Jump to content

Recommended Posts

UncleBen, it's not comment in itself that's the problem it's content. Do you really need me to explain the conotations of your comment and how they link to the status of those they are directed at? Would you for example make the same coment about the staff at Franklins? No you wouldn't. You made that comment because they are illegal migrants...the insinuation being that they are dirty and unhygenic. That IS offensive. And it's also not hard to see why some would go further and accuse you of racism (which I haven't by the way).

Good day to you all

At Dulwich Tandoori last night at about 7.30pm we were subject to a random UKBA visit/check. As a result three members of staff were detained and taken away for further checks. Subsequently of the three detained 2 were released and 1 has been detained.

Thankfully we at the Dulwich Tandoori took all the required steps to check our staff's backgrounds and have not fallen foul of UKBA rules or regulations.


Though there is only so much we can do, i urge all my fellow traders to take out stringent checks on their staff or risk fines.

it must be terrible to be taken by handcuffs from your work place however as for the business it is just as terrible to be lied to and to be given fraudulent documentation, you think you know someone by the name you have been given and supported by there paper work, you than realise there actually someone totally different, you than start to question who and what to believe, but ive subsequently learnt that all paper work can be verified and checked via disclosure scotland and they well advise and verify all applications, We are one of three businesses and are now checking all staff details via disclosure scotland and urge all business that may employ immigrants to do the same, its a lengthy and awkward process but hey, its the world we live in. Thank you

UncleBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>I must be in good company (or bad)

> then as all the people slagging off seacow must be

> racist, as well as Sue who constantly rips into

> Cherry tree,and now Mag, plus all posters who have

> ever commented on a business.


xxxxxx


"constantly rips into Cherry Tree and now Mag".


WTF?


And for the record, I too thought your "joke" about illegal immigrants' underpants was both racist and offensive.


Glad to see Dulwich Tandoori posting on here and giving such detailed background.

What UncleBen wrote was technically not Racist...

He did not mention any Race, Creed, Colour...


racist - a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others..


His comments though were extremely offensive.. and does not belong here on EDF.


DulwichFox

It is not racist to just mention a persons Race, Creed, Colour...


It is only Racist if one suggests a person or nation is inferior because of their Race, Creed, Colour...


Certainly do not wish to defend UncleBen's comments but we all need to be careful what we accuse people off.



DulwichFox

I think that the undertones can be accepted as racist though Fox. Would Uncleben make such a comment about white migrants for example? So whilst not making the accusation of racism myself I do accept that his comment can be seen as such. He thinks the staff in an Indian restaurant are unhygenic and to be made fun of. The only question is why. In answering that, there is no ambiguity for me, it's because they are of a different ethnic origin and nationality.

Racist? Are you lot for fu*king real?

The joke was crap, must try harder. But racist??? Take the definition and show me where in the post it became "racist".

Some people on here just live for being offended and it's pathetic.

I can just see a number of people on here being the 1 one complained about this...

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/renault-clio-advert-banned-for-having-too-much-va-va-voom-8713414.html

This is absolutely ridiculous. On many an occasion Uncleben posts utter shite. On this occasion he posted a silly and not particularly funny joke, but it is DJKQ who has decided what was meant by it. A lot of assumptions have been made about intent which are completely unproveable, so lets just let it go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow, that is what it costs for one prisoner. So they get full board and lodging, 24 hour  monitoring  in over populated prison, we are led to believe, minimum exercise, assume a tv in each cell provided - in USA it is together with wash hand basin and c toilet - some have showers as well.   Clearly this amount of money takes  into account overstretched and overworked prison officers, protection for them, counselling which is, in my opinion a bare minimum dealing with prisoners in all settings. Do if Sweden can look outside the box, why can’t we? Or are we just not bothered at all / read statistics some where that reoffending is normal and to be frank, with economy as it is at the moment re employment, cost of living and homelessness..not surprised they reoffend to get back inside - food provided, roof over your head - much better than street living, mixing with wrong crowd, trying to get roof over your head, find a job where 90 % won’t employ you as been inside..
    • @beansprout The Swedes seem to have a useful strategy with regard to offenders  which has reduced repeat offending.  I agree that prison time for minor offences is a complete waste of time. Even worse is that prisons are "colleges of crime" where inmates learn about how to be do crimes and worst of all, become exposed to drug taking. I wouldn't advocate having chain gangs as in the USA but some strategy for getting them into say manual work under supervision might be useful - especially if it came with a modest wag. This would be significantly cheaper than the £51,100 it costs per year for  keeping one in jail.
    • I agree there are other options, but apart from cutting off bits of the body, which is probably not going to happen here, at least hopefully not in my lifetime, I wouldn't call them"stricter"! Unfortunately ultimately it may depend on what is cost effective in terms of implementation.
    • This year it was Pfizer. Last year was Moderna and I was quite  ill after it for the first time. I think last year was the only time I have had Moderna, but the illness may have been nothing to do with what kind of jab it was, I don't know. I have no idea whether everyone gets the same one in any particular year, but I'm sure someone else on here will know! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...