in 1990 primarily to see Boo Yah Tribe. Didn't some traveller decapitate another traveller in the green field or some such? Did two smiling Buddhas, so might have errrr imagined it!

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 1990' no head, no tent,no bogs, no security,

> > ravers vs angels v hippies vs crass type

> > travellers.yup. Great

>

>

> I actually went in 1990 primarily to see Boo Yah

> Tribe. Didn't some traveller decapitate another

> traveller in the green field or some such? Did two

> smiling Buddhas, so might have errrr imagined it!


Common error Ratty, what happened was that a traveler lost his head and proceeded to give head to another traveler.

In the Green Field.


The Chinese whispers influenced talk of the Smiling Buddhas caused the distorted story.

Hope that's cleared it up.


As the first traveler said to the second.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...