Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hmmm interesting... funnily enough me and my current beau (I say "current" not because I am some commitment phobic foppish cad, but because it remains early days...) were asking ourselves the very same question after a delightful bout of slightly hung-over Sunday afternoon love making... and we concluded the following:


The size of a ladies "whatsit" (and I'm not taking garish orange cheese snack...), matters just as much as the size of a fellas "ding-dong" (and I'm not talking big shiny bells, or may be I am... I digress, as usual.).


Indeed we concluded, on this basis, we were a perfect match (Yes, I know, sure she tells all the boys) - due to (drum roll please)... the rare phenomenon that is "MBSS" or "Mutually Beneficial Sexual Sizing" as we have now rather pompously coined it (course we haven't... that would make us wankers...which, actually, we also are - mutual ones of course - I digress, as usual).


And, as a fairly alluring thirty plus fella, I can confirm the crucial importance of MBSS. Over the years, I've frustratedly waved my wand in a Royal Albert Hall or two, barely touching the sides and, conversely using exactly the same appendage (thank god), I've squeezed my perfectly satisfactory party-sausage into pleasingly tight spots - a la Mrs Chumley-Warner in a Porsche Cayenne on a residential side street.


So in rigorous scientific conclusion?


The size of a man's tackle matters little if you have a chuff the size of a bucket.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>to he** with size... what about circumcision???

>

>

> i know it's barbaric, unnatural, etc... but it's

> so much better for certain things!! sorry lads.

>

> Can you elaborate on this?


yes, but i'm not sure whether it will pass the censors!

It's not just width and muscle tone that make women's 'chuffs' different sizes, it's legnth too. If a guy can't hit the G spot but she has a kung fu grip, it's ok for him, but not for the woman. So for some women I think that smaller gents may not do the trick, but I agree with Mr-Marmora-lover that matching up chuffs and ding dongs is what it's all about because a guy who is big enough to reach a woman's g spot but who she can't accomodate fully cos she is too small is apparently just as bad for the guy, as the small guy is for the lady who wants more (or so I've been told - never had that problem myself being an accomodating kind of girl if warmed up properly).

I know exactly where my G-spot is thank you very much Mr MP.


The G-spot is a myth , myth was perpetuated by some up-their-own-arse, frigid, man-hating, elitist feminists like Koedt and Luce Irigary who wouldn't know an orgasm if it hit them in the face!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...