Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

For anyone interested in how the new Ivydale school is going to look, the plans will be on view at a so-called "public" meeting tomorrow, Wednesday 10th December at Ivydale school, 3.30-7.00.

This meeting was publicised by an A4 notice being pinned up outside the school.

So unless you have children currently at the school or happen to have walked past and spotted the notice, you wouldn't know about the meeting.

I went along - it was a really helpful set-up, and good to chat through some of the issues (and look at the proposed building!). I hadn't realised that being towards the Cheltenham road end of Nunhead my eldest stands (if admissions for the new site run from existing Ivydale) basically no hope of getting in. That would be a rather perverse scenario given that, by far, it's our nearest primary school. If that applies to anyone else, there is a form to fill in to voice your concerns!
Hi Henryb - the blurb seemed to suggest catchment up to Inverton road (assuming admissions measured from the existing Ivydale site). So despite living in Hichisson Road (not very far from the new site at all!) we'd be in real difficulty by the sounds of things!

Is the new site going to be an infant school? I was advised that as we are now Living directly opposite the existing entrance (about 100m) would then mean we no longer get in if catchment starts on new site?


not loooking forward to joining the anxious wait for 2016 intake

In a parent forum discussion about the expansion the school explained they planed to put the juniors (years 4,5&6) in the Inverton road site. And with 4 form entry the catchment will definitely expand considerably. When it bulged the first time my daughter had a classmate who after a few weeks in the waiting list got in from Mundania Road.

Having gone to the open morning regarding primary school entry on Tues, the head said plan is for KS2 to move to new building & nursery/KS1 staying at the current school (with reconfiguration of classes/space).

Once new site is open, anyone applying for place will have distance measured to both sites & the shortest distance will count thus improving catchment & not reducing - it'll remain in name as one school so not like one of the schools in DV (I can't remember which) where the infants & juniors have different catchments & so infants aren't guarenteed a junior sch place.


The big issue is for those of us applying for places for Sept 2015 (as we are) or the next year.

Even once the new site is open, they'll extend to 4 form bottom up meaning if we miss a place this year the expansion won't benefit us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...