Does the size of a man's tackle matter?

[Dulwich_ Park_ Fairy]

Circumcised ones become desensitized.

Thats just not true. Mine happens to be very sensitive, it cried all the way through Steel Magnolias. It was so bad that I wouldn't even let it watch Beaches.

[KalamityKel]

A colleague came into the office one morning not so long ago to ask wot one does wiv a circumcised todge as he'd never come across one b4... there was complete silence in the office... :-S

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

A hundred foreskins buys you the daughter of a king!

edited for clarity.

[SteveT]

rather costly PGC if you think of princess margaret;-)

Ps are you coming to the drinks this time(?) I will happily buy you the first pint or whatever drink you prefer

[James]

>>to he** with size... what about circumcision???

i know it's barbaric, unnatural, etc... but it's so much better for certain things!! sorry lads.

Can you elaborate on this?

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

Ranulph Fiennes does point out that it is better to be uncircumcised if one wishes to pee in sub-zero temperatures.

[thanks Steve - not sure if I will be there, but a pint of bitter never goes amiss]

[Michael Palaeologus]

:-$

I would like to dedicate my previous post to the late, great Humphrey Littleton .... and Samantha .... and Sven

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

Charming sentiment Michael, I feel another Mornington Crescent coming on.

[SteveT]

He will be sorely missed. A class act and understated. Great reminder Michael P.

Somthing to do with your last post PGC makes you sound expectant(?)

Mornington sickness anyone;-)

[SteveT]

Does tackle size matter?

It does to him stripping off for a living, or to whomsoever you got lucky with;-)

[KalamityKel]

Trust u steve *rolls eyes*

[SimonM]

It did not seem to matter to Michelangelo though...:)

[Anna_80]

little ones have uses too!

[*Bob*]

Anna_80 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> little ones have uses too!

Winding back cassettes when your Walkman was low on batteries?

[Anna_80]

crikey not that small!

[KalamityKel]

hahahahahahahaha stop it I nearly wet myself!

[*Bob*]

I used to use mine to wind my tapes back.

... knowhaddamean, lay-deeeez?

[Anna_80]

Now we're talking, but my first point is a valid one :)

[We-All-Adora-Marmora]

Hmmm interesting... funnily enough me and my current beau (I say "current" not because I am some commitment phobic foppish cad, but because it remains early days...) were asking ourselves the very same question after a delightful bout of slightly hung-over Sunday afternoon love making... and we concluded the following:

The size of a ladies "whatsit" (and I'm not taking garish orange cheese snack...), matters just as much as the size of a fellas "ding-dong" (and I'm not talking big shiny bells, or may be I am... I digress, as usual.).

Indeed we concluded, on this basis, we were a perfect match (Yes, I know, sure she tells all the boys) - due to (drum roll please)... the rare phenomenon that is "MBSS" or "Mutually Beneficial Sexual Sizing" as we have now rather pompously coined it (course we haven't... that would make us wankers...which, actually, we also are - mutual ones of course - I digress, as usual).

And, as a fairly alluring thirty plus fella, I can confirm the crucial importance of MBSS. Over the years, I've frustratedly waved my wand in a Royal Albert Hall or two, barely touching the sides and, conversely using exactly the same appendage (thank god), I've squeezed my perfectly satisfactory party-sausage into pleasingly tight spots - a la Mrs Chumley-Warner in a Porsche Cayenne on a residential side street.

So in rigorous scientific conclusion?

The size of a man's tackle matters little if you have a chuff the size of a bucket.

[Annasfield]

Is the last part in layman's terms?

[shoshntosh]

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>to he** with size... what about circumcision???

>

>

> i know it's barbaric, unnatural, etc... but it's

> so much better for certain things!! sorry lads.

>

> Can you elaborate on this?

yes, but i'm not sure whether it will pass the censors!

[ChavWivaLawDegree]

It's not just width and muscle tone that make women's 'chuffs' different sizes, it's legnth too. If a guy can't hit the G spot but she has a kung fu grip, it's ok for him, but not for the woman. So for some women I think that smaller gents may not do the trick, but I agree with Mr-Marmora-lover that matching up chuffs and ding dongs is what it's all about because a guy who is big enough to reach a woman's g spot but who she can't accomodate fully cos she is too small is apparently just as bad for the guy, as the small guy is for the lady who wants more (or so I've been told - never had that problem myself being an accomodating kind of girl if warmed up properly).

[Michael Palaeologus]

Surely it is the search for the G-spot which is all part of the fun?

Anyway, the G-spot is a myth, rather like the Loch Ness monster, Big Foot and Gordon Brown's next general election victory.

[ChavWivaLawDegree]

I know exactly where my G-spot is thank you very much Mr MP.

The G-spot is a myth , myth was perpetuated by some up-their-own-arse, frigid, man-hating, elitist feminists like Koedt and Luce Irigary who wouldn't know an orgasm if it hit them in the face!

[*Bob*]

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

.... who wouldn't know an orgasm if it hit them in the

> face!

With reference to a previous thread, I assume you mean this quite literally?